[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-563665-105":53,"doc-detail-563665-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","mpr-vs-merv-microparticle-performance-rating-vs-minimum-efficiency-reporting-value","MPR vs MERV - Microparticle Performance Rating vs Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value","","MPR and MERV compare filter performance by how effectively they capture tiny airborne microparticles and allergens across size ranges. MPR performance is tied to the minimum efficiency capture level for E1, E2, and E3 particle categories, with higher MPR values indicating higher capture rates for common particles. The document provides a structured comparison table from MPR 300 through MPR 2800 against MERV 5 through MERV 14, including specific capture-rate percentages and an optional odor variant for MPR 1200.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/mpr-vs-merv-microparticle-performance-rating-vs-minimum-efficiency-reporting-value/563665/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/mpr-vs-merv-microparticle-performance-rating-vs-minimum-efficiency-reporting-value/563665.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Kurz","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-25","2026-10-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":76},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What does MPR indicate about a filter’s performance?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"MPR (Microparticle Performance Rating) indicates a filter’s ability to capture tiny particles, including those sized roughly between 0.3 and 1 micron. Higher MPR generally means higher capture of microparticles from the air.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What does MERV indicate and how is it used in the comparison?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"MERV (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value) indicates minimum efficiency capture performance. The document compares MPR levels against corresponding MERV levels using minimum capture-rate percentages for particle categories.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How do capture rates change from lower MPR/MERV to higher MPR/MERV?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"Across the table, capture rates rise as MPR increases and as MERV increases. Examples include MPR 300 vs MERV 5 showing comparatively lower minimum capture rates, while MPR 2800 vs MERV 14 shows higher minimum capture rates for E1, E2, and E3.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},563665,1792475017,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":76,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":79},2336478945635,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","MPR VS  \nMicroparticle Performance Rating  \nMERV  \nMinimum E ciency Reporting Value  \nMPR (Microparticle Performance Rating) indicates its ability to capture tiny particles between 0.3 and 1 micron in size. The higher the MPR, the more microparticles—such as pollen, pet dander, smoke, bacteria and viruses—your filter will capture from the air passing through it.  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \nMPR 300 vs MERV 5 02  \nMPR 600 vs MERV 7 03  \nMPR 1000 vs MERV 11 04  \nMPR 1200 vs MERV 11 05  \nMPR 1500 vs MERV 12 06  \nMPR 1900 vs MERV 13  \nMPR 2200 vs MERV 13  \nMPR 2500 vs MERV 14  \nMPR 2800 vs MERV 14  \n07  \n08  \n09  \n10  \nReasonable capture rate based on Minimum E ciency Capture. 01  \nMPR 300  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \nE1  \nE2  \nE3  \n12%  \n38%  \n34%  \nMERV 5  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \nE1  \nE2  \nE3  \nn/a  \nn/a  \n20%  \n02  \nMPR 600  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n23%  \n54%  \n55%  \nMERV 7  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \nn/a  \nn/a  \n50%  \n03  \nMPR 1000  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \nE1  \nE2  \nE3  \n41%  \n77%  \n88%  \nMERV 11  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n20%  \n65%  \n85%  \n04  \nMPR 1200 Odor  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n E2  78%  \n E3  88%  \n  +Odor  \nMERV 11  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n20%  \n65%  \n85%  \n05  \nMPR 1500  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \nE1  \n54%  \n E2  83%  \n E3  90%  \nMERV 12  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n35%  \n80%  \n90%  \n06  \nMPR 1900  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \nE1  \nE2  \nE3  \n62%  \n87%  \n95%  \nMERV 13  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n50%  \n85%  \n90%  \n07  \nMPR 2200  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \nE1  \nE2  \nE3  \n69%  \n90%  \n96%  \nMERV 13  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n50%  \n85%  \n90%  \n08  \nMPR 2500  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles 2500  \nE1  \nE2  \nE3  \n77%  \n93%  \n97%  \nMERV 14  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n75%  \n90%  \n95%  \n09  \nMPR 2800  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \nE1  \nE2  \nE3  \n81%  \n94%  \n97%  \nMERV 14  \nMinimum capture rate of E1, E2, E3 particles  \n75%  \n90%  \n95%  \n10","cbCainYaI6bEBeWn","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainYaI6bEBeWn","pdf",5619875,10,"English","# MPR vs MERV\n## MPR 300 vs MERV 5\n## MPR 600 vs MERV 7\n## MPR 1000 vs MERV 11\n## MPR 1200 vs MERV 11\n## MPR 1500 vs MERV 12\n## MPR 1900 vs MERV 13\n## MPR 2200 vs MERV 13\n## MPR 2500 vs MERV 14\n## MPR 2800 vs MERV 14","[{\"question\":\"What does MPR indicate about a filter’s performance?\",\"answer\":\"MPR (Microparticle Performance Rating) indicates a filter’s ability to capture tiny particles, including those sized roughly between 0.3 and 1 micron. Higher MPR generally means higher capture of microparticles from the air.\"},{\"question\":\"What does MERV indicate and how is it used in the comparison?\",\"answer\":\"MERV (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value) indicates minimum efficiency capture performance. The document compares MPR levels against corresponding MERV levels using minimum capture-rate percentages for particle categories.\"},{\"question\":\"How do capture rates change from lower MPR/MERV to higher MPR/MERV?\",\"answer\":\"Across the table, capture rates rise as MPR increases and as MERV increases. Examples include MPR 300 vs MERV 5 showing comparatively lower minimum capture rates, while MPR 2800 vs MERV 14 shows higher minimum capture rates for E1, E2, and E3.\"}]","MPR vs MERV - Microparticle Performance Rating vs Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value | PDF",1791837094]