[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-239732-105":53,"doc-detail-239732-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","moving-atlanta-forward-2024-annual-review-performance-audit-summary","Moving Atlanta Forward 2024 Annual Review - Performance Audit Summary","","Performance Audit: Moving Atlanta Forward 2024 Annual Review (City of Atlanta, City Auditor’s Office) evaluates governance and delivery controls for the Moving Atlanta Forward Infrastructure Program. It addresses audit-required oversight under Ordinance No. 22-O-1369, reviews spending and program transparency as of August 2024, and identifies gaps in required Strategic Delivery Plan documentation and dashboard data accuracy. The report highlights slow progress, potential equity concerns tied to district spending, and control failures around soft-cost tracking and financial monitoring. Management responses provide start dates, statuses, and planned completion targets for each recommendation.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":16,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/resumes/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/moving-atlanta-forward-2024-annual-review-performance-audit-summary/239732/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/moving-atlanta-forward-2024-annual-review-performance-audit-summary/239732.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Mimi","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-16","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":76},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"Why was the audit conducted?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The audit was undertaken as required by Ordinance No. 22-O-1369 to improve oversight and accountability and strengthen project delivery for the program.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What were the key findings as of August 2024?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"As of August 2024, $47 million had been spent, noted slow project progress, and dashboard data inaccuracies. The audit also found departments had not documented completion of required Strategic Delivery Plan controls.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What recommendations were made to improve oversight and transparency?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"Recommendations include developing decision criteria for prioritization when funding is limited, completing required project documentation, creating written procedures to track soft costs, designating central oversight, improving data verification for dashboards, and using Oracle PnG for project-based financial monitoring.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},239732,1791339000,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":15,"category_name":16,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":76,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":141},2336477974920,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Performance Audit:  \nMoving Atlanta Forward 2024 Annual Review  \nDecember 2024  \nCity Auditor’s Office  \nCity of Atlanta  \nFile \\#24.05  \nCITY OF ATLANTA  \nCity Auditor’s Office Amanda Noble , City Auditor 404.330.6750  \nWhy We Did This Audit  \nWe undertook this audit as required by Ordinance No. 22-O-1369, which established increased oversight and accountability to improve project delivery for the program.  \nWhat We Recommended  \nTo maintain project budgets and schedule, we recommend that the chief operating officer:  \n• develop decision criteria to determine how projects will be prioritized if funding is limited  \n• ensure departments complete required documentation  \n• assist departments to develop written procedures to track soft costs  \n• designate a central oversight position for the Moving Atlanta Forward program  \n• develop data verification procedures to ensure dashboard accuracy, uniformity, and useability  \n• define a threshold that suggests a project is at risk  \nTo monitor project budgets and maintain program transparency, we recommend that the commissioner of the Department of Parks and Recreation:  \n• create separate purchase orders for different Moving Atlanta Forward Projects  \n• ensure that the department uses the Oracle PnG module to manage program  \nFor more information regarding this report, please use the “contact” link on our website at [www.atlaudit.org](www.atlaudit.org)  \nDecember 2024  \nPerformance Audit:  \nMoving Atlanta Forward 2024 Annual Review What We Found  \nThe three project delivery departments—Transportation, Parks, and Enterprise Asset Management—are required to operate within the framework of the Strategic Delivery Plan to manage Moving Atlanta Forward Infrastructure Program projects. The plan establishes monitoring and control measures across each project’s life cycle to ensure adherence to baseline schedules and budgets.  \nAs of August 2024, $47 million had been spent on Moving Atlanta Forward projects, less than 10% of project funds. We noted slow project progress and potential inequities, as the districts with the least spending have higher poverty levels. The chief operating officer should develop criteria to prioritize spending to ensure equity if funds run short.  \nTransportation, Enterprise Asset Management, and Parks and Recreation did not document completion of Strategic Delivery Plan requirements. The plan requires departments to complete project management plans, RACI matrixes, risk registers, monthly schedule variance reports, notices to proceed, and construction daily reports. Failure to implement these controls early in a project results in lost opportunities to correct budget or schedule overruns.  \nCentral oversight may improve consistency across the three project delivery departments. Departments do not have standardized procedures to track soft costs, placing the program at risk of budget overruns. Also, as of August 2024, the Moving Atlanta Forward dashboard, which provides an overview of project, schedule, and financial statuses, had inaccurate data.  \nParks and Recreation is manually tracking and monitoring all financial data via an Excel spreadsheet and creating shared purchase orders for separate projects, potentially posing risks of error. Using Oracle’s PnG module to individually parse projects and assign purchase orders to each project will improve financial monitoring and transparency.  \nManagement Responses to Audit Recommendations  \n\n| Summary of Management Responses |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Recommendation \\#1:\u003Cbr>We recommend that the chief operating officer develop decision criteria, including equity across council districts, to determine how projects will be prioritized if funding is limited. |  |  |\n| Response:\u003Cbr>Agree | Status:\u003Cbr>Started | Estimated Completion Date (M/Y):\u003Cbr>06/2025 |\n| Recommendation \\#2:\u003Cbr>We recommend that the chief operating officer ensure that departments are completing project management plans, RACI matrixes, risk registers,","cbCaihOHUYFRFVeB","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihOHUYFRFVeB","pdf",1438808,62,"English","# Why We Did This Audit\n# What We Recommended\n# What We Found\n## Project delivery and monitoring requirements\n## Spending progress and equity observations\n## Documentation and controls gaps\n## Soft cost tracking and dashboard accuracy\n# Management Responses to Audit Recommendations","[{\"question\":\"Why was the audit conducted?\",\"answer\":\"The audit was undertaken as required by Ordinance No. 22-O-1369 to improve oversight and accountability and strengthen project delivery for the program.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the key findings as of August 2024?\",\"answer\":\"As of August 2024, $47 million had been spent, noted slow project progress, and dashboard data inaccuracies. The audit also found departments had not documented completion of required Strategic Delivery Plan controls.\"},{\"question\":\"What recommendations were made to improve oversight and transparency?\",\"answer\":\"Recommendations include developing decision criteria for prioritization when funding is limited, completing required project documentation, creating written procedures to track soft costs, designating central oversight, improving data verification for dashboards, and using Oracle PnG for project-based financial monitoring.\"}]","Moving Atlanta Forward 2024 Annual Review - Performance Audit Summary | PDF",1789152468,22]