[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-244145-105":53,"doc-detail-244145-en":119},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":112,"head_meta":114,"extra_data":116,"updated_unix":118},105,"en","mmr-article-14-checklist-for-quality-control-for-member-states","MMR Article 14 Checklist for quality control for Member States","","Checklist for quality control checks for Member States’ national GHG projections under MMR Art. 14, focusing on completeness of mandatory and recommended reporting requirements. It specifies validation of Excel reporting tables (including sector, gas, year, and scenario structures), reference-year consistency, correct reporting units for CO2, CH4, N2O and F-gases, and proper reconciliation between disaggregated projections and reported totals. It also covers required narrative reporting on methodologies, assumptions, sensitivity analysis, and policy impacts, including ETS/ESD split consistency.",{"@graph":63,"@context":111},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/mmr-article-14-checklist-for-quality-control-for-member-states/244145/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/mmr-article-14-checklist-for-quality-control-for-member-states/244145.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Quinn","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What consistency checks are required between reference-year projections and historic inventories?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"Confirm that the reference year used in projections aligns with the latest available inventory historic emissions by comparing total GHG, total ETS, and sectoral emissions at the main source category level, with sectoral differences below the uncertainty stated in the NIR.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":113,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":115,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":117,"site_id":56},244145,1790537513,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":120},{"doc_id":117,"user_id":121,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":122,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":123,"file_id":124,"file_url":125,"file_type":126,"file_size":127,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":73,"language":128,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":129,"faqs":130,"seo_title":131,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":132,"read_time":9},962075114765,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Checklist for quality control (QC) checks for MS’ national GHG projections under MMR Art. 14  \n1. Check whether all mandatory and available recommended reporting requirements are included  \n􀀹 Excel template (‘Table 1’) includes GHG emissions:  \no organised by sectors (incl. LULUCF) and memo items (mandatory)  \no organised by gases: CO2 , CH4, N2O, HFC, PFC, NF3, SF6, (mandatory)  \nPlease note: LULUCF is reported only under Total GHG/CO2, CH4 and N2O; Memo Items are only reported under Total GHG and not for ETS/ESD; No emissions for 1A3a domestic aviation reported under ETS. A guidance document on reporting ETS/ESD emissions is available in the MMR help folder: [http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/mmr](http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/mmr) (file: MMR Article 14 Guidance for reporting on ETS and ESD projections)  \no years: Reference year, 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035 (mandatory) and intermediate years (good practice), 2040 (voluntary)  \nPlease note: the reference year needs to be reported for all gases and sectors. If no projections are available for a certain sector, please do NOT report the reference year.  \no for all scenarios: WEM (mandatory), WAM (where available), WOM (where available)  \no EU ETS/ESD split for sectors, years and scenarios (mandatory) .  \no notation keys in case of missing emissions data (good practice)  \nPlease note: In 2019 an extended template for ‘Table 1’ is available which includes four sheets with automatic quality checks (sum check, sector sum check, WEM vs WAM, and completeness check) . The guidance are integrated in the file. These checks can be applied as a pre-submission quality check by the MS expert. The template can be downloaded from the MMR help folder:  \n[http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/mmr](http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/mmr)  \nIn 2019 the ‘Table 1’ should be uploaded in an excel to the CDR and XML will be generated automatically as part of the submission process.  \n􀀹 Excel template (‘Table 2-3-4’) includes:  \no indicators to monitor and evaluate projected progress of policies and measures  \no model factsheets  \no projection parameters: report used in the projections (input parameters) for mandatory years (including reference year) and scenarios (mandatory)  \nPlease note: Only report those parameters that are used as input to the modelling of scenarios; Units are reported according to the default units as indicated in the reporting template. If this isnot possible, please indicate the applied unit; Reference year and reference year value for the parameters need to be reported as well. In case output parameters are reported, please indicate this. For parameters not used, please use a notation key. A guidance on reporting projections parameters is available in the MMR help folder: [http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/mmr](http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/mmr) (file: MMR Article 14 Guidance for reporting on projection parameters)  \n􀀹 Report including:  \no description of methodologies/models used (model factsheet) (mandatory)  \no underlying assumptions (mandatory)  \no results of sensitivity analysis (mandatory)  \no the impact of policies and measures identified pursuant to Article 13 and a statement if such PaMs are not included (Art 14.1.c of the MMR)  \n2. Check whether GHG were reported in the correct unit  \n􀀹 CO2 in Gg CO2; CH4 in Gg CH4, N2O in Gg N2O  \n􀀹 F-Gases in Gg CO2eq  \n􀀹 Total GHG in CO2eq = Gg CO2 + Gg CH4 *25 + Gg N2O *298 + Gg CO2eq F-Gases  \n3. Check whether the reference year (= starting year, base year) of projections is consistent with the historic emissions of the latest available inventory  \n􀀹 Total GHG emissions (Gg CO2eq )  \n􀀹 Total ETS emissions (Gg CO2eq )  \n􀀹 Sectoral level on main source category level of total GHG from latest GHG inventory  \nPlease note: the sectoral difference between emissions in the reference year of the projectionsand historic emissions of the same year should be lower than the sector specific uncertainty reported in the NIR for emission inventori","cbCaivNIbpGTRoDP","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivNIbpGTRoDP","pdf",618000,"English","# Checklist for quality control checks for MS national GHG projections\n## Reporting completeness and template checks\n## Units, reference year consistency, and reconciliation","[{\"question\":\"What consistency checks are required between reference-year projections and historic inventories?\",\"answer\":\"Confirm that the reference year used in projections aligns with the latest available inventory historic emissions by comparing total GHG, total ETS, and sectoral emissions at the main source category level, with sectoral differences below the uncertainty stated in the NIR.\"}]","MMR Article 14 Checklist for quality control for Member States | PDF",1789212801]