[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-179567-105":53,"doc-detail-179567-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","minnesota-integrated-pest-management-ipm-inventory-form-mn-cpa-024","Minnesota Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Inventory Form - MN-CPA-024","","Minnesota Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Inventory Form (MN-CPA-024, November 2018) collects farm contact, owner/operator details, and the plan period, and documents certification-related baseline IPM planning under CAP 114 IPM. The form organizes required general information, attachments, and resource concern assessments, including maps and tool-based erosion, wind erosion, and sensitive feature reports with applicable documentation selection (or N/A). It also captures pesticide handling and current pest control practices, soil/pesticide interaction hazard ratings, mitigation requirements, and attachment checklists for pesticide best management practices and environmental risk reduction techniques.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/minnesota-integrated-pest-management-ipm-inventory-form-mn-cpa-024/179567/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/minnesota-integrated-pest-management-ipm-inventory-form-mn-cpa-024/179567.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Margaret","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-23","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What information is collected at the start of the MN-CPA-024 IPM inventory form?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"The form collects farm name/producer name, address, city, zip code, email, phone number, owner/operator, and the plan period.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Which types of attachments and maps are required for the resource concern assessment?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"It includes checked attachments such as location maps, general farm field information, farm and field maps, plan maps, soil maps, and multiple resource maps covering erosion tools, sensitive features, and groundwater/watershed-related mapping.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the form address pesticide handling and mitigation planning?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"It includes sections for pesticide handling practices, current pest control practices, soil/pesticide interaction hazard ratings (WIN-PST and leaching/runoff potential categories), and mitigation requirements with corresponding attachment checklists for chemical control options and BMPs.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},179567,1790134904,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":47},137451207643,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","MN-CPA-024\nNovember 2018\nIntegrated Pest Management (IPM) Inventory Form\nFarm contact information:\t\u0013 FORMTEXT \u0014Farm Name / Producer Name\u0015\n\u0013 FORMTEXT \u0014Address\u0015\n\u0013 FORMTEXT \u0014City\u0015,\t\u0013 FORMDROPDOWN \u0014\u0015\t\u0013 FORMTEXT \u0014Zip Code\u0015\n\u0013 FORMTEXT \u0014Email\u0015\n\u0013 FORMTEXT \u0014Phone Number\u0015\nOwner / Operator:\t\t\u0013 FORMTEXT \u0014Owner/Operator\u0015\nPlan Period:\t\t\t\u0013 FORMDROPDOWN \u0014\u0015     -     \u0013 FORMDROPDOWN \u0014\u0015\nBaseline Integrated Pest Management Plan (CAP 114 IPM) Certification\nOwner/Operator\nCertified Pest Management Planner\nGeneral Information\nAttachments\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 1.1 – Location Map and Directions to Farm\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 1.2 – General Farm Field Information report\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 1.3 – Farm and Field Maps\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 3.1 – Plan Maps (showing location of existing and planned conservation practices and structures\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 3.2 – Soil Maps and Applicable Soil Interpretations\nResource Concern Assessment\nAttachments\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 3.3 – Other Resource Maps (Highly Erodible Land Conservation (HELC), Wetlands, etc.)\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 3.4 – Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE2) or most current NRCS water erosion tool\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 3.5 – Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS) or most current NRCS wind erosion tool\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.13 – “Fields with Sensitive Features and Conditions” report (MN-CPA-039)\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.14 – Maps Identifying Sensitive Features and Setbacks\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.15 – Maps Identifying Sensitive Soil Features\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.16 – Surficial Aquifer Assessment Map\nReview the following documentation to determine if this is applicable to sites in the plan.\nIf applicable, attach a copy showing the appropriate documentation.\nIf not applicable, check “N/A to Site”\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.17 – Vulnerable Groundwater Area Maps (MDA) \t\t\t\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 N/A to site\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.18 – Groundwater Sensitivity Maps (DNR)\t\t\t\t\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 N/A to site\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.19 – Minnesota Source Water Protection Maps (MDA)\t\t\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 N/A to site\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.20 – Minnesota Well Index Map (MDH)\t\t\t\t\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 N/A to site\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.21 – Source Water Assessment Area Vulnerability (MDH)\t\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 N/A to site\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.22 – Impaired Waters Map (MPCA)\t\t\t\t\t\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 N/A to site\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.23 – Surface Water Maps (USGS)\t\t\t\t\t\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 N/A to site\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 4.24 – Public Waters Inventory (PWI) Maps\t\t\t\t\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 N/A to site\nPesticide Handling Practices\nCurrent Pest Control Practices\nWIN-PST Soil/Pesticide Interaction Hazard Ratings and Required Mitigation\nILP - Soil / Pesticide Interaction Leaching Potential, ISRP - Soil / Pesticide Interaction Solution Runoff Potential,\nIARP - Soil / Pesticide Interaction Adsorbed Runoff Potential.\nX-Extra high, H–High, I–Intermediate, L–Low, V-Very low\nMitigation Requirements for Planned Chemical Control Options\nAttachments\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 5.1 – Win-PST Soil/Pesticide Interaction Hazard Reports\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 5.2 – Applicable Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pesticide Best Management Practices Sheets\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 Water Quality Best Management Practices for All Agricultural Herbicides\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 Water Quality Best Management Practices for Acetochlor\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 Water Quality Best Management Practices for Alachlor\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 Water Quality Best Management Practices for Atrazine\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 Water Quality Best Management Practices for Metolachlor\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 Water Quality Best Management Practices for Metribuzin\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 Water Quality Best Management Practices for All Agricultural Insecticides\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 Water Quality Best Management Practices for Chlorpyrifos\n\u0013 FORMCHECKBOX \u0014\u0015 BMPs to prevent drift and minimize volatilization of potato fungicides\nIPM Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Environmental Risk\nConservation Practices for Reducing Pesticide Environmental Risk\nFor all the planned practices develop the appropriate specifications to imp","cbCaimymCEQWuvL9","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimymCEQWuvL9","docx",84924,13,"English","# Farm contact information\n## Plan period and IPM certification section\n# Baseline IPM plan attachments and resource concern assessment\n## Sensitive features, erosion, and groundwater-related maps\n# Pesticide handling and current pest control practices\n## Soil/pesticide interaction hazard ratings and mitigation requirements\n# IPM techniques and conservation practices\n## Implementation requirements and attachment checklists","[{\"question\":\"What information is collected at the start of the MN-CPA-024 IPM inventory form?\",\"answer\":\"The form collects farm name/producer name, address, city, zip code, email, phone number, owner/operator, and the plan period.\"},{\"question\":\"Which types of attachments and maps are required for the resource concern assessment?\",\"answer\":\"It includes checked attachments such as location maps, general farm field information, farm and field maps, plan maps, soil maps, and multiple resource maps covering erosion tools, sensitive features, and groundwater/watershed-related mapping.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the form address pesticide handling and mitigation planning?\",\"answer\":\"It includes sections for pesticide handling practices, current pest control practices, soil/pesticide interaction hazard ratings (WIN-PST and leaching/runoff potential categories), and mitigation requirements with corresponding attachment checklists for chemical control options and BMPs.\"}]","Minnesota Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Inventory Form - MN-CPA-024 | DOCX",1788337404]