[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-243665-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":81,"doc-detail-243665-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","live-projects-require-live-quality-introduction-to-site-specific-quality-plans","Live Projects Require Live Quality - Introduction to Site-Specific Quality Plans","","Live Projects Require Live Quality outlines how Site-Specific Quality Plans (SSQP) keep relevance through team buy-in and ongoing follow-through beyond schedule completion. The material explains that quality risks persist at project handover and must be managed actively. It provides examples of primary and secondary quality risks across civil, concrete, framing, envelope, openings, energy, commissioning (MEP), cranes, design, and legal/operations impacts, plus risks driven by new designs, customers, subcontractors, market changes, staffing, processes, schedule, procurement, and AHJ requirements. It also maps SSQP purpose (why, what, who, how, when) and defines who participates.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/","Presentations",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/live-projects-require-live-quality-introduction-to-site-specific-quality-plans/243665/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/live-projects-require-live-quality-introduction-to-site-specific-quality-plans/243665.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Skyler","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-21","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"Why do live projects require live quality and SSQPs?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Site-Specific Quality Plans require team buy-in and follow-through to stay relevant. Quality risks remain even after schedule completion, so they must be actively managed.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What kinds of primary and secondary quality risks are addressed?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Primary risks include issues across civil, concrete, framing, envelope, openings, energy, commissioning (MEP), crane usage, design, and legal/ops impacts. Secondary risks include changes from new designs, customers, subcontractors, market/location, employees and training, processes, scheduling/ weather, procurement/logistics, budget concerns, and AHJ factors.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What should a Site Specific Quality Plan answer and how is it structured?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The plan should answer why, what, who, how, and when. It tracks risk items for successful resolution and defines risk scope, potential outcomes, severity, occurrence likelihood, mitigation methods, and accountable parties.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},243665,1791722348,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,87,92,97,102,107,112,117,122],{"id":55,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},90,"presentations",{"id":88,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":93,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":98,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":103,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":108,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":113,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":118,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":120,"slug":121},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":123,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":125},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":127},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":128,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":22,"category_id":55,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":103,"language":135,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":139,"read_time":140},2336464648746,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Live Projects Require Live Quality  \nMICA H STA NTO N  \nA p r il 2 0, 2 02 3  \nAGENDA  \n• Introduction to Site-Specific Quality Plans  \n• Examples of Quality Risks  \n• 5 Questions  \n• Summary  \nIntroduction to Site-Specific Quality Plans  \nSite-Specific Quality Plans require team buy-in and team follow-through to stay relevant to the project. Quality Risks are not gone at schedule completion.  \nExamples of Quality Risks  \nPri m a r y t o S econ d a r y  \nExamples of Primary quality risks  \n• Civil  \n• Concrete  \n• Framing – Wood/Steel/etc.  \n• Envelope – Roofing  \n• Openings  \n• High Energy  \n• Commissioning – MEP  \n• Usage of Cranes  \n• Design – Interior/Exterior  \n• Legal / Ops Impacts  \n• Others?  \nExamples of Secondary quality risks  \n• New Designs  \n• New Customers  \n• New Subcontractors  \n• New Market / Location  \n• New Employees – Training / Staffing  \n• New process – Prefabrication, modular components, etc .  \n• Schedule – phasing, pull planning, weather  \n• Procurement / Logistics  \n• Design – Interior/Exterior  \n• Budgetary concerns  \n• AHJ  \n• Others?  \nSite Specific Quality Plan should answer  \n1. Why?  \n2. What?  \n3. Who?  \n4. How  \n5. When?  \nLive pro jects req u ire live quality 2023 ~~ ~~ 7  \nWhy an effective Site-Specific Quality Plan?  \nRisk items should be tracked to successful resolution using tools that organize and prioritize quality risk items to provide a clear definition of the risk item, the potential outcomes, level of severity, and potential for occurrence or reoccurrence . Intention is to mitigate the quality risk, not to transfer the risk within the project or organization .  \nWhat is an effective Site-Specific Quality Plan?  \n• Identifies the quality risk scopes  \n• Identifies the intended outcomes  \n• Identifies specific needs of all project stakeholders  \n• Identifies alternative unintended outcomes  \n• Identifies mitigation methods  \n• Identifies accountable parties  \n• Identifies key contributing parties  \nWho is involved in an effective Site-Specific Quality Plan?  \n• Which project stakeholders should be engaged in developing the SSQP?  \n• Who will be responsible?  \n• Who will be accountable?  \n• Who will be consulted?  \n• Who will be informed?  \nProject Manager  \nProject Executive  \nProject Engineer  \nQuality Manger Superintendent  \nCustomer  \nArchitect  \nTrade Partners  \nTrade Partners  \nEngineer of Record","cbCaimcVbz3bLEfH","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimcVbz3bLEfH","pdf",926998,"English","# Introduction to Site-Specific Quality Plans\n## Examples of Quality Risks\n## Primary quality risks\n## Secondary quality risks\n## Site Specific Quality Plan should answer\n## Why an effective Site-Specific Quality Plan?\n## What is an effective Site-Specific Quality Plan?\n## Who is involved in an effective Site-Specific Quality Plan?","[{\"question\":\"Why do live projects require live quality and SSQPs?\",\"answer\":\"Site-Specific Quality Plans require team buy-in and follow-through to stay relevant. Quality risks remain even after schedule completion, so they must be actively managed.\"},{\"question\":\"What kinds of primary and secondary quality risks are addressed?\",\"answer\":\"Primary risks include issues across civil, concrete, framing, envelope, openings, energy, commissioning (MEP), crane usage, design, and legal/ops impacts. Secondary risks include changes from new designs, customers, subcontractors, market/location, employees and training, processes, scheduling/ weather, procurement/logistics, budget concerns, and AHJ factors.\"},{\"question\":\"What should a Site Specific Quality Plan answer and how is it structured?\",\"answer\":\"The plan should answer why, what, who, how, and when. It tracks risk items for successful resolution and defines risk scope, potential outcomes, severity, occurrence likelihood, mitigation methods, and accountable parties.\"}]","Live Projects Require Live Quality - Introduction to Site-Specific Quality Plans | PDF",1789206951,6]