[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-170523-105":53,"doc-detail-170523-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","literature-review-template-based-on-multiple-journal-article-reviews","Literature Review Template Based on Multiple Journal Article Reviews","","Structured template for writing an academic literature review grounded in five peer-reviewed journal articles. Guides reviewers through an introduction that states rationale and relevance, a synthesized summary of aims and methods, and a thematic analysis organized into 2–4 key issues. Includes critical synthesis of collective strengths, limitations, and evidence gaps, then links findings to professional practice implications, practical application steps, and a CPD reflection statement with claimed hours or points.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":46,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/paper-templates/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/literature-review-template-based-on-multiple-journal-article-reviews/170523/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/literature-review-template-based-on-multiple-journal-article-reviews/170523.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Caleb Sterling","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-07","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What sources does the template base the literature review on, and what should be included in the introduction?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"The template is designed for reviewing five peer-reviewed journal articles. The introduction should state the rationale for the review, the overarching topic or clinical area, and why it matters for professional practice.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"How should the thematic analysis section be organized?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The thematic analysis should be organized around 2–4 key themes or issues that emerge across the articles. Each theme should describe how it is addressed, noting similarities, contrasts, or evolving perspectives.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the template connect research findings to professional practice and CPD?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"It prompts a section on relevance to professional practice by discussing how the findings shape best practice, including implications for policy, procedure, or service delivery. It then asks for specific practice applications and a CPD reflection statement with CPD hours/points claimed.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},170523,1790088794,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":45,"category_name":46,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":76,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":9},962084925290,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","Literature Review Template Based on Multiple Journal Article Reviews\nReviewer Name: [Your Name]\u000bDate of Review: [DD/MM/YYYY]\u000bTopic/Theme of the Literature Review: [Define the overarching theme or clinical issue addressed across the five articles]\n1. Introduction\nProvide a brief introduction outlining the rationale for the review, the overarching topic or clinical area under investigation, and why it is relevant to professional practice. Mention the number and type of sources reviewed.\nExample:\u000bThis literature review examines recent research on [insert topic], drawing on five peer-reviewed journal articles published between [year range]. The selected articles explore key developments in [clinical area], with implications for evidence-based practice and ongoing professional learning.\n2. Summary of Reviewed Articles\nOffer a concise synthesis of the five articles, covering their aims, methodologies, and primary findings. Use comparative language where appropriate.\nOptional: Provide a paragraph summarising patterns or variations across the articles.\n3. Thematic Analysis\nOrganise this section around 2–4 key themes or issues that emerged across the articles.\nTheme 1: [Insert Theme Title]\u000bDescribe how the theme is addressed across the articles, noting similarities, contrasts, or evolving perspectives.\nTheme 2: [Insert Theme Title]\u000bDiscuss how the evidence presented across the five articles contributes to understanding this issue.\n(Continue as needed for additional themes.)\n4. Critical Synthesis\nReflect on the strengths and limitations of the collective body of literature reviewed.\nStrengths Identified Across Articles:\n[E.g., Robust methodologies, diverse populations, novel approaches]\nCommon Limitations and Gaps:\n[E.g., Small sample sizes, limited generalisability, absence of longitudinal data]\n5. Relevance to Professional Practice\nDiscuss how the findings across all five articles inform or challenge current professional or clinical practice.\nHow do these articles shape your understanding of best practice?\nAre there implications for policy, procedure, or service delivery?\nAre there identified areas requiring further practitioner training or development?\n6. Key Takeaways\nList the main professional insights gained from this body of literature.\n[Insight 1]\n[Insight 2]\n[Insight 3]\n7. Application to Practice\nOutline specific ways the knowledge gained will be integrated into your practice.\n[Practice change or enhancement 1]\n[Practice change or enhancement 2]\n[Practice change or enhancement 3]\n8. CPD Reflection Statement\nProvide a reflective summary describing how this literature review contributes to your continuing professional development.\nExample:\u000bEngaging with this body of research has deepened my understanding of [topic] and highlighted practical strategies for improving [specific aspect of practice]. It has also identified knowledge gaps that will guide future learning priorities.\nCPD Hours/Points Claimed: [Estimate based on CPD guidelines]\u000bSignature: [Your Signature]","cbCaib6UvrD6YQYd","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaib6UvrD6YQYd","docx",18336,"English","# Introduction\n# Summary of Reviewed Articles\n# Thematic Analysis\n# Critical Synthesis\n# Relevance to Professional Practice\n# Key Takeaways\n# Application to Practice\n# CPD Reflection Statement","[{\"question\":\"What sources does the template base the literature review on, and what should be included in the introduction?\",\"answer\":\"The template is designed for reviewing five peer-reviewed journal articles. The introduction should state the rationale for the review, the overarching topic or clinical area, and why it matters for professional practice.\"},{\"question\":\"How should the thematic analysis section be organized?\",\"answer\":\"The thematic analysis should be organized around 2–4 key themes or issues that emerge across the articles. Each theme should describe how it is addressed, noting similarities, contrasts, or evolving perspectives.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the template connect research findings to professional practice and CPD?\",\"answer\":\"It prompts a section on relevance to professional practice by discussing how the findings shape best practice, including implications for policy, procedure, or service delivery. It then asks for specific practice applications and a CPD reflection statement with CPD hours/points claimed.\"}]","Literature Review Template Based on Multiple Journal Article Reviews | DOCX",1788272583]