[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-204614-105":53,"doc-detail-204614-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","length-weight-relationship-and-relative-condition-factor-of-liza-subviridis-in-pinang-river-estuary-balik-pulau-penang-malaysia","Length-weight relationship and relative condition factor of Liza subviridis in Pinang River Estuary, Balik Pulau, Penang, Malaysia","","Length-weight relationship and relative condition factor (Kn) of greenback mullet Liza subviridis were estimated from 2,286 samples (635 males, 1,651 females) collected in Pinang River Estuary, Balik Pulau, Penang, Malaysia from March 2013 to February 2014. Relationships were W = 0.0117L2.9989 for pooled samples, W = 0.0157L2.8787 for males, and W = 0.0109L3.0284 for females. Female b value was higher than males (p\u003C0.05) with no significant seasonal effect (p>0.05). Mean Kn was 1.01±0.13; no significant wet-dry or sex differences were found (p>0.05).",{"@graph":63,"@context":122},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":51,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/length-weight-relationship-and-relative-condition-factor-of-liza-subviridis-in-pinang-river-estuary-balik-pulau-penang-malaysia/204614/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/length-weight-relationship-and-relative-condition-factor-of-liza-subviridis-in-pinang-river-estuary-balik-pulau-penang-malaysia/204614.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Emma Wilson","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-22","2026-09-05",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":73},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114,118],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"Where and when were the Liza subviridis samples collected?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"Samples were collected from Pinang River Estuary, Balik Pulau, Penang, Malaysia, from March 2013 to February 2014.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What length-weight equations were found for pooled samples, males, and females?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Pooled samples followed W = 0.0117L2.9989, males W = 0.0157L2.8787, and females W = 0.0109L3.0284.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Did the study find significant differences between wet and dry seasons for b values and Kn?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"No. Independent t-tests showed no significant differences between wet and dry seasons for both female b values (vs males) and for Kn (p>0.05).",{"name":119,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How did the relative condition factor (Kn) differ between sexes?",{"text":121,"@type":109},"Mean Kn was 1.01±0.13, and no significant difference was detected between male and female samples (p>0.05).","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":124,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":56},204614,1790115650,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":9,"category_id":50,"category_name":51,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":76,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":79,"language":139,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":143,"read_time":73},3848291630094,"https://eur-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","Indian J. Fish., 64(3): 106-109, 2017  \nDOI: 10.21077/ijf.2017.64.3.59178-15  \nNote  \nLength-weight relationship and relative condition factor of Liza subviridis (Valenciennes, 1836) in Pinang River Estuary, Balik Pulau, Penang, Malaysia  \nN. ZOLKHIFLEE, K. M. ZAIN, M. Y. HOSSAIN* AND K. YAHYA School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia  \n* University of Rajshahi, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Fisheries, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh e-mail: [khairun@usm.my](khairun@usm.my)  \nABSTRACT  \nLength-weight relationship and relative condition factor (Kn) of greenback mullet Liza subviridis (Valenciennes, 1836) were estimated from 2286 samples (635 males and 1651 females) collected from the Pinang River Estuary, Balik Pulau, Penang from March 2013 to February 2014. The length-weight relationship and growth pattern were: W = 0.0117 L2.9989 (isometric) for pooled samples (male and female together), W = 0.0157 L2.8787 (negative allometric) for males and W = 0.0109 L3.0284 (isometric) for females. Independent t-test showed that female b value was higher than that of the males (p\u003C0.05) with no significant difference between the wet and dry seasons (independent t-test, p>0.05) . The mean Kn ofL. subviridis was  \n1.01±0.13; however, no significant difference was detected between wet and dry seasons and between male and female samples (independent t-test, p>0.05) .  \nKeywords: Length-weight relationship, Liza subviridis, Relative condition factor, Wet and dry season  \nLength-weight relationship and coefficient of condition provide useful information for understanding the biology and ecology of fish in terms of estimating the average weight corresponding to a known length group (Froese, 2006) and in evaluating the relative well-being of a fish population (Bolger and Connolly, 1989) . This in turn would provide inputs for development of stock assessment models for sustainable management of fish inan aquatic ecosystem (Mendes et al., 2004) . The lengthweight relationship of fishes belonging to the family Mugilidae have been extensively studied worldwide (Moorthy et al., 2003; Lawson and Jimoh, 2010; Dankwa, 2011; Renjini and Nandan, 2011; Gondal et al.,2014) .  \nThe present study was undertaken to establish the length-weight relationship and relative condition factor of Liza subviridis (Valenciennes, 1836) in a small estuarine area of Pinang River Estuary, Balik Pulau, Penang, Malaysia, which is subjected to various anthropogenic activities. A few researchers have studied the same species in the Merbok Estuary of Kedah (Nor Aziella, 2012) and in the Vellar Estuary of India (Rahman et al., 2013) . However, these studies were conducted in large estuarine systems with less anthropogenic effect compared to the Pinang River Estuary considered in this study. A total of 2286 samples of L. subviridis were collected from March 2013 to February 2014 using gill net and cast net. The study site experienced wet season from June to November 2013 and dry season from March to May 2013 and December 2013 to February 2014 (Malaysian  \nMeteorology Department, 2013; 2014) . L. subviridis was identified from the morphometric and meristic features as per Harrison and Senou (1999) and Nor Aziella (2012) . The total length of the fishes sampled were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using measuring board and weighed to the nearest 1 g using a portable scale (OHAUS model LS2000) . The shape of the anus was used to differentiate the sex, which was further confirmed by examining the gonads after dissecting the abdomen.  \nThe length-weight relationship was calculated as W = aLb (Froese, 2006), where W is total weight (g), L is total length (cm) (from the tip of the snout to the tip of caudal fin), a is constant proportionality (intercept value) and b is allometry coefficient (slope) . The allometric equation was then changed to the linear form as: ln W = ln a + b ln L. The equation is the same as the linear equation Y = c + mX, where ln","cbCaiuEkw72KcsYv","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuEkw72KcsYv","pdf",329773,"English","# Abstract\n## Data source and sampling design\n## Length-weight models and allometry\n## Relative condition factor (Kn)\n## Statistical comparisons and key findings","[{\"question\":\"Where and when were the Liza subviridis samples collected?\",\"answer\":\"Samples were collected from Pinang River Estuary, Balik Pulau, Penang, Malaysia, from March 2013 to February 2014.\"},{\"question\":\"What length-weight equations were found for pooled samples, males, and females?\",\"answer\":\"Pooled samples followed W = 0.0117L2.9989, males W = 0.0157L2.8787, and females W = 0.0109L3.0284.\"},{\"question\":\"Did the study find significant differences between wet and dry seasons for b values and Kn?\",\"answer\":\"No. Independent t-tests showed no significant differences between wet and dry seasons for both female b values (vs males) and for Kn (p\\u003e0.05).\"},{\"question\":\"How did the relative condition factor (Kn) differ between sexes?\",\"answer\":\"Mean Kn was 1.01±0.13, and no significant difference was detected between male and female samples (p\\u003e0.05).\"}]","Length-weight relationship and relative condition factor of Liza subviridis in Pinang River Estuary, Balik Pulau, Penang, Malaysia | PDF",1788574381]