[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-242904-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":80,"doc-detail-242904-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","langston-university-5-year-academic-program-review-process-program-modifications-review-process-low-productivity-program-review","Langston University - 5-Year Academic Program Review Process - Program Modifications Review Process - Low Productivity Program Review","","Langston University outlines three connected governance workflows for evaluating academic programs under a statewide framework. The 5-year academic review process covers identification of scheduled programs, internal summary preparation, use of external accreditations when applicable, data provision by Institutional Research and Planning, and multi-level reviews culminating in Board of Regents and State Regents approvals. A separate modifications review process guides internal course/program form completion and committee submissions, while a low productivity review selects programs through Oklahoma State Regents procedures and requires completion of the low productivity template.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/","Presentations",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/langston-university-5-year-academic-program-review-process-program-modifications-review-process-low-productivity-program-review/242904/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/langston-university-5-year-academic-program-review-process-program-modifications-review-process-low-productivity-program-review/242904.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"McGucket","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-11","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":26},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What is the purpose of Langston University’s 5-year academic program review process?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"It evaluates proposed and existing academic programs, supporting decisions on quality, efficiency, and resource allocation while enabling state-level and campus-level determinations.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"Who reviews the completed 5-year program review summary?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"The Dean, the Associate Vice President for Assessment and Accreditation, and the VP for Academic Affairs review the completed summary, followed by review and recommendations from the University Academic Policies and Curriculum committee.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How are low productivity programs handled under the described process?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Programs identified as low productivity are selected by the Oklahoma State Regents, after which Program/Department Chairs complete a low productivity template and proceed through the defined steps.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},242904,1791730130,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,92,97,102,107,112,117,122],{"id":84,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},11,90,"presentations",{"id":88,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":93,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":98,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":103,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":108,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":113,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":118,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":120,"slug":121},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":123,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":125},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":127},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":128,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":22,"category_id":84,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":135,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":33,"language":136,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":140,"read_time":26},1236954412713,"https://us-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","Langston University  \n5-Year Academic Program Review Process  \n\n| Step 1 | Programs that are scheduled for the 5-year academic review will be identified. Certificates and program options that are embedded with programs are reviewed with their primary program. |\n| --- | --- |\n| Step 2 | Program/Department Chair will complete the program review summary template. |\n| Step 3 | Programs with external accreditations are used in lieu of the LU program review. |\n| Step 4 | Data on enrollment, graduates, and credit hours generated will be provided by the Office of Institutional Research and Planning |\n| Step 5 | The Dean will review the completed program review summary to address any questions or concerns. |\n| Step 6 | The Associate Vice President for Assessment and Accreditation will review the completed program review summary to address any questions or concerns. |\n| Step 7 | The VP for Academic Affairs will review the completed program review to address any questions or concerns. |\n| Step 8* | The University Academic Policies and Curriculum committee will review and forward final recommendations (accept/reject) to VP for Academic Affairs. |\n| Step 9 | Program Review document is submitted by the Vice President for Academic Affairs to the Oklahoma A&M Board of Regents for approval atthe October meeting. |\n| Step 10 | Program Review document is submitted by the President to the\u003Cbr>Chancellor of the Oklahoma State Regents for approval by December. |\n| Note | Program reviews must be in compliance with the Oklahoma State Regents before you can proceed with program modifications. |\n\n*Note: Step 8 was included on 10-28-2021 to add an additional layer of program review and approval.  \nLangston University  \n5-Year Academic Program Modifications Review Process  \n\n| Step 1 | Program/Department Chairs and Deans are notified of the active program scheduled for a 5-year program review. |\n| --- | --- |\n| Step 2 | Program/Department Chair will complete an internal course/program modification form. |\n| Step 3 | Department Dean will submit a request for curriculum/program changes to the University Academic Policies and Curriculum committee for approval. |\n| Step 4 | The Associate Vice President for Assessment and Accreditation will review the request for curriculum/program changes to address any questions or concerns. |\n| Step 5 | The University Academic Policies and Curriculum committee will address any questions or concerns with the program Chair regarding recommendations for programmatic or curriculum changes. |\n| Step 6 | The University Academic Policies and Curriculum committee will forward the internal course/program modification form with final recommendations (accept/reject) to the VP for Academic Affairs for review and approval. |\n| Step 7 | The VP for Academic Affairs will forward the final internal curriculum/program modification “to accept” recommendations to the University Faculty Senate for review. |\n| Step 8 | Program Review document is submitted by the Vice President for Academic Affairs to the Oklahoma A&M Board of Regents for approval. |\n| Step 9 | Program Review document is submitted by the President to the Chancellor of the Oklahoma State Regents for approval by the end of the calendar year. |\n| Note | Institutions may request to use external accreditation in lieu of a 5-year program review. |\n\nLow Productivity Program Review  \n1. Programs identified as low productivity will be selected by the Oklahoma State Regents.  \n2. Program/Department Chairs will complete the low productivity template and proceed to Step 4.  \nOSRHE Website: [https://www.okhighered.org/state-system/policy](https://www.okhighered.org/state-system/policy)procedures/2020/Chapter 3-July 2020.pdf  \nOKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION  \nACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW 3.7.1-Purpose  \nIn carrying out constitutional responsibilities within the framework of 70 O.S. §3208 (2001), the State Regents recognize the primary role of institutional faculty, administrators, and ","cbCaibrKYEmI1scJ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaibrKYEmI1scJ","pdf",187195,8,"English","# 5-Year Academic Program Review Process\n## 5-Year Academic Program Modifications Review Process\n## Low Productivity Program Review","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of Langston University’s 5-year academic program review process?\",\"answer\":\"It evaluates proposed and existing academic programs, supporting decisions on quality, efficiency, and resource allocation while enabling state-level and campus-level determinations.\"},{\"question\":\"Who reviews the completed 5-year program review summary?\",\"answer\":\"The Dean, the Associate Vice President for Assessment and Accreditation, and the VP for Academic Affairs review the completed summary, followed by review and recommendations from the University Academic Policies and Curriculum committee.\"},{\"question\":\"How are low productivity programs handled under the described process?\",\"answer\":\"Programs identified as low productivity are selected by the Oklahoma State Regents, after which Program/Department Chairs complete a low productivity template and proceed through the defined steps.\"}]","Langston University - 5-Year Academic Program Review Process - Program Modifications Review Process - Low Productivity Program Review | PDF",1789196669]