[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-279471-105":53,"doc-detail-279471-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":58,"keywords":59,"description":60,"schema_data":61,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","landlord-decisions-2020-0272-05","","Hearing notice and procedural context document a landlord-initiated dispute under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2018, addressing whether the tenant’s conduct unlawfully interfered with peaceful enjoyment and reasonable privacy. The record describes a month-to-month rental arrangement, rent payment details, and complaints from nearby residents and basement occupants about late-night visitor traffic, noise, police calls, and alleged drug-related activity. A termination notice effective 30 June 2020 is cited, with the landlord seeking an order for vacant possession.",{"@graph":62,"@context":118},[63,79,101],{"@type":64,"itemListElement":65},"BreadcrumbList",[66,70,73,76],{"item":67,"name":68,"@type":69,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":71,"name":10,"@type":69,"position":72},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":74,"name":41,"@type":69,"position":75},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":77,"name":58,"@type":69,"position":78},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/landlord-decisions-2020-0272-05/279471/",4,{"url":77,"name":58,"@type":80,"image":81,"author":86,"headline":58,"publisher":89,"fileFormat":92,"inLanguage":57,"description":60,"dateModified":93,"datePublished":94,"encodingFormat":92,"isAccessibleForFree":95,"interactionStatistic":96},"DigitalDocument",{"url":82,"@type":83,"width":84,"height":85},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/landlord-decisions-2020-0272-05/279471.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":87,"@type":88},"Ethan Miller","Person",{"url":67,"name":90,"@type":91},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-16",true,{"@type":97,"interactionType":98,"userInteractionCount":100},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":99},"ViewAction",13,{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What issue does the landlord raise in this hearing?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The landlord seeks an order for vacant possession, alleging the tenant contravened statutory peaceful enjoyment and reasonable privacy requirements.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What conduct did the landlord and witnesses report about the tenant’s visitors?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"They described frequent late-night visitors with ongoing activity, loud disturbances including screaming and yelling, and repeated police involvement.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What legal basis and effective date are cited for the termination notice?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The notice was issued under section 24 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2018 and had an effective termination date of 30 June 2020.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":77,"og:type":120,"og:title":58,"og:site_name":90,"og:description":60},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":77},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},279471,1789521357,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":87,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":58,"doc_description":60,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":100,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":47,"language":135,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":60,"update_tm":125,"read_time":72},687207017582,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","notice of the hearing to the tenant, by e-mail, on 16 July 2020 and a copy of thee-mail was submitted with her application. The tenant has had 25 days to provide a response. As the tenant was properly served, and as any further delay in these proceedings would unfairly disadvantage the landlord, I proceeded with the hearing in her absence.  \n7. The landlord called the following witnesses:  \n􀁸  (“ ”)– neighbour residing at   \n􀁸  (“ ”)– tenant residing at   \nIssue 1 : Vacant Possession of Rented Premises  \nRelevant Submissions  \nThe Landlord’s Position  \n8. The landlord stated that she had entered into a month-to-month rental agreement with the tenant on 15 July 2018 and a copy of an Intent to Rent Letter was submitted with her application. The agreed rent was set at $800.00 per month and the landlord stated that it was paid on the tenant’s behalf by Newfoundland Labrador Housing and the Department of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour.  \n9. The rental unit at  is a main floor apartment and the landlord also rents out the basement apartment beneath the tenant’s unit  ) . That basement apartment is currently occupied by her daughter ) and her daughter’s spouse. They moved in on 15 February 2020.  \n10. Prior to 15 February 2020, the occupant of the basement apartment had made several complaints to the landlord about the amount of visitors coming to the tenant’s apartment and he had also complained about the accompanying noise. This lead to him terminating his agreement with the landlord.  \n11. After  moved into that apartment, the landlord stated that she started receiving the same sorts of complaints. The landlord stated that  and  had informed her that there is a constant stream of visitors showing up at the tenant’s unit at all hours of the night and they have been causing a lot of disturbances, resulting in several police visits.  \n12. The landlord also stated that she had been speaking to the tenant after she had received these complaints and the tenant informed her that these visits all have to do with illegal drug use.  \n13.  was called as a witness. She testified that since early April 2020, the tenant has been having a large amount of people visit her unit every night. She claimed that people would start showing up at the tenant’s apartment around 9:00 pm and there would be constant traffic until about 8:00 am the following day.  stated  \nthat it was busiest between 2:00 am and 5:00 am and she claimed that these visits are short and typically only last between 5 and 15 minutes.  \n14.  complained that the tenant’s visitors are oftentimes very loud and she testified that she had to call the police on 3 or 4 occasions because she could hear screaming and yelling coming from the tenant’s unit.  stated that because of all this noise she has not been able to get any sleep in the eveningsand she even complained that the noise has been affecting the mental well-being of her pet dogs.  \n15.  also stated that she suspected that there was illegal drug activity taking place at the tenant’s apartment and that this was part of the reason the tenant was having so many people visit her unit each night. She claimed that she had found wrappers for syringes on her property and she also claimed that the tenant’smother had told her that the tenant was going to use a “flush kit” to conceal the fact that she was taking drugs.  \n16.  also recounted an incident one night when the tenant’s visitors had been shining flashlights into her apartment windows.  \n17.  is a neighbour of the tenant and he was called as a witness as well. He gave an account similar to that given by  about what had been happening at the tenant’s apartment. He corroborated her claim that the tenant has been having alot of visitors coming and going late at night and through the early hours of the morning. He complained that these visitors are very noisy and that police have had to be called on numerous occasions.  \n18.  also stated that there is a heightened sense of insecu","cbCaid22XN6xxlud","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaid22XN6xxlud","pdf",419098,"English","# Relevant Submissions\n## The Landlord’s Position\n# Analysis\n## Statutory conditions and notice under section 24","[{\"question\":\"What issue does the landlord raise in this hearing?\",\"answer\":\"The landlord seeks an order for vacant possession, alleging the tenant contravened statutory peaceful enjoyment and reasonable privacy requirements.\"},{\"question\":\"What conduct did the landlord and witnesses report about the tenant’s visitors?\",\"answer\":\"They described frequent late-night visitors with ongoing activity, loud disturbances including screaming and yelling, and repeated police involvement.\"},{\"question\":\"What legal basis and effective date are cited for the termination notice?\",\"answer\":\"The notice was issued under section 24 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2018 and had an effective termination date of 30 June 2020.\"}]","landlord-decisions-2020-0272-05 | PDF"]