[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-353534-105":53,"doc-detail-353534-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","kcrha-corrective-action-plan-cap-may-22-2026","KCRHA Corrective Action Plan (CAP) - May 22, 2026","","KCRHA submits a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) in response to the Clark Nuber forensic evaluation and the April 22, 2026 letter from the City of Seattle and King County. The CAP addresses deficiencies in financial management, reconciliation, documentation, internal controls, and governance oversight, with emphasis on rebuilding trust through execution, verification, and sustained oversight. It establishes a structured implementation framework, initial 60-day priorities, milestone-based reporting, and an external stabilization approach to create a shared baseline and support urgent remediation while maintaining continuity of core regional functions.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/kcrha-corrective-action-plan-cap-may-22-2026/353534/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/kcrha-corrective-action-plan-cap-may-22-2026/353534.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Mabel","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-14","2026-09-22",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What triggered the KCRHA Corrective Action Plan (CAP)?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"The CAP was submitted in response to the Clark Nuber forensic evaluation and the April 22, 2026 letter from the City of Seattle and King County.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Which areas does the CAP aim to correct?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"It targets deficiencies in financial management, reconciliation, documentation, internal controls, and governance oversight, and focuses on strengthening and standardizing practices to be reliable, auditable, and visible.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What are KCRHA’s first 60-day implementation priorities?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"KCRHA will prioritize receivables categorization related to the approximately $8M finding; reconciliation schedule refinement; completion of fund advance inventory and template roll-forward; updated administrative overspend status and forecasts; and formalization of checklists, reporting packages, and the implementation dashboard, among other listed deliverables.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},353534,1791351892,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":142},7971474920318,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/74000ee537e6b0ca360?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1788430171632181674","Transmittal Memo  \nTo: Mayor Katie Wilson; Executive Girmay Zahilay;  \nCc: KCRHA Governing Board  \nFrom: Dr. Kelly Kinnison, Chief Executive Officer  \nDate: May 22, 2026  \nRe: Transmittal of KCRHA Corrective Action Plan  \nAttached is KCRHA’s Corrective Action Plan (CAP), submitted in response to the Clark Nuber forensic evaluation and the April 22, 2026 letter from the City of Seattle and King County.  \nKCRHA recognizes the seriousness of the findings and observations identified through the forensic evaluation. The deficiencies identified in financial management, reconciliation, documentation, internal controls, and governance oversight require substantial corrective action. They also require KCRHA to rebuild confidence through demonstrated execution, documentation, verification, and sustained oversight.  \nThe attached CAP is intended to serve two functions. First, it provides a direct corrective action response to the financial, accounting, control, and governance issues identified through the forensic evaluation. Second, it provides a stabilization and decision-support framework for regional leaders as we evaluate the future-state operating model for KCRHA and the broader homelessness response infrastructure in King County.  \nOur goal is to address the findings promptly, while also protecting provider payment continuity, Continuum of Care responsibilities, HMIS/Data Hub infrastructure, Coordinated Entry, and other core regional functions that now operate through KCRHA. The CAP proposes a structured implementation framework that includes Finance Committee oversight, milestone-based reporting, corrective action tracking, funder coordination, and external stabilization support where approved. The plan is built around recurring review, documentation, external support where needed, and transparent escalation of unresolved risks to funders and Governing Board.  \nMany activities identified in the CAP are already occurring in some form as part of KCRHA’s continuous improvement efforts related to day-to-day finance, contracting, reimbursement, compliance, and governance operations. The corrective action focus is to strengthen, document, standardize, reconcile, and govern those practices so they are reliable, auditable, and visible through a CAP dashboard and Finance Committee oversight.  \nInitial 60-Day Implementation Priorities  \nOver the first 60 days following submission of the CAP, KCRHA will prioritize the following implementation deliverables:  \n• initial categorization of the receivables associated with the approximately $8M finding;  \n• development or refinement of the KCIP/cash-flow reconciliation schedule;  \n• completion of the fund advance inventory and roll-forward template;  \n• updated administrative overspend status and administrative budget forecast;  \n• confirmation of immediate control enhancements related to reimbursements, gift cards, P-cards, and segregation of duties;  \n• update and formalization of the monthly close checklist and financial reporting package;  \n• formalization of the CAP implementation dashboard and Finance Committee reporting cadence;  \n• proposed scope and decision pathway for external stabilization support;  \n• structured City/County/KCRHA work sessions on reimbursement, advances, receivables, and cash-flow model issues.  \nThese priorities are intended to establish Phase I of the implementation workplan and statusreporting structure. Completion of specific items may depend on available staffing capacity, funder coordination, documentation availability, procurement timing, and approval of external stabilization support.  \nA central feature of the CAP is KCRHA’s recommendation for external stabilization support. This is a practical, time-limited way to establish a credible current-state baseline, validate priority financial issues, support urgent remediation, and help KCRHA, the City, and the County work from a shared source of truth. KCRHA is not proposing an open-ended consulting engagement; a","cbCaimRkwkUS9hoY","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimRkwkUS9hoY","pdf",797374,157,"English","# Acronyms and Key Terms\n# CAP at a Glance\n# I. Executive Introduction\n# II. Direct Response to the Forensic Evaluation\n# III. Corrective Action by Evaluation Theme\n# IV. Implementation, Oversight, Owners, and Dates\n# V. External Stabilization and Shared Operating Model\n# VI. Continuity / Future-State Regional Infrastructure\n# VII. Conclusion\n# Appendix A—Corrective Action Matrix by Forensic Evaluation Theme\n# Appendix B—30/60/90 Day Implementation Workplan and Dashboard Structure\n# Appendix C—External Stabilization Support Scope and Objectives\n# Appendix D—KCIP, Cost-Reimbursement, Cash Advances, and Working-Capital","[{\"question\":\"What triggered the KCRHA Corrective Action Plan (CAP)?\",\"answer\":\"The CAP was submitted in response to the Clark Nuber forensic evaluation and the April 22, 2026 letter from the City of Seattle and King County.\"},{\"question\":\"Which areas does the CAP aim to correct?\",\"answer\":\"It targets deficiencies in financial management, reconciliation, documentation, internal controls, and governance oversight, and focuses on strengthening and standardizing practices to be reliable, auditable, and visible.\"},{\"question\":\"What are KCRHA’s first 60-day implementation priorities?\",\"answer\":\"KCRHA will prioritize receivables categorization related to the approximately $8M finding; reconciliation schedule refinement; completion of fund advance inventory and template roll-forward; updated administrative overspend status and forecasts; and formalization of checklists, reporting packages, and the implementation dashboard, among other listed deliverables.\"}]","KCRHA Corrective Action Plan (CAP) - May 22, 2026 | PDF",1790105948,55]