[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-160740-105":53,"doc-detail-160740-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","jbi-protocol-template-scoping-reviews-2024","JBI Protocol Template - Scoping Reviews 2024","","JBI scoping review protocol template for 2024, providing standardized structure to define objectives, background rationale, and inclusion criteria using the PCC framework (participants, concept, context). The template specifies required components for the abstract, including methods for searching and selecting evidence, study selection and data extraction approach, and guidance on how to report results and conclusions for reviews. It also details sections for review question(s), participants/concept/context eligibility, types of sources, and JBI-methods alignment, including expected acknowledgements of deviations and limitations.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/jbi-protocol-template-scoping-reviews-2024/160740/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/jbi-protocol-template-scoping-reviews-2024/160740.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Himbo","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-20","2026-08-30",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":76},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What is the core structure required for the scoping review abstract in this template?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The abstract must include an objective, a brief introduction and inclusion criteria summary, methods (sources searched, search date for reviews, limits, and selection/extraction approach), plus results and conclusions only for reviews.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How should inclusion criteria be formulated?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Inclusion criteria should be summarized using the PCC framework: participants, concept, and context, with relevant exclusions stated in paragraph form rather than under separate subheadings.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What types of evidence sources are eligible in the proposed scoping review?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The template includes experimental and quasi-experimental designs, analytical observational studies, descriptive observational studies, and qualitative studies, and it can also consider systematic reviews and text/opinion papers depending on the research question.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},160740,1788079897,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":76,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":125,"read_time":76},687197100911,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/a000239b6f1da00475?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1785132997149421697","Add Title Here\nAuthors\nFirst author name1 Second author name2  Third author name3 Fourth author name4 Fifth author name5 Sixth author name6\u000b\u000b1. Affiliation\u000b2. Affiliation\u000b3. Affiliation\u000b4. Affiliation\u000b5. Affiliation\u000b6. Affiliation\nAbstract\n(Maximum - 250 words for Protocols/500 words for Reviews)\nObjective: State an overarching review objective structured using the key components of the inclusion criteria (approximately one or two sentences). e.g. The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to (insert field).\nIntroduction: Briefly describe the rationale for the review in light of what is already known on the topic (approximately two to three sentences).\nInclusion criteria: Summarize the inclusion criteria using the participants, concept, and context (PCC framework) and highlight any relevant exclusions in paragraph format. Present the information in one to three sentences – NOT under individual subheadings.\nMethods: List the key information sources searched/to be searched (those from which the majority of evidence sources were/will be located), the date (month/year) the search was conducted (for reviews only) and any search limits (e.g. language). Briefly describe the approach to study selection, data extraction, analysis of the evidence and presentation of the results. Briefly describe any notable deviations to the methodological approach taken (for reviews only).\nResults (For Reviews ONLY): The bulk of the abstract should be reserved to convey the main results of the review in relation to the objective/question. Report the number and type of included evidence as well as any pertinent study characteristics.\nConclusions (For Reviews ONLY): Provide a conclusion based on a general interpretation of the review findings in line with the review’s objective/s and any limitations of the review. Briefly convey key implications of the findings for practice and research (if any).\nKeywords: List a maximum of five keywords in alphabetical order, separated by a semi-colon and a space. Ideally these words should be different to those that appear in the title and abstract. These are for the purposes of meta-data and indexing, and not related to the search strategy.\nIntroduction\nDescribe the rationale for the review considering what is already known on the topic, including information that supports and justifies the selection of inclusion criteria. Key terms should be defined, and operational definitions narratively explained. Furthermore, provide some indication that there is evidence available that will meet your inclusion criteria. A rationale as to why a scoping review was the most appropriate method should also be provided. (Approximately 1000 words). For Reviews ONLY: The introduction must NOT be a verbatim reproduction of the introduction in the corresponding protocol.\nSubheading (if required)\nEdit set text as appropriate:\nA preliminary search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI Evidence Synthesis was conducted and no current or underway systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified.\nIf there are any existing systematic reviews/scoping reviews, it should be specified how the proposed review will differ.\nConclude with an overarching review objective, that captures and aligns with the core elements/PCC framework of the inclusion criteria (e.g. The objective of this scoping review is to assess the extent of the literature insert area/field.\nReview question\nGuidance for authors: Clearly state the review question or questions using the PCC framework (i.e. additional or sub-questions) that the review seeks to answer. The review question/s should clearly relate to the objective/s.\nInclusion criteria\nParticipants\nGuidance for authors: Describe/define participants that will be included. Specific exclusion criteria based on any participant characteristics should also be stated.\nConcept\nGuidance for authors: Describe and/or define the concept. S","cbCaid7AXW03TKQ4","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaid7AXW03TKQ4","docx",27805,7,"English","# Abstract\n# Introduction\n# Review question\n# Inclusion criteria\n## Participants\n## Concept\n## Context\n# Types of sources\n# Methods","[{\"question\":\"What is the core structure required for the scoping review abstract in this template?\",\"answer\":\"The abstract must include an objective, a brief introduction and inclusion criteria summary, methods (sources searched, search date for reviews, limits, and selection/extraction approach), plus results and conclusions only for reviews.\"},{\"question\":\"How should inclusion criteria be formulated?\",\"answer\":\"Inclusion criteria should be summarized using the PCC framework: participants, concept, and context, with relevant exclusions stated in paragraph form rather than under separate subheadings.\"},{\"question\":\"What types of evidence sources are eligible in the proposed scoping review?\",\"answer\":\"The template includes experimental and quasi-experimental designs, analytical observational studies, descriptive observational studies, and qualitative studies, and it can also consider systematic reviews and text/opinion papers depending on the research question.\"}]","JBI Protocol Template - Scoping Reviews 2024 | DOCX"]