[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-246034-105":53,"doc-detail-246034-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","jbi-critical-appraisal-checklist-for-systematic-reviews-and-research-syntheses-2017","JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses - 2017","","Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools support evidence-based healthcare by guiding rigorous assessment and synthesis across diverse review types. The checklist targets systematic reviews by evaluating how review questions and inclusion criteria are stated, whether search strategies and adequacy of sources are appropriate, and how appraisal is performed independently by multiple reviewers. It also addresses data extraction error minimization, suitability of study-combination methods, publication bias assessment, and whether recommendations for policy, practice, and new research are justified by reported data.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/jbi-critical-appraisal-checklist-for-systematic-reviews-and-research-syntheses-2017/246034/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/jbi-critical-appraisal-checklist-for-systematic-reviews-and-research-syntheses-2017/246034.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Noah","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What is the purpose of JBI critical appraisal in systematic reviews?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"To assess methodological quality and determine whether the study design, conduct, and analysis have addressed the possibility of bias. The appraisal results inform synthesis and interpretation.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"How should critical appraisal be conducted for included studies?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"All selected papers should be subjected to rigorous appraisal by two critical appraisers, typically conducted independently.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What information is used to decide overall appraisal outcomes?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"Each item is answered using yes, no, unclear, or not applicable, and then an overall appraisal includes options such as Include, Exclude, or Seek further info, with comments and reasons.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},246034,1791621585,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":76},8796095462418,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/80000253c1241d02b47?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1778826106357471780","The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews  \nChecklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses  \n[http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html](http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html)  \n  [www.joannabriggs.org](www.joannabriggs.org)  \nThe Joanna Briggs Institute  \nIntroduction  \nThe Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) is an international, membership based research and development organization within the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of Adelaide. The Institute specializes in promoting and supporting evidence-based healthcare by providing access to resources for professionals in nursing, midwifery, medicine, and allied health. With over 80 collaborating centres and entities, servicing over 90 countries, the Institute is a recognized global leader in evidence-based healthcare.  \nJBI Systematic Reviews  \nThe core of evidence synthesis is the systematic review of literature of a particular intervention, condition or issue. The systematic review is essentially an analysis of the available literature (that is, evidence) and a judgment of the effectiveness or otherwise of a practice, involving a series of complex steps. The JBI takes a particular view on what counts as evidence and the methods utilized to synthesize those different types of evidence. In line with this broader view of evidence, the Institute has developed theories, methodologies and rigorous processes for the critical appraisal and synthesis of these diverse forms of evidence in order to aid in clinical decision-making in health care. There now exists JBI guidance for conducting reviews of effectiveness research, qualitative research, prevalence/incidence, etiology/risk, economic evaluations, text/opinion, diagnostic test accuracy, mixed-methods, umbrella reviews and scoping reviews. Further information regarding JBI systematic reviews can be found in the JBI Reviewer’s Manual on our website.  \nJBI Critical Appraisal Tools  \nAll systematic reviews incorporate a process of critique or appraisal of the research evidence. The purpose of this appraisal is to assess the methodological quality of a study and to determine the extent to which a study has addressed the possibility of bias in its design, conduct and analysis. All papers selected for inclusion in the systematic review (that is – those that meet the inclusion criteria described in the protocol) need to be subjected to rigorous appraisal by two critical appraisers. The results of this appraisal can then be used to inform synthesis and interpretation of the results of the study. JBI Critical appraisal tools have been developed by the JBI and collaborators and approved by the JBI Scientific Committee following extensive peer review. Although designed for use in systematic reviews, JBI critical appraisal tools can also be used when creating Critically Appraised Topics (CAT), in journal clubs and asan educational tool.  \nJBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses  \nReviewer Date Author  Year Record Number   \n1. Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated?  \n2. Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?  \n3. Was the search strategy appropriate?  \n4. Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate?  \n5. Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate?  \n6. Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently?  \n7. Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction?  \n8. Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate?  \n9. Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?  \n10. Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data?  \n11. Were the specific directives for new research appropriate?  \nYes  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□  \nNo  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□  \nUnclear  \nNot  \napplicable  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□□  \n□  \nOverall appraisal: Include □ ","cbCaicMqXkqGfyP9","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicMqXkqGfyP9","pdf",687881,7,"English","# JBI Systematic Reviews\n## Evidence synthesis and guidance\n# JBI Critical Appraisal Tools\n## Purpose and use\n# JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses\n## Review questions (items 1-11)\n## Overall appraisal and comments","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of JBI critical appraisal in systematic reviews?\",\"answer\":\"To assess methodological quality and determine whether the study design, conduct, and analysis have addressed the possibility of bias. The appraisal results inform synthesis and interpretation.\"},{\"question\":\"How should critical appraisal be conducted for included studies?\",\"answer\":\"All selected papers should be subjected to rigorous appraisal by two critical appraisers, typically conducted independently.\"},{\"question\":\"What information is used to decide overall appraisal outcomes?\",\"answer\":\"Each item is answered using yes, no, unclear, or not applicable, and then an overall appraisal includes options such as Include, Exclude, or Seek further info, with comments and reasons.\"}]","JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses - 2017 | PDF",1789232854]