[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-253173-105":53,"doc-detail-253173-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","interreg-knowledge-fair-session-report-project-closure-2021-2027-march-2024","Interreg Knowledge Fair session report - Project closure 2021-2027 - March 2024","","Interreg Knowledge Fair session report summarizing preparation for project closure in the 2021–2027 programming period. The discussion centers on the HIT Core Group final progress report template, distinguishing obligatory and voluntary elements, then reviews key end-of-project checks such as ultimate output and results indicator verification, quality assurance of delivered outputs (including SCO-specific outputs), durability assessment, partner cooperation after closure, and IT systems readiness. Updates on Jems technical solutions and programme approaches are also covered, including harmonisation needs and checklist defaults within Jems.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/interreg-knowledge-fair-session-report-project-closure-2021-2027-march-2024/253173/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/interreg-knowledge-fair-session-report-project-closure-2021-2027-march-2024/253173.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Arica Lee","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-27","2026-09-13",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",13,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What template and reporting elements are discussed for project closure in 2021-2027?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"The session is built around the final progress report template prepared by the HIT Core Group, including obligatory and voluntary elements.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Which checks are highlighted for closing projects?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"Key checks include verification of ultimate output/results indicators, quality checks of delivered outputs (including SCO-specific outputs), durability checks, and preparation of IT systems for closure.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What improvements does the session propose for the closure process?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"Programmes ask for harmonised procedures across programmes, default optional-field checklists in Jems, and more streamlined evaluation and monitoring processes beyond closure.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},253173,1791450669,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":73,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":9},8796096645457,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/800003749518d68ffe3?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779345340919836971","Project closure 2021-2027  \nInterreg Knowledge Fair session report | March 2024  \nOverview  \nThe session focused on various aspects regarding preparation to projects closure in 2021- 2027 programming period. The backbone for the discussion (what is really needed, what isnot for the project closure) was presentation of the final progress report template-prepared by the HIT Core Group. The report composes of obligatory and voluntary elements.  \nThis was followed by the reflections on other elements related to projects end such as: ultimate output/results indicators check, quality check of delivered outputs (including SCOs specific outputs – lump sums), durability check, cooperation with project partners after projects closure, IT systems preparation for projects' closure.  \nDuring the session the updates on technical solutions in Jems regarding projects closure were also presented.  \nMethodology  \nPresentation of HIT closure report followed by the exchange with programmes on various aspects of project closure. As there are no big changes in requirements between previous and current programming periods, the experiences from 2014-2020 can utilized for the future simplifications and harmonisations. Discussions focused on:  \n1. programmes' approaches for indicators verification after project's closure;  \n2. cooperation after project's closure among partners and with project's institutions;  \n3. partner's involvement in programme improvements;  \n4. documents storage obligation;  \n5. preparation of IT systems for project's closure.  \nKey discussion points  \nWhat is working?  \nHIT is clearly evolving in terms of project closure. The first HIT could not agree on a template for the project closure report, this HIT managed to agree on a template with a high level of flexibility. Let’s hope the next HIT can streamline this even further.  \nProgrammes were positive about the implementation of HIT and the solution presented in Jems.  \nDue to the nature of the certain types of projects (e.g. with the infrastructure components), reports on the indicators are submitted sometime after project closure. This allows programmes for further exchanges with beneficiaries regarding the future of the partnership, feedback on the programme 'user-friendliness' and on the future challenges. These can help in better adjusting future calls and responding to applicants' needs.  \nWhat requires repairing / improvements?  \nThe high level of optionality on the fields from section C3 till C7 reflects the procedures of the different programmes (some programmes collect necessary information through other sources than the closure report) . Harmonisation on the procedure’s programmes have for closing projects could be improved. Also, the way checks for project closure beyond thereport seem to be different for different programmes points out that streamlining can be done on the closure procedures from programmes.  \nWhat is missing?  \nProgrammes requested that the HIT template for optional fields will be present in Jems as a default checklist.  \nWhat would be your vision for the future?  \nProgrammes are not yet at project closure for the 2021-2027 period but it seems that further exchanges on processes and procedures in regards to project's closure are very much welcome. If programmes could do a step into streamlining evaluation of project closure and having similar processes to monitoring progress beyond closure right now. More streamlined templates could be agreed in a future programme period.  \nRegulations and articles of particular significance  \nCommon Provisions Regulation 65 Interreg regulation 36  \nConclusions, plans for followed up  \nFrom 2025 webinars on exchanges on processes and procedures in regards to project's closure.  \nSession leader: Grzegorz Gołda  \nDelivery team: Grzegorz Gołda, Pieter Louwers  \nReport drafted by: Grzegorz Gołda","cbCaicr0ypTfk4TC","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicr0ypTfk4TC","pdf",135353,"English","# Overview\n## Session focus and report template structure\n# Methodology\n## Exchange with programmes and key discussion areas\n# Key discussion points\n## What is working?\n## What requires repairing / improvements?\n## What is missing?\n## Vision for the future\n# Regulations and articles of particular significance\n# Conclusions, plans for followed up","[{\"question\":\"What template and reporting elements are discussed for project closure in 2021-2027?\",\"answer\":\"The session is built around the final progress report template prepared by the HIT Core Group, including obligatory and voluntary elements.\"},{\"question\":\"Which checks are highlighted for closing projects?\",\"answer\":\"Key checks include verification of ultimate output/results indicators, quality checks of delivered outputs (including SCO-specific outputs), durability checks, and preparation of IT systems for closure.\"},{\"question\":\"What improvements does the session propose for the closure process?\",\"answer\":\"Programmes ask for harmonised procedures across programmes, default optional-field checklists in Jems, and more streamlined evaluation and monitoring processes beyond closure.\"}]","Interreg Knowledge Fair session report - Project closure 2021-2027 - March 2024 | PDF",1789264535]