[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-392627-105":53,"doc-detail-392627-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","interior-design-management-in-practice-a-theoretical-framework","Interior Design Management in Practice - A Theoretical Framework","","Interior design management is examined as an emerging, identity-forming field within the built environment, distinct from architecture yet bound by evolving boundaries. Using a triangulated grounded-theory ethnographic case study, the research identifies how management is practiced across project, practice, and design-process levels in Australia and Malaysia. Six practice domains are derived from interviews, artefacts, conversations, and observation, culminating in a synthesised theoretical framework and four practice typologies.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":46,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/paper-templates/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/interior-design-management-in-practice-a-theoretical-framework/392627/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/interior-design-management-in-practice-a-theoretical-framework/392627.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Nguyễn Văn Học","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-07","2026-09-25",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What problem does the study address about interior design?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"Interior design is described as still emerging and struggling to establish its identity, with debates about defining core knowledge versus becoming more flexible and undisciplined.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"How was the research conducted?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"A triangulated grounded-theory ethnographic informed case study was used, combining interviews, artefacts, conversations, and observations across practice levels.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What outputs did the study produce?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"The study generated six domains characterising interior design management in practice, then synthesised them into a theoretical framework that highlights relationships between practice structure, services, project types, and design disciplines.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},392627,1791178765,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":45,"category_name":46,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":142},1374402739827,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/14000c97e7351f1a627?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1787885694763230660","INTERIOR DESIGN MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK  \nZulkarnain Hazim  \nMSc.  \nSubmitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of  \nDoctor of Philosophy  \nSchool of Design  \nCreative Industries Faculty  \nQueensland University of Technology  \nAbstract  \nAs most commonly practiced, interior design is a specialist area of the built environment industry concerned with the internal spaces of buildings and how they function and have meaning socially, psychologically and existentially. However, interior design, unlike other spatial disciplines such as architecture, is still emerging, and in this respect, struggling to develop and establish its identity. On the one hand, there is the argument for the profession of interior design to better define its core body knowledge, and in so doing establish firmer boundaries between itself and other professions such as architecture. On the other hand, are calls for it to become more ‘undisciplined’, for the boundaries to be more flexible and the connections more fluid, in order for it to be more responsive to changing social and environmental conditions.  \nFundamental to both positions is the urgent need, as expressed by the International Federation of Interior Architects/Designers (IFI), for the interior design profession to,“better understand its business, culture, knowledge, and identity”. In response, the study employed atriangulated approach involving a grounded theory ethnographic informed case study to reveal the nature of interior design management as currently practiced in Australia and Malaysia, atthe practice, project and design process levels. Three different types of interior design practices in two culturally diverse cities (Brisbane and Kuala Lumpur) were chosen and studied in terms of their actions, interactions and processes.  \nDuring analysis of the data involving interviews, artefacts, conversations and observations of the selected practice cases, six domains emerged that characterised the nature of interior design management in practice. Expression of existence, the first domain described, focuses on market positioning and relevancy. The second dimension, workplace milieu, further explores practice as a cultural setting and from this position focuses on the values, mores, attitudes that characterise particular practice settings. The issue of competency is then acknowledged in the form of its own domain revealing issues to do with professional knowledge, skills, experience and predispositions. Variable factors examine more closely the internal and external factors, which impact the practices and their management. Other views of management are also revealed through the domain that examines how the practices manage the relationship between output and quality. In this respect, mechanisms and processes for  \nregulating and controlling become more evident. The last domain of polemics recognises the frustrations and anxieties of practice and their main sources. As revealed, these are both internal and external.  \nThese domain outcomes are then brought together in a more synthesised way as a theoretical framework. The framework constitutes the theory generation expected of agrounded theory approach. As conveyed in the theoretical framework, specific relationships are highlighted involving organisational structure and scale of the practice, the types of services provided, and the scale and types of projects undertaken. Further to this, the framework emphasises practice as a cultural milieu with particular values, mores, attitudes and physical settings, and which, in this study, contributed to the identification and characterization of four practice typologies revealing specific kinds of relationships between interior design and other design disciplines such as architecture.  \nAs such, the framework was central to providing a structural understanding of interior design practice and how its identity is very much tied to the diverse ways in which it is practiced;","cbCaiphWvdzq82so","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiphWvdzq82so","pdf",8916671,242,"English","# CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION\n## 1.1 PROLOGUE\n## 1.2 CONTEXT","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the study address about interior design?\",\"answer\":\"Interior design is described as still emerging and struggling to establish its identity, with debates about defining core knowledge versus becoming more flexible and undisciplined.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the research conducted?\",\"answer\":\"A triangulated grounded-theory ethnographic informed case study was used, combining interviews, artefacts, conversations, and observations across practice levels.\"},{\"question\":\"What outputs did the study produce?\",\"answer\":\"The study generated six domains characterising interior design management in practice, then synthesised them into a theoretical framework that highlights relationships between practice structure, services, project types, and design disciplines.\"}]","Interior Design Management in Practice - A Theoretical Framework | PDF",1790371913,85]