[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-239366-105":53,"doc-detail-239366-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","integrated-master-schedule-ims-critical-path-analysis-version-6-01-candidate-draft","INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMS) - Critical Path Analysis - Version 6-01 - Candidate Draft","","Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) critical path analysis document describing schedule quality assessment, review methodology, and critical path identification for complex ocean leadership consortium planning. It summarizes the 4-point IMS quality review process and presents results from the Steelray Analyzer, including criteria for evaluation and discussion of findings and resolutions. Version 6-01 (2011-04-29) updates formatting and edits for the PY2 review cycle, with detailed counts across common IMS issues and task constraints.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/integrated-master-schedule-ims-critical-path-analysis-version-6-01-candidate-draft/239366/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/integrated-master-schedule-ims-critical-path-analysis-version-6-01-candidate-draft/239366.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Melati","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What is the document’s main purpose?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"To analyze the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) using critical path analysis and structured schedule quality review, then present Steelray Analyzer findings and resolutions.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"What review methodologies are included?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The document includes a schedule quality review and a Steelray Analyzer review, as well as a 4-point IMS quality review approach.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Which types of schedule issues does the Steelray Analyzer report focus on?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"It evaluates topics such as baseline schedule integration errors, effort and milestone tasks, missing predecessors/successors, tasks with constrained dates, and tasks with Slack thresholds or unusual durations.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},239366,1791724226,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":101},962085570644,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMS) -CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS  \nVersion 6-01  \nDocument Control Number 1021-00000 2011-04-29  \nCandidate Draft  \nConsortium for Ocean Leadership  \n1201 New York Ave NW, 4th Floor, Washington DC 20005 [www.OceanLeadership.org](www.OceanLeadership.org)  \nin Cooperation with  \nUniversity of California, San Diego University of Washington  \nWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution Oregon State University  \nScripps Institution of Oceanography Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey  \nDocument Control Sheet  \n\n| Version | Date | Description | Originator |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1-01 | Oct 10, 2008 | Draft | M.Kleinow |\n| 1-02 | Oct 15, 2008 | Draft | L.A. Davis |\n| 1-21 | Oct 21,2008 | Draft | L.A. Davis |\n| 3-01 | Oct 22,2008 | Draft | L.A. Davis |\n| 3-02 | Oct 22, 2008 | Format and Edit | A. Ferlaino |\n| 3-03 | Oct 22, 2008 | Addition of run information | M. Kleinow, L. Davis |\n| 3-04 | Oct 23, 2008 | Format and review | A. Ferlaino |\n| 3-05 | Oct 23, 2008 | Addition of data & information | M. Kleinow, L. Davis |\n| 3-06 | Oct 24, 2008 | Additional information and format | M. Kleinow, L. Davis |\n| 3-07 | Oct 24, 2008 | Editing, information and formatting | A. Ferlaino, P. Yeung |\n| 3-08 | Oct 26, 2008 | Review and edit | A. Ferlaino |\n| 3-09 | Nov 03, 2008 | Second run of Steelray, additional information and format | M. Kleinow, L. Davis |\n| 3-10 | Nov 03, 2008 | Review and edit. | A. Ferlaino |\n| 4-03 | Feb 24, 2009 | Complete update to reflect the Variant Design F24 IMS. | M. Kleinow, A. Ferlaino |\n| 5-00 | Jun 16, 2010 | Update for PY1 Review | A. Anderson |\n| 6-00 | Apr 29, 2011 | Update for PY2 Review | M. Swezey |\n| 6-01 | Apr 29, 2011 | Formatting, edits. | A. Ferlaino, S. Banahan |\n\nTable of Contents:  \nDocument Control Sheet ................................................................................................................ i  \n1 Schedule Analysis .................................................................................................................... 1  \n1.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 1  \n1.2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 1  \n1.3 Scope ............................................................................................................................... 1  \n1.4 Review Process ............................................................................................................... 1  \n1.4.1 Schedule Quality Review............................................................................................. 1  \n1.4.2 Steelray Analyzer Review............................................................................................ 1  \n1.4.3 Critical Path ................................................................................................................. 1  \n2 Schedule Quality Review Findings........................................................................................... 2  \n2.1 Review Methodology ....................................................................................................... 2  \n2.2 4 Point IMS Quality Review ............................................................................................. 2  \n3 Steelray Analyzer® Report ....................................................................................................... 3  \n3.1 General – Steelray Analyzer review methodology .......................................................... 3  \n3.2 OOI Steelray Analyzer Criteria ........................................................................................ 3  \n3.3 CI Steelray Analyzer Report ............................................................................................ 6  \n3.4 CI Steelray Analyzer Report Discussion-Findings-Resolution ........................................ 7 ","cbCaioEcKA4yCDwA","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaioEcKA4yCDwA","pdf",669632,25,"English","# Schedule Analysis\n## Overview\n## Purpose\n## Scope\n## Review Process\n### Schedule Quality Review\n### Steelray Analyzer Review\n### Critical Path\n# Schedule Quality Review Findings\n## Review Methodology\n## 4 Point IMS Quality Review\n# Steelray Analyzer Report\n## General – Steelray Analyzer review methodology\n## OOI Steelray Analyzer Criteria\n## CI Steelray Analyzer Report\n## CI Steelray Analyzer Report Discussion-Findings-Resolution\n## RSN Steelray Analyzer Report\n## RSN Steelray Analyzer Report Discussion-Findings-Resolution","[{\"question\":\"What is the document’s main purpose?\",\"answer\":\"To analyze the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) using critical path analysis and structured schedule quality review, then present Steelray Analyzer findings and resolutions.\"},{\"question\":\"What review methodologies are included?\",\"answer\":\"The document includes a schedule quality review and a Steelray Analyzer review, as well as a 4-point IMS quality review approach.\"},{\"question\":\"Which types of schedule issues does the Steelray Analyzer report focus on?\",\"answer\":\"It evaluates topics such as baseline schedule integration errors, effort and milestone tasks, missing predecessors/successors, tasks with constrained dates, and tasks with Slack thresholds or unusual durations.\"}]","INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE (IMS) - Critical Path Analysis - Version 6-01 - Candidate Draft | PDF",1789147686]