[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-173151-105":53,"doc-detail-173151-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","indicator-handout-general-monitoring-and-evaluation-workshop","Indicator Handout - General - Monitoring and Evaluation Workshop","","A draft indicator handout for a Monitoring and Evaluation workshop on population, health and nutrition programs, presenting an example indicator matrix for an HIV/AIDS development framework. It links overall goals and development objectives to five priority areas: prevention and advocacy, treatment and continuum of care, mitigation of social and economic impact, monitoring/evaluation/research, and management and coordination. For each priority area, specific outputs are mapped to actionable indicator targets, with notes on revising indicators, aligning with financing frameworks, and ensuring demand-driven data supply.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/indicator-handout-general-monitoring-and-evaluation-workshop/173151/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/indicator-handout-general-monitoring-and-evaluation-workshop/173151.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Genevieve","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/octet-stream","2026-10-25","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":35},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"How are the outputs organized in the indicator matrix?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"Outputs are grouped under five priority areas that correspond to development objectives, with outputs numbered (e.g., 1.1–1.4, 2.1–2.2, 3.1–3.3, 4.1–4.2, 5.1–5.3).","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What does Output 1.1 focus on?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Output 1.1 targets improved awareness and positive behaviour change among priority groups.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What guidance is given for revising and improving the indicators?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The handout notes that the final list of output indicators should reflect priority activities and be revised to incorporate recent developments, including updating care and support indicators and aligning indicators with the NAC Financing Framework.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},173151,1791166521,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":35,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":141},1374391974585,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Handout\nfor\nSession on Indicators\nWorkshop: Monitoring and Evaluation of Population, Health and Nutrition Programs\nExample of (Draft) Indicator Matrix\nGoal & Development Objectives.\nGOAL: Prevent the spread of HIV epidemic & minimize its impact by 2009\nDevelopment Objective 1: Reduction of HIV prevalence\nDevelopment Objective 2: Improved health and quality of life of people infected & affected by HIV/AIDS\nDevelopment Objective 3: Strengthened capacity of National AIDS Committee and other stakeholders to respond to the HIV/AIDS epidemic at all levels through a) improved research, monitoring, and evaluation, and b) improved management & coordination.\n\u000fPriority Area 1: Prevention & Advocacy (relating to Development Objective 1)\nOutput 1.1: Improved awareness & positive behaviour change attained among priority groups\n\u000fOutput 1.2: Improved supply, storage, and use of safe blood and blood products.\n\u000fOutput 1.3: Improved treatment and control of STDs.\n\u000fOutput 1.4: Prevent mother to child transmission of HIV.\n\u000fPriority Area 2: Treatment, Continuum of Care & Support (relating to Development Objective 2)\nOutput 2.1: Appropriate policies and legislation formulated and enforced to guarantee the legal rights of the infected and affected to adequate healthcare and social support.\n\u000fOutput 2.2 Increased access to improved comprehensive & integrated treatment, care, & support services for the infected/affected.\nNote: final list of output indicators should reflect the priority activities for this output.  These indicators should be revised to incorporate recent developments in care and support indicators as they become available (e.g. USAID working group pretest and other work).\n\u000fPriority Area 3: Mitigation of Social and Economic Impact (relating to Development Objective 3)\nOutput 3.1: Improved capacity within NAC & stakeholders to design, prepare, and manage HIV/AIDS programmes.\nNote: other appropriate indicators should be developed as this priority area is further defined.  Another suggestion here is to use some sort of “shopping basket” approach to get a sense of capacity development among stakeholders.\n\u000fOutput 3.2: Increased level of resources mobilized to address the HIV/AIDS epidemic\nNote:  Indicators here should be consistent with NAC Financing Framework.  \u000fOutput 3.3: Policies and legislation in place to protect the rights of orphans, widows, and widowers\n\u000fPriority Area 4: Monitoring, Evaluation, & Research (Relating to Development Objective 3)\nOutput 4.1: Effective M&E systems in place for the collection, analysis, dissemination, and use of information concerning the success of HIV/AIDS programmes.\nNote:  Comment made that this is “demand driven”.  Can/should indicators be included to monitor the establishment of processes that encourage stakeholders to supply data to NAC?\u000f\nOutput 4.2: Comprehensive HIV/AIDS research programme implemented to generate increased knowledge to improve quality of prevention and care activities\n\u000fPriority Area 5: Management and Coordination (Relating to Development Objective 3)\nOutput 5.1: Strengthen institutional capacity of NAC and its entities to coordinate and manage HIV/AIDS activities.\n\u000fOutput 5.2: Effective coordination of resource mobilization at all levels\n\u000fOutput 5.3: Increased collaboration and networking between NAC system and stakeholders at all levels\nExamples of Indicator Reference Sheets\n\u000f","cbCaied6Gc3o3D4F","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaied6Gc3o3D4F","doc",247808,26,"English","# Goal & development objectives\n## Priority Area 1: Prevention & advocacy\n## Priority Area 2: Treatment, continuum of care & support\n## Priority Area 3: Mitigation of social and economic impact\n## Priority Area 4: Monitoring, evaluation & research\n## Priority Area 5: Management and coordination","[{\"question\":\"How are the outputs organized in the indicator matrix?\",\"answer\":\"Outputs are grouped under five priority areas that correspond to development objectives, with outputs numbered (e.g., 1.1–1.4, 2.1–2.2, 3.1–3.3, 4.1–4.2, 5.1–5.3).\"},{\"question\":\"What does Output 1.1 focus on?\",\"answer\":\"Output 1.1 targets improved awareness and positive behaviour change among priority groups.\"},{\"question\":\"What guidance is given for revising and improving the indicators?\",\"answer\":\"The handout notes that the final list of output indicators should reflect priority activities and be revised to incorporate recent developments, including updating care and support indicators and aligning indicators with the NAC Financing Framework.\"}]","Indicator Handout - General - Monitoring and Evaluation Workshop | DOC",1788300501,9]