[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-166209-en":3,"doc-seo-166209-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":92},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":11,"category_id":12,"category_name":13,"doc_title":14,"doc_description":15,"doc_content":16,"file_id":17,"file_url":18,"file_type":19,"file_size":20,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":11,"is_downloadable":11,"audit_status":11,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":15,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},166209,13056703019662,"Evangeline","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/be000253a8e92610077?_k=1778726343310543188",1,11,"Presentations","INCEPTION REPORT - CONTENTS","Inception report template for an internal evaluation, structured to guide a desk review, define the evaluation methodology, and document sampling, tools, and work planning. It includes sections for intervention logic, desk review summary under evaluation criteria, proposed changes aligned with the evaluation ToR, and a detailed evaluation matrix. Annexes provide desk review document lists, stakeholder updates, evaluation team work plan, and evaluation instruments including interview guides, online surveys, focus groups, and workshop/event observations, while noting confidentiality and guidance removal of placeholders.","DRAFT\nINCEPTION REPORT\n(INTERNAL DOCUMENT)\nType of Evaluation (E.G. FINAL IN-DEPTh EVALUATION)\nOF\nName of the Project/ProgramME\nProject/PROGRAMME number\nNote: This is an internal document and to be shared exclusively with IES, except instructed otherwise by IES.\nVienna, YEAR\nINSTRUCTIONS\nBEIGE TEXT BOXES LIKE THIS provide instructions. Please delete them before submitting the report (just click on the border of the text box and delete it).\nText areas HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW are placeholders. You will need to replace them with actual data and remove the highlighting.\nPlease contact IES directly if more guidance is needed. Email: \u0013 HYPERLINK \"mailto:ies@unodc.org\" \u0014ies@unodc.org\u0015\nPlease also consult templates and guidelines on the IES website:  \u0013 HYPERLINK \"https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/evaluation/guidelines-and-templates.html\" \u0014https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/evaluation/guidelines-and-templates.html\u0015\nCONTENTS\n\u0013 TOC \\o \"1-2\" \\u \u0014CONTENTS\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418738 \\h \u00142\u0015\nI. Desk Review Summary\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418739 \\h \u00143\u0015\nDesk review summary, including areas for further exploration during data collection\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418740 \\h \u00143\u0015\nSummary of main changes proposed\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418741 \\h \u00144\u0015\nII. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY,  APPROACH AND SAMPLING\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418742 \\h \u00146\u0015\nMethodological Approach\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418743 \\h \u00146\u0015\nStakeholder Analysis\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418744 \\h \u00146\u0015\ndata collection tools, sampling, analysis and triangulation\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418745 \\h \u00147\u0015\nField missions\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418746 \\h \u00147\u0015\nLimitations\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418747 \\h \u00148\u0015\nIII. EVALUATION MATRIX\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418748 \\h \u00149\u0015\nANNEX I. Desk Review List\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418749 \\h \u001411\u0015\nUNODC DOCUMENTS\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418750 \\h \u001411\u0015\nEXTERNAL DOCUMENTS\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418751 \\h \u001411\u0015\nADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS REQUESTED\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418752 \\h \u001411\u0015\nANNEX II. UPDATED LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418753 \\h \u001413\u0015\nLIST OF Stakeholders\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418754 \\h \u001413\u0015\nANNEX III. WORK PLAN EVALUATION TEAM\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418755 \\h \u001416\u0015\nANNEX IV. EVALUATION TOOLS\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418756 \\h \u001417\u0015\nSemi-structured interview guides by stakeholder group\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418757 \\h \u001417\u0015\nOnline survey/questionnaire\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418758 \\h \u001418\u0015\nFocus group guides and arrangements\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418759 \\h \u001418\u0015\nOverview observation of workshops/events\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc138418760 \\h \u001419\u0015\n\u0015\nI. Desk Review Summary\nIntervention logic of the project/programme\nBuilding on the information from the full evaluation ToR:\n1. Provide additional information and analyses of the key features of the evaluation subject. This should include strategic objectives, outcomes, outputs, activities, budget, modalities of engagement, donor, beneficiaries, partners, etc.\n2. Explain the gender, equity and wider inclusion dimensions of the subject evaluated, including relating to disability.\nPlease do not exceed 1 pages.\nWRITE YOUR TEXT ON TOP OF THIS IN ORDER TO CREATE THE CORRECT FORMAT AND STYLE\nDesk review summary, including areas for further exploration during data collection\nBased on the desk review summary:\n1. Please add here the key takings for each evaluation criterion that should be taken into consideration for further triangulation in the context of the evaluation questions, as stated in the evaluation ToR.\n2. Kindly remove headings of evaluation criteria that are not covered by this evaluation, if any.\nPlease do not exceed 3 pages.\nWRITE YOUR TEXT ON TOP OF THIS IN ORDER TO CREATE THE CORRECT FORMAT AND STYLE\nRELEVANCE\nEFFICIENCY\nCOHERENCE\nEFFECTIVENESS\nIMPACT\nSUSTAINABILITY\nHUMAN RIGHTS, GENDER EQUALITY, DISABILITY INCLUSION AND LEAVING NO ONE BEHIND\nSummary of main changes proposed\nBased on the desk review summary:\n1. Please describe the main changes proposed in relation with the evaluation ToR - e.g. to the evaluation scope, questions (including revision or proposed deletion of questions), methodology, data collection, work plan etc.\n2. In case there are any proposed changes ","cbCair29IVpEeREg","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCair29IVpEeREg","docx",381173,20,"English","en",105,"# I. Desk Review Summary\n## Desk review summary, including areas for further exploration during data collection\n## Summary of main changes proposed\n# II. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY, APPROACH AND SAMPLING\n## Methodological Approach\n## Stakeholder Analysis\n## data collection tools, sampling, analysis and triangulation\n## Field missions\n## Limitations\n# III. EVALUATION MATRIX\n## ANNEX I. Desk Review List\n## ANNEX II. UPDATED LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS\n## ANNEX III. WORK PLAN EVALUATION TEAM\n## ANNEX IV. EVALUATION TOOLS","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of this inception report template?\",\"answer\":\"It structures an internal evaluation inception phase by organizing the desk review summary, methodological approach, sampling and tools, and the evaluation matrix, supported by annexes for documents, stakeholders, team work plan, and instruments.\"},{\"question\":\"Which sections are included for the desk review and proposed changes?\",\"answer\":\"It provides a desk review summary (including areas for further exploration) and a section summarizing main changes proposed in relation to the evaluation ToR, including explanations for any revised or deleted evaluation questions.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the methodology section require regarding data collection and credibility?\",\"answer\":\"It requires describing the overall conceptual and methodological approach, detailing how stakeholder perspectives are included, specifying a mixed methods design and triangulation, safeguarding independence and impartiality, and ensuring compliance with human rights, gender equality, and disability inclusion requirements.\"}]","INCEPTION REPORT - CONTENTS | DOCX",1788186589,7,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":14,"keywords":34,"description":15,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":87,"head_meta":89,"extra_data":91,"updated_unix":28},"inception-report-contents","",{"@graph":36,"@context":86},[37,54,69],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,51],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":52,"name":14,"@type":43,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/inception-report-contents/166209/",4,{"url":52,"name":14,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":14,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":23,"description":15,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":63,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":64,"interactionStatistic":65},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":41,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-01","2026-08-31",true,{"@type":66,"interactionType":67,"userInteractionCount":11},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":68},"ViewAction",{"@type":70,"mainEntity":71},"FAQPage",[72,78,82],{"name":73,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":75},"What is the purpose of this inception report template?","Question",{"text":76,"@type":77},"It structures an internal evaluation inception phase by organizing the desk review summary, methodological approach, sampling and tools, and the evaluation matrix, supported by annexes for documents, stakeholders, team work plan, and instruments.","Answer",{"name":79,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":80},"Which sections are included for the desk review and proposed changes?",{"text":81,"@type":77},"It provides a desk review summary (including areas for further exploration) and a section summarizing main changes proposed in relation to the evaluation ToR, including explanations for any revised or deleted evaluation questions.",{"name":83,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":84},"What does the methodology section require regarding data collection and credibility?",{"text":85,"@type":77},"It requires describing the overall conceptual and methodological approach, detailing how stakeholder perspectives are included, specifying a mixed methods design and triangulation, safeguarding independence and impartiality, and ensuring compliance with human rights, gender equality, and disability inclusion requirements.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":88,"og:title":14,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":15},"article",{"robots":90,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":93},[94,97,102,107,112,117,122,127,132],{"id":12,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":13,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},90,"presentations",{"id":98,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":103,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":108,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":113,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":118,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":120,"slug":121},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":123,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":125,"slug":126},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":128,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":130,"slug":131},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":133,"doc_module":11,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":134,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":135},158,"General","general-158"]