[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-281025-105":53,"doc-detail-281025-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","hb-4056-legislative-report-september-2024","HB 4056 - Legislative Report - September 2024","","Legislative Report covering Oregon House Bill 4056 and its response to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling Tyler v. Hennepin County regarding property tax foreclosure surplus funds. It summarizes the unanimous Takings Clause analysis that limits government retention of property beyond what is owed. The report explains the Department of Revenue’s workgroup process with county and stakeholder participation, documents key meeting discussion points, and compiles recommendations submitted for legislative consideration by September 15, 2024.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/hb-4056-legislative-report-september-2024/281025/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/hb-4056-legislative-report-september-2024/281025.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Nguyễn Văn Học","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-16",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What legal issue prompted Oregon House Bill 4056?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"House Bill 4056 responds to Tyler v. Hennepin County, where the U.S. Supreme Court held that government entities cannot take more property than what is owed to satisfy the debt, violating the Takings Clause.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"What did House Bill 4056 require the Department of Revenue to do?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"It required the Department of Revenue to coordinate with county tax officers and interested parties to develop a process for determining surplus and distributing proceeds from property lien foreclosures, then report recommendations to the legislature by September 15, 2024.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How was the workgroup process organized in 2024?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"The department invited representatives from all counties, selected legislators and staff, and other stakeholders. Six meetings were held between April and August 2024, and this report summarizes key discussion points and action items from each meeting.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},281025,1790212125,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":142},1374402739827,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/14000c97e7351f1a627?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1787885694763230660","LEGISLATIVE REPORT  \nHOUSE BILL 4056  \nSeptember 2024  \nContact us for ADA accommodations or assistance in other languages . [www. oregon.gov/dor](www. oregon.gov/dor)  \n503-378-4988 or 800-356-4222 [questions.dor@oregon.gov](questions.dor@oregon.gov)  \nComuníquese con nosotros para solicitar adaptaciones de la ADA (Ley sobre Estadounidenses con Discapacidades) o asistencia en otros idiomas. [www. oregon.gov/dor](www. oregon.gov/dor)  \n503-378-4988 o 800-356-4222 [preguntas.dor@oregon.gov](preguntas.dor@oregon.gov)  \nLEGISLATIVE REPORT - HOUS E BILL 4 0 5 6 - 2  \nCONTENTS  \nContents 3  \nOverview 4  \nSummary of Workgroup Suggestions 5  \nOverview of the Oregon Tax Foreclosure Process 8  \nApril 17, 2024 Meeting 9  \nMay 1, 2024 Meeting 10  \nMay 22, 2024 Meeting 14  \nJune 26, 2024 Meeting 17  \nJuly 17, 2024 Meeting 22  \nAugust 14, 2024 Meeting 24  \nMeeting Documents 28  \nApril 17, 2024 Meeting Documents 29  \nMay 1, 2024 Meeting Documents 52  \nMay 22, 2024 Meeting Documents 57  \nJune 26, 2024 Meeting Documents 241  \nJuly 17, 2024 Meeting Documents 271  \nAugust 14, 2024 Meeting Documents 295  \nPost Meeting Documents 306  \nHB 4056 REPORT  \nOverview  \nIn 2023 the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Tyler vs. Hennepin County, a case related to property tax foreclosure sales and resulting surplus funds in excess of taxes owed to the county. The plaintiff in the case owed approximately $15,000 in property taxes, interest, and penalties on a condominium they owned in Minneapolis. To collect the amounts owed, Hennepin County foreclosed on the condominium and sold it for $40,000 . This resulted in a surplus amount, after all taxes and other fees were paid, of approximately $25,000 . Under Minnesota law, Hennepin County retained these surplus funds and did not return them to the property owner. The property owner filed a case in district court asserting that this was a violation of their rights. After losing in district and Circuit courts, the case was eventually heard in the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court unanimously voted in favor of the plaintiff, finding that a government entity could not take more property than what is owed to satisfy the debt, and that this constituted a violation of the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s 5th Amendment.  \nHouse Bill 4056 was approved during Oregon’s 2024 legislative session in response to Tyler vs. Hennepin. This bill required the Department of Revenue to coordinate with county tax officers and interested parties to create a process for determining surplus and distribution of proceeds of property lien foreclosures, and to report recommendations from the interested parties to the legislature by September 15, 2024.  \nIn response to the bill, the department invited representatives from all counties (including tax assessors, collectors, treasurers, and counsel); select legislators and staff; and other interested parties and groups to participate in aworkgroup to identify a process to address the issues defined in the bill. The list of invitees was developed based on the oral and written testimony submitted to the record on HB 4056, and included over 200 individuals. Six meetings were held between April and August 2024. This report provides an overview of the key discussion points and action items of each meeting.  \nThis report includes written summaries of the discussions held during each of the workgroup meetings. We encourage listening to the recordings of each meeting for the full discussion. Resources related to HB 4056 and workgroup agendas, meeting materials, and video recordings of each meeting are posted on a department website at [https://www.oregon.gov/dor/programs/property/Pages/property_tax-foreclosure_sales.aspx](https://www.oregon.gov/dor/programs/property/Pages/property_tax-foreclosure_sales.aspx).  \nMeeting materials are also included as exhibits at the end of this report.  \nLEGI SLATI VE REPORT - HOUS E BILL 4 0 5 6 - 4  \nSummary of Workgroup Suggestions  ","cbCaiuyiwzWTJPRN","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuyiwzWTJPRN","pdf",20295925,329,"English","# Overview\n## Summary of Workgroup Suggestions\n## Overview of the Oregon Tax Foreclosure Process\n## April 17, 2024 Meeting\n## May 1, 2024 Meeting\n## May 22, 2024 Meeting\n## June 26, 2024 Meeting\n## July 17, 2024 Meeting\n## August 14, 2024 Meeting\n## Meeting Documents\n## Post Meeting Documents","[{\"question\":\"What legal issue prompted Oregon House Bill 4056?\",\"answer\":\"House Bill 4056 responds to Tyler v. Hennepin County, where the U.S. Supreme Court held that government entities cannot take more property than what is owed to satisfy the debt, violating the Takings Clause.\"},{\"question\":\"What did House Bill 4056 require the Department of Revenue to do?\",\"answer\":\"It required the Department of Revenue to coordinate with county tax officers and interested parties to develop a process for determining surplus and distributing proceeds from property lien foreclosures, then report recommendations to the legislature by September 15, 2024.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the workgroup process organized in 2024?\",\"answer\":\"The department invited representatives from all counties, selected legislators and staff, and other stakeholders. Six meetings were held between April and August 2024, and this report summarizes key discussion points and action items from each meeting.\"}]","HB 4056 - Legislative Report - September 2024 | PDF",1789563619,115]