[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-280999-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":81,"doc-detail-280999-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","guidelines-on-termination-of-contracts","Guidelines on Termination of Contracts","","Guidelines on termination of procurement contracts establish policy for fair and effective handling of whole or partial contract termination for goods, infrastructure projects, and consulting services. The text defines key anti-corruption and procurement misconduct concepts, including coercive, collusive, corrupt, and fraudulent practices, and clarifies roles such as the Head of the Procuring Entity and implementing unit. It details grounds for termination, including termination for default, covering failures to deliver, negative slippage criteria, abandonment, noncompliance, and subcontracting without approval.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/","Letters",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/guidelines-on-termination-of-contracts/280999/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/guidelines-on-termination-of-contracts/280999.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Jake","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-16",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",10,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of these termination guidelines?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"They promote fairness in terminating procurement contracts and set contract conditions and measures so government can protect its interests during whole or partial termination.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What is meant by “coercive practice” in the guidelines?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It refers to harming or threatening to harm persons or their property, directly or indirectly, to influence participation in a procurement process or affect contract execution.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"Under what circumstances can a contract be terminated for default?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The Procuring Entity terminates for default when the supplier/contractor/consultant fails to deliver or perform within contractual timelines or fails other obligations, subject to specified criteria for force majeure, project slippage, and misconduct such as abandonment or unauthorized subcontracting.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},280999,1790132539,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,89,94,99,104,109,114,118,123],{"id":85,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":86,"show_sort_weight":87,"slug":88},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":90,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":91,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":95,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":100,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":105,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":110,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":115,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},18,30,"letters",{"id":119,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":124,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":126},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":128},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":129,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":22,"category_id":115,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":141,"read_time":26},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","GUIDELINES ON TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS  \nI. PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND APPLICATION  \nThese guidelines aim to promote fairness in the termination of procurement contractsand to prescribe contract conditions and measures to enable government to protect its interests. For this purpose, policies and procedures relating to the whole or partial termination of government procurement contracts of goods, infrastructure projects, and consulting services are herein established.  \nII. DEFINITION OF TERMS  \n1. Coercive Practice means harming or threatening to harm, directly or indirectly, persons or their property to influence their participation in a procurement process, or affect the execution of a contract.  \n2. Collusive Practice means a scheme or arrangement including practice among bidders (prior to or after bid submission) designed to establish bid prices at artificial noncompetitive levels to prevent free and open competition.  \n3. Corrupt Practice means the offering, giving, receiving or soliciting of anything of value to influence the action of a public official in the selection process or in contract execution. It also means entering, on behalf of the Government, into any contract or transaction manifestly and grossly disadvantageous to the same, whether or not the public officer profits or will profit thereby; and similar acts as provided in Republic Act 3019.  \n4. Fraudulent Practice means a misrepresentation of facts in order to influence aselection process or the execution of a contract to the detriment of the Procuring Entity.  \n5. Head of the Procuring Entity refers to: (i) the head of the agency or his duly authorized official, for national government agencies; (ii) the governing board or its duly authorized official, for government-owned and/or controlled corporations; or (iii) the local chief executive, for local government units. Provided, that in a department, office or agency where the procurement is decentralized, the Head of each decentralized unit shall be considered as the Head of the Procuring Entity subject to the limitations and authority delegated by the head of the department, office or agency.  \n6. Implementing Unit refers to the unit or office having direct supervision or administration over the implementation of the contract such as the Project Management Office or the End-User Unit.  \n7. Termination in Part means the termination of a part but not all, of the work that has not been completed and accepted under a contract.  \n8. Termination in Whole means the termination of all of the work that has not been completed and accepted under a contract.  \n9. Show Cause refers to a notice which the Procuring Entity is required to issue prior to terminating a contract. The purpose of a show cause notice is to enable the contractor to present its position why the contract should not be terminated.  \n10. Verified Report refers to the report submitted by the Implementing Unit to the Head of the Procuring Entity setting forth its findings as to the existence of grounds or causes for termination and explicitly stating its recommendation for the issuance of a Notice to Terminate.  \nIII. GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS  \nA. Termination for Default  \n1.  In contracts for Goods:  \nThe Procuring Entity shall terminate a contract for default when any of the following conditions attend its implementation:  \na) Outside offorce majeure, the Supplier fails to deliver or perform any or all of the Goods within the period(s) specified in the contract, or within any extension thereof granted by the Procuring Entity pursuant to a request made by the Supplier prior to the delay, and such failure amounts to at least ten percent (10%) of the contact price;  \nb) As a result of force majeure, the Supplier is unable to deliver or perform any or all of the Goods, amounting to at least ten percent (10%) of the contract price, for a period of not less than sixty (60) calendar days after receipt of the notice from the Procuring Entity stating tha","cbCainlrgfVg6QMA","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainlrgfVg6QMA","pdf",44849,6,"English","# I. Purpose, Scope, and Application\n# II. Definition of Terms\n# III. Grounds for Termination of Contracts\n## A. Termination for Default","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of these termination guidelines?\",\"answer\":\"They promote fairness in terminating procurement contracts and set contract conditions and measures so government can protect its interests during whole or partial termination.\"},{\"question\":\"What is meant by “coercive practice” in the guidelines?\",\"answer\":\"It refers to harming or threatening to harm persons or their property, directly or indirectly, to influence participation in a procurement process or affect contract execution.\"},{\"question\":\"Under what circumstances can a contract be terminated for default?\",\"answer\":\"The Procuring Entity terminates for default when the supplier/contractor/consultant fails to deliver or perform within contractual timelines or fails other obligations, subject to specified criteria for force majeure, project slippage, and misconduct such as abandonment or unauthorized subcontracting.\"}]","Guidelines on Termination of Contracts | PDF",1789563494]