[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-242989-105":53,"doc-detail-242989-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","grants-101-essentials-of-competitive-proposals-part-i-agenda","Grants 101 - Essentials of Competitive Proposals - Part I - Agenda","","Grants 101: Essentials of Competitive Proposals (Prepared for Temple University) provides guidance for competitive grantseeking, focusing on how to understand the funding landscape and prepare stronger submissions. It introduces the context for solicitations through funding trends and the role of federal, state, and other funders, framing funding as both an investment and an obligation. The material also helps teams position their work by linking it to field knowledge via literature review, identifying gaps, assessing duplication, and evaluating competitiveness through publication record, collaborations, and preliminary data.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/grants-101-essentials-of-competitive-proposals-part-i-agenda/242989/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/grants-101-essentials-of-competitive-proposals-part-i-agenda/242989.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Mia  ","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What does the session focus on in Part I of Grants 101?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"Part I covers the agenda items for competitive grantseeking: understanding the funding landscape, setting the stage, and developing compelling proposals.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"How can grantseekers determine how their work fits within the field?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"Grantseekers are instructed to connect their work to related national and international efforts and to use a literature review to guide the process, including identifying gaps and avoiding duplication.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Which factors are used to assess a team’s competitiveness for a grant?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"Competitiveness is assessed using the publication record, appointment in the department, collaboration history, experience with trainees, and preliminary studies/data status.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},242989,1789198056,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":22,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":126,"read_time":140},687207024478,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Grants 101: Essentials of Competitive Proposals  \nPrepared for Temple University  \n[www . ha nov er res ea rc h . com](www . ha nov er res ea rc h . com)  \nBiography  \nSarah Ott, Grants Consultant, Hanover Research  \n􀂃 Joined Hanover as a Grants Consultant in April 2013  \n􀂃 Began grant writing career at West Virginia University Health Sciences Center  \n􀂃 Continued career at University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio  \n􀂃 Extensive experience and success with basic and clinical science grant proposals  \n􀂃 Has helped clients obtain more than $30 million in funding from government agencies and private foundations including NIH, PCORI, HRSA, CDC, the Department of Education, other federal agencies, and private funders  \n2  \nGRANTS 101: ESSENTIALS OF COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS PART I  \n3  \nPart I: Agenda  \nKnow the Funding Landscape  \nSet the Stage for Competitive Grantseeking  \nDeveloping Compelling Proposals  \nKNOW THE FUNDING LANDSCAPE  \n5  \nContext for Solicitations  \n􀂃 Funding trends  \n􀂃 President’s budget request (OMB website)  \n􀂃 Funding as an investment  \n􀂃 Funding as an obligation  \nTypes of Funders  \n􀂃 Federal agencies  \n􀂃 State and local government agencies  \n􀂃 National, regional, local, family, community, and corporate foundations  \n􀂃 Professional or industry associations  \n􀂃 Businesses and companies  \n􀂃 Others  \nSET THE STAGE FOR COMPETITIVE  \nGRANTSEEKING  \n8  \nKnow Your Field  \n􀂃 How does your work relate to other work in the field?  \n– Nationally, internationally  \n– Literature Review  \n– The answer to this question should guide the grantseeking process  \n􀂃 Ask yourself:  \n– What gap in knowledge or services will this work fill?  \n– Does this work build on previous work? Which work?  \n– Does this work solve a fundamental challenge facing the field?  \n– Does this work duplicate other work?  \n– How does this work relate to other work currently in process?  \n– How will this work contribute to the field in the short and long term?  \n– Is this work a priority for the field?  \n9  \nAssess Your Competitiveness  \n􀂃 Publication Record  \n􀂃 Appointment in department  \n􀂃 Established collaborations > new collaborations > no collaboration  \n􀂃 Experience with trainees  \n􀂃 Preliminary Studies/data  \n– Published > Unpublished > In progress > None  \n10","cbCaiioe4LM9rpFi","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiioe4LM9rpFi","pdf",2835348,"English","# Part I: Agenda\n## Know the Funding Landscape\n## Set the Stage for Competitive Grantseeking\n## Developing Compelling Proposals\n## Context for Solicitations\n## Types of Funders\n## Know Your Field\n## Assess Your Competitiveness","[{\"question\":\"What does the session focus on in Part I of Grants 101?\",\"answer\":\"Part I covers the agenda items for competitive grantseeking: understanding the funding landscape, setting the stage, and developing compelling proposals.\"},{\"question\":\"How can grantseekers determine how their work fits within the field?\",\"answer\":\"Grantseekers are instructed to connect their work to related national and international efforts and to use a literature review to guide the process, including identifying gaps and avoiding duplication.\"},{\"question\":\"Which factors are used to assess a team’s competitiveness for a grant?\",\"answer\":\"Competitiveness is assessed using the publication record, appointment in the department, collaboration history, experience with trainees, and preliminary studies/data status.\"}]","Grants 101 - Essentials of Competitive Proposals - Part I - Agenda | PDF",25]