[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-171179-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":81,"doc-detail-171179-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","global-report-kmgbf-peer-review-annotated-outline-background","global-report-kmgbf-peer-review-annotated-outline - Background","","Background note describing the preparation process for the global report on collective progress in implementing the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. It explains how the Conference of the Parties established an Ad Hoc Scientific and Technical Advisory Group, the peer-review timeline, and how decision 16/32’s structural elements and information sources shaped the annotated outline. It also outlines report scope, balancing Convention objectives, addressing implementation challenges, and planning peer-review outputs and reflections for the relevant subsidiary bodies.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/","Presentations",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/global-report-kmgbf-peer-review-annotated-outline-background/171179/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/global-report-kmgbf-peer-review-annotated-outline-background/171179.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"River Wang","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-20","2026-09-01",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",12,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of the annotated outline background note?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It provides background on preparing the global report on collective progress under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and explains how the annotated outline is structured for peer review.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How was the annotated outline structured for the global report?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It follows the structural elements and information sources identified by the Conference of the Parties in decision 16/32, using them to organize the annotated outline.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What happens after the peer review of the annotated outline?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Peer review comments will be made publicly available through the clearing house mechanism, and the Advisory Group will publish reflections on the received views as part of its progress reporting to the Subsidiary Body.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},171179,1791699949,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,97,102,107,112,117,122],{"id":85,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},11,90,"presentations",{"id":55,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":93,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":98,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":103,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":104,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":108,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":113,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":114,"show_sort_weight":115,"slug":116},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":118,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":120,"slug":121},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":123,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":125},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":127},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":128,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":22,"category_id":85,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":140,"read_time":30},1099514067438,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002539ee87300030?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780474512215547542","Draft : Unedited and Advanced Version for Peer-review\nGuidance from the Ad hoc scientific and technical advisory group for the preparation of the global report on collective progress in the implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework\nBackground (**These sections are background only and not for peer review. Peer review sections begin at the bottom of page 2**)\nBackground on the global report on collective progress in the implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework\nIn its decision 16/32, the Conference of the Parties decided to establish an Ad Hoc Scientific and Technical Advisory Group for the Preparation of the Global Report on Collective Progress in the Implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, with its terms of reference in Annex III to that same decision, to oversee and guide the production of the global report on collective progress towards the implementation of the Framework. It also noted an indicative timeline for the global review, in Annex IV of that decision.\nAlso in Annex IV of decision 16/32, the Conference of the Parties decided that an annotated outline of the global report would be made available for peer review and subsequent consideration by the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice at its twenty-seventh meeting. In the timeline for the global review, the Conference of the Parties also specified that the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, at its twenty-seventh meeting, will provide advice on scientific inputs to the global report, including on its annotated outline, and that the Subsidiary Body on Article 8(j) and Other Provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity Related to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities will provide advice on traditional knowledge inputs to the report.\nThe Conference of the Parties, in paragraph 17 of its decision 16/32, identified the structural elements of the global report, and in paragraph 18 of that same decision, it identified the sources of information the report should draw on. The Advisory Group has used these elements to structure the annotated outline presented in the addendum to this document.\nThe Conference of the Parties, in its decision 16/32, decided that the global report on collective progress in the implementation of the Framework should consider the three objectives of the Convention in a balanced manner. The global report will also include information on specific challenges in the implementation of the Framework, especially for developing country Parties, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States.\nThe experts serving on the Advisory Group were selected in April 2025. The progress that the advisory group has made towards producing the global report is presented in the addendum to this document. The addendum was prepared by the advisory group for peer review during the period prior to the twenty-seventh meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice and for its subsequent consideration by that Subsidiary Body. To meet the deadlines for documents prepared for the consideration of the Subsidiary Body, a revision of the addendum will not be presented to the Subsidiary Body following the peer review. However, the Advisory Group will prepare an information document, CBD/SBSTTA/27/INF/XX containing their reflections on the views received through the peer review.\nProgress in producing the global report on collective progress in the implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework\nProgress to date\nThe Ad Hoc Scientific and Technical Advisory Group for the Preparation of the Global Report on Collective Progress in the Implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework met online three times between its establishment and the preparation of this note. The annex to the present note contains a draft annotated outline for the ","cbCaipZJoOAhu3wv","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaipZJoOAhu3wv","docx",567343,8,"English","# Background on the global report on collective progress in the implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework\n## Establishment of the advisory group and peer review timeline\n## Structural elements, information sources, and report scope\n## Progress to date and peer-review process\n# Considerations related to national reports and other information sources","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the annotated outline background note?\",\"answer\":\"It provides background on preparing the global report on collective progress under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and explains how the annotated outline is structured for peer review.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the annotated outline structured for the global report?\",\"answer\":\"It follows the structural elements and information sources identified by the Conference of the Parties in decision 16/32, using them to organize the annotated outline.\"},{\"question\":\"What happens after the peer review of the annotated outline?\",\"answer\":\"Peer review comments will be made publicly available through the clearing house mechanism, and the Advisory Group will publish reflections on the received views as part of its progress reporting to the Subsidiary Body.\"}]","global-report-kmgbf-peer-review-annotated-outline - Background | DOCX",1788279918]