[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-252717-105":53,"doc-detail-252717-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","global-real-estate-sustainability-benchmark-example-portfolio-analysis-report","Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark - Example Portfolio Analysis - Report","","Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) example portfolio analysis report (2015) presents a portfolio and benchmark comparison using GRESB score and quadrant-model style breakdowns. It summarizes key selection and benchmark characteristics such as number of companies/funds, regions, property types, and GAV ranges, then evaluates portfolio performance versus benchmark and peer groups. The report details GRESB dimensions including Management & Policy, Social, Implementation & Measurement, and highlights contributions from stakeholder engagement, policy & disclosure, risks & opportunities, and monitoring/EMS, with weighted scores and benchmark averages.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":26,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/posters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/global-real-estate-sustainability-benchmark-example-portfolio-analysis-report/252717/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/global-real-estate-sustainability-benchmark-example-portfolio-analysis-report/252717.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Angel","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-07","2026-09-13",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",8,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What does the GRESB score section compare in this example portfolio analysis?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"It compares the portfolio’s overall results and sub-dimension results against benchmark averages and a peer-group context, including performance versus benchmark and peer group signals.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Which GRESB dimensions are covered in the portfolio summary?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The report includes dimensions such as Management & Policy and Social, alongside implementation and measurement-style areas reflected through weighted indicators.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What portfolio characteristics are listed under selection versus benchmark?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"It lists companies/funds counts, regions, property type groupings, GAV ranges, and the percentage of the portfolio not covered, separating portfolio selection characteristics from benchmark characteristics.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},252717,1790483837,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":25,"category_name":26,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":8,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":79},687207412472,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","G l o b a l R e a l E s t a t e S u s t a i n a b i l i t y B e n c h m a r k  \nExample Portfolio Analysis  \nGRESBAnalysys report 2015  \nDATE: September 17 2015 19:50 UTC  \n© 2015 GRESB BV  \nHighlights  \nSelection Characteristics  \nCompanies/Funds: 12  \nRegions: Selected Regions  \nProperty Types: Selected Property Types  \nGAV Range: $29 Million- $6.49 Billion  \nPercentage of portfolio not covered: 30.0  \nBenchmark Characteristics  \nCompanies/Funds: 58  \nRegions: Selected Regions  \nProperty Types: Selected Property Types  \nGAV Range: $107 Million- $13.1 Billion  \nGRESB Score  \nGRESB Quadrant Model  \n100  \nManagement & Policy  \n50  \n0  \nPortfolio Average  \n Portfolio  \n Benchmark Average  \n Benchmark  \n GRESB Average  \n Green Stars  \n GRESB Universe  \n0 50 100  \nImplementation & Measurement  \nGRESB Dimensions  \nManagement & Policy  \nGRESB Average 63 Benchmark Average 66  \nSocial   \nGRESB Average 58 Benchmark Average 59  \nPage 2 of 14 GRESB Analysys report 2015 for Example Portfolio Analysis —September 17 2015 19:50 UTC  \nPortfolio Overview  \nName  \nScore  \nMP  \nIM  \nGreen-  \nstar?  \nPerformance  \nvs. Benchmark  \nPerformance  \nvs. Peer Group  \nPeer Group  \nSelection Weighted Average  \n49  \n55  \n46  \n7/12  \nN/A  \nN/A  \nBenchmark Report Example  \n77  \n77  \n77  \nY  \nExample Country  \nExample Region  \nExample Fund  \n74  \n84  \n70  \nY  \nExample Country  \nExample Region  \n\n| Example Fund 65 66\u003Cbr>Example Fund\u003Cbr>Fund Manager 62 71 Example Fund\u003Cbr>Fund Manager 61 77 Example Fund\u003Cbr>Fund Manager 58 72 Example Fund\u003Cbr>Fund Manager 58 73 Example Fund\u003Cbr>Fund Manager 48 60 Example Fund\u003Cbr>Fund Manager 43 17 Example Fund\u003Cbr>Fund Manager 19 28\u003Cbr>Example Fund 16 22\u003Cbr>Fund Manager | 64 Y |  |  | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | 58 Y | | | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n|  | 55 Y |  |  | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n|  | 53 Y |  |  | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n|  | 52 Y |  |  | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n|  | 43 | | | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n|  | 54\u003Cbr>\u003Cbr>15\u003Cbr>\u003Cbr>|  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n|  |  |  |  | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n|  |  |  |  | Example Country\u003Cbr>Example Region |\n|  | 14 | | |  |\n\nExample Fund  \nFund Manager  \nHistorical Trend  \nOverall Score  \n100  \n50  \n0  \n5  \n10  \n3  \n2013 2014 2015  \nExample Country  \nExample Region  \n Portfolio  \n Benchmark Range  \n GRESB Range  \n Benchmark Average  GRESB Average  \nPage 3 of 14 GRESB Analysys report 2015 for Example Portfolio Analysis —September 17 2015 19:50 UTC  \nPortfolio Summary  \nStakeholder Engagement  \nBuilding Certifications  \nPolicy & Disclosure  \nRisks & Opportunities  \nAspect  \nWeight in GRESB Score  \nSelection  \nScore  \n Benchmark  \nBenchmark Comparison  \nManagement  \nweight: 8.7%  \n67  \nBENCHMARK  \n81  \nAVERAGE  \nFrequency  \nBenchmark Average  \n0 Score 100  \nGLOBAL 77  \nAVERAGE  \n\n| Policy & Disclosure\u003Cbr>weight: 10.1% | 62 | BENCHMARK\u003Cbr>69\u003Cbr>AVERAGE | 0\u003Cbr>Frequency |  | | | | Benchmark Average\u003Cbr>\u003Cbr>\u003Cbr>Score 100 | GLOBAL\u003Cbr>66\u003Cbr>AVERAGE |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Risks & Opportunities\u003Cbr>weight: 11.6% | 62 | BENCHMARK\u003Cbr>67\u003Cbr>AVERAGE | 0\u003Cbr>Frequency |  |  |  | | Benchmark Average\u003Cbr>\u003Cbr>Score 100 | GLOBAL\u003Cbr>67\u003Cbr>AVERAGE |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |\n\nMonitoring & EMS  \nweight: 9.4%  \n55  \nBENCHMARK  \n62  \nAVERAGE  \nFrequency  \nBenchmark Average  \n0 Score 100  \nGLOBAL 59  \nAVERAGE  \nPerformance Indicators  \nweight: 24.2%  \n32  \nBENCHMARK  \n35  \nAVERAGE  \nFrequency  \nBenchmark Average  \n0 Score 100  \nGLOBAL 39  \nAVERAGE  \nBuilding Certifications  \nweight: 10.8%  \n35  \nBENCHMARK  \n33  \nAVERAGE  \nFrequency  \n0 Score 100  \nGLOBAL 34  \nAVERAGE  \nStakeholder Engagement  \nweight: 25.3%  \n52  \nBENCHMARK  \n57  \nAVERAGE  \nFrequency  \n0 Score 100  \nGLOBAL 57  \nAVERAGE  \nNew Construction & Major  \nRenovations  \nweight: None  \n33  \nBENCHMARK  \n36  \nAVERAGE  \nFrequency  \nBenchmark Average  \n0 Score 100  \nGLOBAL 44","cbCaijrMJLj3RCA0","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijrMJLj3RCA0","pdf",1028236,"English","# Highlights\n## Selection Characteristics\n## Benchmark Characteristics\n# GRESB Score\n## GRESB Quadrant Model\n## Portfolio Overview\n## Portfolio Summary\n# Portfolio & Benchmark Characteristics","[{\"question\":\"What does the GRESB score section compare in this example portfolio analysis?\",\"answer\":\"It compares the portfolio’s overall results and sub-dimension results against benchmark averages and a peer-group context, including performance versus benchmark and peer group signals.\"},{\"question\":\"Which GRESB dimensions are covered in the portfolio summary?\",\"answer\":\"The report includes dimensions such as Management \\u0026 Policy and Social, alongside implementation and measurement-style areas reflected through weighted indicators.\"},{\"question\":\"What portfolio characteristics are listed under selection versus benchmark?\",\"answer\":\"It lists companies/funds counts, regions, property type groupings, GAV ranges, and the percentage of the portfolio not covered, separating portfolio selection characteristics from benchmark characteristics.\"}]","Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark - Example Portfolio Analysis - Report | PDF",1789262634]