[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-244014-105":53,"doc-detail-244014-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","gap-analysis-report-deliverable-d42-final","Gap Analysis Report - Deliverable D4.2 - Final","","Gap Analysis Report (Deliverable D4.2, final version) presents a structured assessment of solid waste management (SWM) within humanitarian actions (HA). It documents assumptions and methodology, reviews existing literature, and synthesizes evidence from interviews with humanitarian supply chain leaders and multiple case studies. The report defines gap-analysis rules, objectives and measurements, summarizes investigation lines linked to Task 4.2.2 and Task 4.3, and derives cumulative findings to inform the transition from current to desired SWM practices.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":51,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/gap-analysis-report-deliverable-d42-final/244014/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/gap-analysis-report-deliverable-d42-final/244014.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Ezra","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-20","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":73},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What does this deliverable D4.2 focus on?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"It focuses on performing a gap analysis of solid waste management (SWM) in humanitarian actions, moving from current practices to a desired state.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Which evidence sources are used to identify the gaps?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"The report uses a literature review, interviews with humanitarian supply chain leaders, and multiple case studies, aligned with tasks 4.2.2 and 4.3.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How are the gaps analyzed in the report?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The report establishes gap-analysis rules, objectives, and measurements, then applies investigation lines to derive cumulative findings.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},244014,1789210980,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":50,"category_name":51,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":73,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":125,"read_time":30},1099514068035,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Gap Analysis Report  \nDue date: 31/03/2025  \nResponsible partner: PRO CIVIS  \nDisclaimer:  \nThe content reflects the views of the authors only. The European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.  \nThis document contains information, that is proprietary to the Bio4HUMAN consortium. Neither this document nor the information contained herein shall be used, duplicated, or communicated by any means to any third party, in whole or in parts, except with the prior written consent of the Bio4HUMAN consortium. This restriction legend shall not be altered or obliterated on or from this document. Neither the European Commission nor the Bio4HUMAN project consortium are liable for any use that may be made of the information that it contains.  \nDocument information  \n\n| DELIVERABLE NUMBER | D4 .2. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| DELIVERABLE NAME | Gap Analysis Report |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| ANNEXES | Annex 1-Template for collecting data (Task 4.2.2)\u003Cbr>Annex 2-Gap analysis for solid waste management in humanitarian actions-basic approach (Task 4.3)\u003Cbr>Annex 3 – Summary of the literature review on evolvementon relevance of supply chain management in the humanitarian context (Task 4.2.2)\u003Cbr>Annex 4 – Summary of interviews with humanitarian supply chains leaders (Task 4.2.2)\u003Cbr>Annex 5 – Summary of the data collection on solid waste management from humanitarian operations through multiply studies (Task 4.2.2)\u003Cbr>Annex 6-List of bio-based solutions\u003Cbr>Annex 7-List of best practices in solid waste management |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| TYPE* | R: | X |  | DMP: |  | DATA: |  | DEC: |  |  |\n| DISSEMINATION LEVEL** | PU: |  | X | SEN: |  |  | EU\u003Cbr>CLASSIFIED: |  |  |  |\n| LEAD\u003Cbr>BENEFICIARY | PRO CIVIS Foundation for Education and Social Dialogue |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| DUE DATE | 31.03.2025 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| SUBMISSION DATE | 31.03.2025 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n\n*R — Document, report; DMP — Data Management Plan; DATA — data sets, microdata, etc; DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc.  \n**Public — fully open (automatically posted online); Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement; EU classified — restreint-ue/eu-restricted, confidentiel-ue/eu-confidential, secret-ue/eu-secret under decision 2015/444  \nDocument history  \n\n| ID | DATE | AUTHOR | CHANGE |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1. | 14.03.2025 | T. Pęczek (PRO CIVIS), A. Gajek (PRO CIVIS), A. Bądel (PRO CIVIS), D. Kuznowicz (PRO CIVIS), P. Sobczyk (PRO CIVIS) | Draft D4 .2 (v.1.0.) |\n| 2. | 17.03.2025 | A. Motola (Enspire), A. Glaser (Enspire), L. Amariuti (Enspire)\u003Cbr>C. Szablewski (WeLOOP), M. Llàcer Llàcer (AIMPLAS), A. Máñez Luna (AIMPLAS) | Revision of the document |\n| 3. | 19.03.2025 | L. Klejnowska (PAH), B. Dolińska (PAH) | Revision of the document |\n| 4. | 20.03.2025 | P. J. Martínez Hernandiz (ITENE)\u003Cbr>C. Casado Coterillo (UC) | Revision of the document |\n| 5. | 21.03.2025 | A. Nejedla, M. Smidova Skalova (PIN) | Revision of the document |\n| 6. | 21.03.2025 | T. Pęczek (PRO CIVIS), A. Gajek (PRO CIVIS), A. Bądel (PRO CIVIS), D. Kuznowicz (PRO CIVIS), P. Sobczyk (PRO CIVIS) | Draft D4 .2 (v.2.0.) |\n| 7. | 21.03.2025 | G. Moroney (IBF) | Revision of the document |\n| 8. | 23.03.2025 | A. Motola (Enspire) | Revision of the document |\n| 9. | 24.03.2025 | M. Llàcer Llàcer (AIMPLAS) | Revision of the document |\n| 10. | 26.03.2025 | T. Pęczek (PRO CIVIS), A. Gajek (PRO CIVIS), A. Bądel (PRO CIVIS), D. Kuznowicz (PRO CIVIS), P. Sobczyk (PRO CIVIS) | Final version of D4.2 and its annexes |\n\nContents  \nDocument information ...........................................................................................................3  \nDocument history ...................................................................................................................4  \nList of Tables ......................................","cbCaikZ4CHog4r7K","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikZ4CHog4r7K","pdf",861196,45,"English","# Executive summary\n# Introduction\n## Context and aims of Bio4HUMAN Project and WP4\n## Overview of HSC and SWM\n# Methodology\n## Initial remarks\n## SWM in SC-study tools\n## Investigation lines for identification of supply chain gaps (Task 4.2.2)\n## Identifying the gaps (Task 4.3)\n## Gap Analysis rules, objectives and measurements\n# Current state of SWM in HA\n## Literature review on SWM in HA\n## Humanitarian supply chain leaders overview on SWM\n## SWM in HA – multiply case studies\n## Cumulative results of the investigations lines under 4.2.2\n# Desired state of SWM in HA","[{\"question\":\"What does this deliverable D4.2 focus on?\",\"answer\":\"It focuses on performing a gap analysis of solid waste management (SWM) in humanitarian actions, moving from current practices to a desired state.\"},{\"question\":\"Which evidence sources are used to identify the gaps?\",\"answer\":\"The report uses a literature review, interviews with humanitarian supply chain leaders, and multiple case studies, aligned with tasks 4.2.2 and 4.3.\"},{\"question\":\"How are the gaps analyzed in the report?\",\"answer\":\"The report establishes gap-analysis rules, objectives, and measurements, then applies investigation lines to derive cumulative findings.\"}]","Gap Analysis Report - Deliverable D4.2 - Final | PDF"]