[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-253775-105":53,"doc-detail-253775-en":119},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":112,"head_meta":114,"extra_data":116,"updated_unix":118},105,"en","finalreport4-24-17-capacity-building-plan-for-chronic-disease-epidemiology-capacity","FINALREPORT4-24-17 - Capacity Building Plan for Chronic Disease Epidemiology Capacity","","Capacity building plan led by a CSTE Chronic Disease Advisory Workgroup aims to strengthen chronic disease epidemiology capacity at state and local health departments. The plan prioritizes recommendations and proposes potential strategies to implement selected priorities, using consensus-building methods with an advisory group, email and teleconferences, and qualitative input from key informant interviews. It links chronic disease epidemiology workforce and resource gaps to actionable steps for improving monitoring, understanding risk factors, and supporting prevention and control through policy and program development.",{"@graph":63,"@context":111},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/finalreport4-24-17-capacity-building-plan-for-chronic-disease-epidemiology-capacity/253775/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/finalreport4-24-17-capacity-building-plan-for-chronic-disease-epidemiology-capacity/253775.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Emma Wilson","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-20","2026-09-13",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"How were recommendations prioritized?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"An advisory group used qualitative input from key informant interviews and a modified multi-voting technique to narrow down primary actions they wanted to focus on to build capacity.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":113,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":115,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":117,"site_id":56},253775,1791724465,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":120},{"doc_id":117,"user_id":121,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":122,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":123,"file_id":124,"file_url":125,"file_type":126,"file_size":127,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":128,"language":129,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":130,"faqs":131,"seo_title":132,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":133,"read_time":30},3848291630094,"https://eur-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","This capacity building plan is a products of a CSTE Chronic Disease Advisory Workgroup lead by Juliet VanEenwyk, an Epidemiology Consultant. This plan outlines priority recommendations, and potential strategies to implement selected priorities to increase chronic disease epidemiology capacity.  \nThis publication was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 5U380T000143-03 from CDC. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC.  \nTable of Contents  \nEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1  \nBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................... 4  \nMETHODS ............................................................................................................................. 4  \nRESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 5  \nGuiding Principles and Preliminary List of Consolidated Recommendations....................... 5  \nKey Informant Interviews .................................................................................................... 8  \nPrioritized Recommendations and Suggested Potential Actions........................................17  \nDISCUSSION........................................................................................................................22  \nCONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................25  \nREFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 26  \nAppendix A. Advisory Group Members .............................................................................27  \nAppendix B: Prioritization Methods...................................................................................28  \nAppendix C: Summary of Consolidated Recommendations............................................35  \nAppendix D: Key Informants ..............................................................................................37  \nAppendix E: Initial Action Items and Voting......................................................................39  \nEXECUTIVE SUMMARY  \nBackground  \nChronic diseases are major contributors to morbidity and mortality among adults in the United States, affecting both younger and older adults and accounting for the majority of our nation’s annual health care costs.1 Chronic disease epidemiologists use data to monitor levels of chronic diseases and how these vary within population subgroups and to understand individual, sociocultural and environmental factors that put people at high risk of developing or failing to control chronic diseases. This information allows program planners and policy makers to maximize opportunities for preventing and controlling chronic diseases through program interventions and policy development. Chronic disease epidemiologists at state and local health departments bring local perspectives and knowledge to the analytic process and are often in the best positions to bring information about determinants and distributions of chronic diseases to local public health leadership, elected officials, healthcare providers and community organizations.  \nIn spite of the important contributions of chronic disease epidemiologists at state and local health departments in preventing and controlling chronic diseases, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists’ (CSTE) epidemiology capacity assessment (ECA) indicates that many state health departments have less than optimal chronic disease epidemiology capacity in terms of the number of chronic disease epidemiologists, their skill levels and access to resources needed to do their work. Anecdotal information since the last ECA in 2013 suggests that this insufficiency is","cbCaia577ZbSLZnu","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaia577ZbSLZnu","pdf",4816582,47,"English","# Executive Summary\n## Background and Objectives\n## Methods\n## Results\n## Discussion\n## Conclusions\n## References\n# Appendices\n## Advisory Group Members\n## Prioritization Methods\n## Summary of Consolidated Recommendations\n## Key Informants\n## Initial Action Items and Voting","[{\"question\":\"How were recommendations prioritized?\",\"answer\":\"An advisory group used qualitative input from key informant interviews and a modified multi-voting technique to narrow down primary actions they wanted to focus on to build capacity.\"}]","FINALREPORT4-24-17 - Capacity Building Plan for Chronic Disease Epidemiology Capacity | PDF",1789269964]