[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-244377-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":80,"doc-detail-244377-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","evaluation-of-the-haiti-earthquake-2010-meeting-shelter-needs-issues-achievements-and-constraints","Evaluation of the Haiti Earthquake 2010 Meeting Shelter Needs - Issues, Achievements and Constraints","","Evaluation of shelter needs after the Haiti earthquake in 2010, released December 2011, assessing how the shelter response was planned, delivered, and adjusted under operational pressures. The review follows IFRC evaluation principles and examines purpose, methodology, and the context of the shelter cluster, including key constraints and opportunities. Findings cover coordination across clusters, evolution of the shelter response strategy, adaptation to urban and prior housing plans, funding allocation to approaches, and the role of emergency shelter within transitional solutions.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/","General",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/evaluation-of-the-haiti-earthquake-2010-meeting-shelter-needs-issues-achievements-and-constraints/244377/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/evaluation-of-the-haiti-earthquake-2010-meeting-shelter-needs-issues-achievements-and-constraints/244377.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"River Wang","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-20","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":26},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What is the purpose and methodology of the Haiti shelter needs evaluation after the 2010 earthquake?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The document sets out the purpose of the review and describes the methodology used to assess the shelter needs meeting process and the shelter response context. It follows IFRC’s framework for evaluation to support reliable and useful findings.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"What were the main constraints and opportunities affecting the shelter response?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"The review identifies constraints and opportunities that shaped shelter delivery. It also analyzes how these factors influenced planning, emergency shelter, and early recovery or transitional shelter activities.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How did coordination and funding allocation influence the shelter response strategy and outcomes?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Findings discuss an integrated multi-cluster approach, coordination system difficulties, and how inter-cluster roles were distributed. The report also evaluates how funds were allocated across different shelter approaches and how costs evolved for T-Shelter and other solutions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},244377,1789216652,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,88,93,98,103,108,113,118,123],{"id":84,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":89,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":90,"show_sort_weight":91,"slug":92},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":94,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":99,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":104,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":105,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":107},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":109,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":110,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":114,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":115,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":119,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":124,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":125},158,"general-158",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":127},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":128,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":22,"category_id":124,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":26,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":79,"read_time":140},1099514067438,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002539ee87300030?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780474512215547542","An Evaluation of the Haiti Earthquake 2010 Meeting Shelter Needs:  \nIssues, Achievements and Constraints  \nDate of release: December, 2011  \nEstudios Proyectos y Planificación S.A.  \n[www.epypsa.com](www.epypsa.com)  \nLead consultants: Alfonso Calzadilla Beunza-Ignacio Martin Eresta  \nThis independent evaluation has been managed by IFRC‟s Shelter and Settlements Department in cooperation with the Planning and Evaluation Department. IFRC is committed to upholding its Framework for Evaluation. The framework is designed to promote reliable, useful, ethical evaluations that contribute to organizational learning, accountability, and our mission to best serve those in need. It demonstrates the IFRC‟s commitment to transparency, providing a publicly accessible document to all stakeholders so that they may better understand and participate in the evaluation function.  \nInternational Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC)  \nCase postale 372  \n1211 Genève 19 Suisse  \nTel: +41 22 730 4222  \nFax: +41 22 733 0395  \n[www.ifrc.org](www.ifrc.org)  \nDisclaimer  \nThe opinions expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by the IFRC of the opinions expressed.  \nContents  \nAbbreviations and acronyms ................................................................................................ 1  \nGlossary .............................................................................................................................. 2  \nAcknowledgements.............................................................................................................. 3  \nI. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4  \nII. BACKGROUND OF THE REVIEW ............................................................................... 8  \n1. Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 8  \n2. Methodology ................................................................................................................. 9  \n3. Context of the shelter response .................................................................................. 10  \nIII. DESCRIPTION OF THE SHELTER RESPONSE .................................................... 12  \n1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 12  \n1.1 Brief background of the Haiti Shelter Cluster ....................................................... 12  \n1.2 Summary of the Needs and Damages ................................................................. 12  \n2. Constraints and opportunities for the shelter response ............................................... 13  \n2.1 Constraints .......................................................................................................... 13  \n2.2 Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 18  \n3. Planning and delivery of emergency and early recovery shelter.................................. 19  \n3.1 Strategic planning. The Haiti Shelter Sector Response Plan................................ 19  \n3.2 Emergency Shelter planning and delivery ............................................................ 20  \n3.3 Early recovery / transitional shelter planning and delivery.................................... 21  \n3.4 House Repair....................................................................................................... 25  \n4. Allocation of funds to different approaches ................................................................. 27  \n4.1 Evolution of T-Shelter costs and budget allocation.....","cbCaicgwymg0t17U","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicgwymg0t17U","pdf",1854625,75,"English","# Abbreviations and acronyms\n# Glossary\n# Acknowledgements\n# EXECUTIVE SUMMARY\n# BACKGROUND OF THE REVIEW\n## Purpose\n## Methodology\n## Context of the shelter response\n# DESCRIPTION OF THE SHELTER RESPONSE\n## Introduction\n## Constraints and opportunities for the shelter response\n## Planning and delivery of emergency and early recovery shelter\n## Allocation of funds to different approaches\n# FINDINGS OF THE REVIEW\n## Integrated and multi-cluster approach\n## The shelter sector response strategy and its evolution\n## Shelter response's adaptation to the context\n## Emergency shelter as a basis for Transitional Shelter","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose and methodology of the Haiti shelter needs evaluation after the 2010 earthquake?\",\"answer\":\"The document sets out the purpose of the review and describes the methodology used to assess the shelter needs meeting process and the shelter response context. It follows IFRC’s framework for evaluation to support reliable and useful findings.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the main constraints and opportunities affecting the shelter response?\",\"answer\":\"The review identifies constraints and opportunities that shaped shelter delivery. It also analyzes how these factors influenced planning, emergency shelter, and early recovery or transitional shelter activities.\"},{\"question\":\"How did coordination and funding allocation influence the shelter response strategy and outcomes?\",\"answer\":\"Findings discuss an integrated multi-cluster approach, coordination system difficulties, and how inter-cluster roles were distributed. The report also evaluates how funds were allocated across different shelter approaches and how costs evolved for T-Shelter and other solutions.\"}]","Evaluation of the Haiti Earthquake 2010 Meeting Shelter Needs - Issues, Achievements and Constraints | PDF",26]