[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-177580-105":53,"doc-detail-177580-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","evaluation-of-the-evidence-of-the-recreational-water-quality-guidelines-section-free-living-organisms-technical-report","Evaluation of the Evidence of the Recreational Water Quality Guidelines - Section: Free-living organisms - Technical Report","","This technical report, prepared for the Recreational Water Quality Advisory Committee of the NHMRC, provides the detailed methodology and reporting basis for evaluating evidence supporting the recreational water quality guidelines for free-living organisms. It accompanies an evidence evaluation report that summarizes background, purpose, methodology and results. The technical report details research questions, evidence search and selection, study appraisal and quality assessment, data extraction and synthesis methods, and approaches for analysis, calculations, declared author interests, and related documentation.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/evaluation-of-the-evidence-of-the-recreational-water-quality-guidelines-section-free-living-organisms-technical-report/177580/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/evaluation-of-the-evidence-of-the-recreational-water-quality-guidelines-section-free-living-organisms-technical-report/177580.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Noah","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-10-23","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",13,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What is the purpose of this technical report within the overall evidence review?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"It provides the detailed methodology and supporting information that underpins the narrative evidence evaluation for free-living organisms used to inform updates to the NHMRC recreational water risk guidelines.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Which core steps of the evidence evaluation are documented in detail?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"The report covers research questions, search strategy and study selection criteria, evidence collection, literature appraisal and quality assessment, data extraction, and synthesis and analysis methods.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the report handle included studies and author disclosures?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"It includes documentation of declared interests of authors for each paper and provides explanatory text for calculations and assumptions used in the evaluation.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},177580,1791730467,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":142},8796095462418,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/80000253c1241d02b47?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1778826106357471780","\u0003\nAustralia’s National\u000bScience Agency\nEvaluation of the Evidence of the Recreational Water Quality Guidelines\nSection: Free-living organisms\nTechnical Report\nGeoffrey J Puzon, Anna H Kaksonen, Natalia Malinowski, Tom Walsh\nCSIRO\n22 August 2024\nReport to the Recreational Water Quality Advisory Committee of the National Health and Medical Research Council\n\u000f\u0004\nCitation\nPuzon GJ, Kaksonen AH, Malinowski N, Walsh T. 2024. Evaluation of the Evidence of the Recreational Water Quality Guidelines. Section: Free-living organisms. Technical Report to the Recreational Water Quality Advisory Committee of the National Health and Medical Research Council.\nCopyright\n© Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation 2024. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO.\nImportant disclaimer\nCSIRO advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it.\nCSIRO is committed to providing web accessible content wherever possible. If you are having difficulties with accessing this document please contact \u0013 HYPERLINK \"http://www.csiro.au/contact\" \\o \"Contact CSIRO\" \u0014csiro.au\u0015/contact.\nForeword\nThis Technical Report accompanies the associated Evidence Evaluation Report which together comprise a narrative review of evidence for the topic of free-living organisms to inform the update to the NHMRC Guidelines for Managing Risks in Recreational Water (2008).\nThe Evidence Evaluation Report is the primary document for this narrative review and contains the background, purpose of the review, a summary of the methodology and results and the full and complete discussion and conclusions for the primary and secondary questions and supplementary topics for the review.\nThis Technical Report contains detailed information about the full methodology used, including but not limited to:\nthe research questions;\nthe search strategy used to identify and retrieve studies;\nthe process for selecting studies (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria);\nthe methodology used to critically appraise the literature and the quality assessment of included studies;\nthe methods used for data extraction;\nthe methods used to critically appraise and synthesise the data of included studies;\nthe methods used to analyse and summarise the results of included studies;\nthe methods used for any calculations and explanatory text for any assumptions if used;\ndocumentation of the declared interest(s) of the author(s) of each paper;\n\u000f\nContents\n\u0013 TOC \\h \\z \\t \"Heading 1,2,Heading 2,3,PartTitle,1,Heading 1 Numbered,2,Heading 1 not numbered,2,Heading 2 not numbered,3,Appendix Heading 1,2\" \u0014\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc173935760\" \u0014Foreword\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc173935760 \\h \u00143\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc173935761\" \u0014Acknowledgments\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc173935761 \\h \u001412\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc173935762\" \u00141\tIntroduction\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc173935762 \\h \u001413\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc173935763\" \u00141.1\tBackground and purpose\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc173935763 \\h \u001413\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc173935764\" \u00141.2\tPurpose of the Review\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc173935764 \\h \u001413\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc173935765\" \u00141.3\tApproach\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc173935765 \\h \u001413\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 HYPERLINK \\l \"_Toc173935766\" \u00142\tMethodology\t\u0013 PAGEREF _Toc173935766 \\h \u001415\u0015\u0015\n\u0013 H","cbCaiu7LsZ7saIMO","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiu7LsZ7saIMO","docx",770316,290,"English","# Foreword\n## Acknowledgments\n## 1 Introduction\n## 1.1 Background and purpose\n## 1.2 Purpose of the Review\n## 1.3 Approach\n## 2 Methodology\n## 2.1 Research Questions\n## 2.2 Search Strategy and Selection of Evidence\n## 2.3 Evidence Collection\n## 2.4 Data extraction\n## 2.5 Process for assessing the Body of Evidence\n## 3 Literature search results\n## 3.1 Existing guidelines/reports\n## 3.2 Primary studies\n## 4 Full list of included studies\n## 4.1 Existing guidelines\n## 4.2 Literature reviews\n## 4.3 Grey literature\n## 4.4 Primary studies\n## 5 Completed quality assessment and data extraction for the included guidelines and literature reviews","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of this technical report within the overall evidence review?\",\"answer\":\"It provides the detailed methodology and supporting information that underpins the narrative evidence evaluation for free-living organisms used to inform updates to the NHMRC recreational water risk guidelines.\"},{\"question\":\"Which core steps of the evidence evaluation are documented in detail?\",\"answer\":\"The report covers research questions, search strategy and study selection criteria, evidence collection, literature appraisal and quality assessment, data extraction, and synthesis and analysis methods.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report handle included studies and author disclosures?\",\"answer\":\"It includes documentation of declared interests of authors for each paper and provides explanatory text for calculations and assumptions used in the evaluation.\"}]","Evaluation of the Evidence of the Recreational Water Quality Guidelines - Section: Free-living organisms - Technical Report | DOCX",1788328433,102]