[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-240368-105":53,"doc-detail-240368-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","end-project-report-version-10-project-closure-and-management-effectiveness-review","End Project Report - Version 1.0 - Project Closure and Management Effectiveness Review","","End project report template for documenting project closure and evaluating management effectiveness across the full project lifecycle. Includes sections to record expected deliverables, purposes, and achieved or unachieved objectives with reasons, plus sign-offs and acceptances. Covers approved changes, handover of outstanding risks and issues, and a structured post-project review plan. Also provides a governance, planning and control, stakeholder, supplier, quality, and risk management effectiveness review, followed by lessons learned and recommended good practices.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/end-project-report-version-10-project-closure-and-management-effectiveness-review/240368/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/end-project-report-version-10-project-closure-and-management-effectiveness-review/240368.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Jake","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":45},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What should be documented in the project closure purpose section?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The expected deliverables, why the project was needed, and the long-term benefits realized or planned.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How should objectives achieved vs. not achieved be recorded?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Reference the initiation document objectives, describe what was achieved and not achieved with reasons, note any objective changes, and record measured benefits if available.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What areas are covered in the effectiveness review of project management?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"Governance; planning and control; stakeholder management; supplier management; quality management; and risk and issue management, including evidence of effectiveness.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},240368,1791624817,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":45,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":76},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","[stakeholdermap.com](stakeholdermap.com)  \nProject Management, project planning, templates and advice  \n[COMPANY OR PROJECT LOGO]  \n\u003CPROJECT NAME>   \nEND PROJECT REPORT   \nVERSION \u003C1 . 0>  \n\u003CDD/MM/YYYY>  \n\n| Project/Programme Name |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Project Sponsor |  |  |  |\n| Project/Programme Manager |  |  |  |\n| Start Date |  | Completion Date |  |\n\nPART 1: PROJECT CLOSURE  \nPURPOSE OF THE PROJECT  \n\u003CExplain what the project was expected to deliver, why the project was needed and what the long-term benefits have been or will be.>  \nOBJECTIVES ACHIEVED/NOT ACHIEVED  \n\u003CReference the objectives in the project initiation document and describe what has been achieved, and what has and has not been achieved with reasons. If there were any changes to the project objectives since the project initiation document was approved they should be documented here. If any benefits were realized during the life of the project they should also be documented here and measured if possible.>  \nACCEPTANCES AND SIGN-OFFS \u003CDescribe the sign offs that were completed and have been confirmed at the end   \nof the project. For example user acceptance testing sign off, security and data protection approval legal sign off, milestone sign offs and any official contractually required closure certificates.>  \n\n| Sign-off received? | Milestone/Deliverable |\n| --- | --- |\n|  |  |\n|  |  |\n|  |  |\n\n\n|  |  |\n| --- | --- |\n\nCHANGES INCORPORATED  \n\u003CUsing the change log document the changes that were approved after the project initiation document was signed off. For each change document the benefit, cost, time and quality implications of that change. >  \nOUTSTANDING RISKS AND ISSUES  \n\u003CIf any risks are relevant post go life or post project close they need to be handed over to the appropriate teams for inclusion in their operational risk management. The same goes for any outstanding issues and any outstanding requests for change that were unable to be implemented during the project lifecycle. For example, known defects or workarounds there are acceptable for go-live but need to be resolved in the future.>  \nPOST PROJECT REVIEW  \n\u003CDocument the plan ofaction for the Post Project review with suggested timings, attendees and ownership. Check the benefits realisation plan to help determine the agenda and the timing of the review. >  \n\n| \u003Cbr>PART 2: REVIEW OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT |\n| --- |\n| GOVERNANCE |\n\n\u003CAnswer the following questions. How well was the project organised? Were roles and responsibilities clear? Did project team have the right mix of skill sets and authority to meet their project responsibilities? Was the business case used for decision-making throughout the lifecycle of the project? Were the stakeholders engaged and managed effectively? Was the communication management strategy effective?>  \nPLANNING AND CONTROL  \n\u003CHow good were the plans and estimates for resources? How good were estimates of effort, time and cost? Were the monitoring and control mechanisms timely and effective? Was governance and control at the right level?>  \nSTAKE HOLDER MANAGEMENT  \n\u003CWas stakeholder identification, management and engagement successful and effective? Did the stakeholders engage as expected?>  \nSUPPLIER MANAGEMENT  \n\u003CWere the selection procedures appropriate and effective? Are supplier management processes and procedures effective? Were there any issues with supplier performance?>  \nQUALITY MANAGEMENT  \n\u003CDid the deliverables meet the quality criteria? Did the team have the right skill mix to deliver quality deliverables? Were any errors or problems detected early enough to fix at lowest possible cost?>  \nRISK AND ISSUE MANAGEMENT  \n\u003CHow effective were the risk management processes and procedures? Did any issues occur that could have been predicted? Was the risk register effective? In this section it is worth considering what evidence there is that risk management prevented or reduced the impact of damaging events?>  \nPART 3: SHARING","cbCaivxld8R803X0","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivxld8R803X0","pdf",254148,7,"English","# PART 1: PROJECT CLOSURE\n## PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT\n## OBJECTIVES ACHIEVED/NOT ACHIEVED\n## ACCEPTANCES AND SIGN-OFFS\n## CHANGES INCORPORATED\n## OUTSTANDING RISKS AND ISSUES\n## POST PROJECT REVIEW\n# PART 2: REVIEW OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT\n## GOVERNANCE\n## PLANNING AND CONTROL\n## STAKE HOLDER MANAGEMENT\n## SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT\n## QUALITY MANAGEMENT\n## RISK AND ISSUE MANAGEMENT\n# PART 3: SHARING LESSONS LEARNED\n## RECOMMENDED GOOD PRACTICES\n## LESSONS LEARNED","[{\"question\":\"What should be documented in the project closure purpose section?\",\"answer\":\"The expected deliverables, why the project was needed, and the long-term benefits realized or planned.\"},{\"question\":\"How should objectives achieved vs. not achieved be recorded?\",\"answer\":\"Reference the initiation document objectives, describe what was achieved and not achieved with reasons, note any objective changes, and record measured benefits if available.\"},{\"question\":\"What areas are covered in the effectiveness review of project management?\",\"answer\":\"Governance; planning and control; stakeholder management; supplier management; quality management; and risk and issue management, including evidence of effectiveness.\"}]","End Project Report - Version 1.0 - Project Closure and Management Effectiveness Review | PDF",1789160540]