[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-563603-105":53,"doc-detail-563603-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","e-sus-partial-capo-comparison-chart-ratings-by-harvey-reid-2018","E-sus Partial Capo Comparison Chart - Ratings by Harvey Reid 2018","","E-sus partial capo comparison chart evaluating multiple capo brands and models for 3-string partial capo use. The chart lists retail price, weight, and practical performance ratings across criteria such as tuning adjustability, appearance, attachment method, access under the capo, reach over it, compatibility with wider or narrow fingerboards, and performance at higher frets and actions. It also covers suitability for nylon/classical, 12-string, and instruments like banjo, mando, and ukulele, plus clamping behavior and setup features like trimming and storage.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":51,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/e-sus-partial-capo-comparison-chart-ratings-by-harvey-reid-2018/563603/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/e-sus-partial-capo-comparison-chart-ratings-by-harvey-reid-2018/563603.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Theodore","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-10-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What key features does the chart compare for each partial capo model?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"It compares retail price and weight, then rates practical usability traits such as tension adjustment, attachment behavior, access around/under the capo, and suitability for different neck widths and fret/action positions.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Which instruments and string types does the chart address?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"It includes guidance for nylon-string/classical use, 12-string setups, and whether models are useful on banjo, mando, and uke, based on the chart’s ratings.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the chart handle compatibility for fingerboards, frets, and string gauges?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"The chart provides separate rating rows for wider vs narrow necks, performance at higher frets (7–9), and compatibility with heavier string gauges, helping readers select the best match for their setup.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},563603,1792339895,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":50,"category_name":51,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":9,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":4},7971461740886,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","| 3-String “E-sus” Partial Capo Comparison Chart (ratings by Harvey Reid 2018) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Brand & Model ––> | Liberty FLIP\u003Cbr>Model 43 | Shubb\u003Cbr>c7b | Kyser\u003Cbr>Short-Cut | Kyser K-Lever\u003Cbr>“Open G” | Kyser K-Lever\u003Cbr>“DADGAD” | G7 Newport\u003Cbr>\\#3 | Thalia\u003Cbr>Capo | Third\u003Cbr>Hand | Spider\u003Cbr>Capo |\n| • • • • • = works perfectly\u003Cbr>• • • • = quite well/most of time • • • = reasonably/OK\u003Cbr>• • = poorly/ sometimes\u003Cbr>• = barely/sort of/might work x = not at all | \u003Cbr>Reversible– also can clamp 4 strings | | | \u003Cbr>discontinued | \u003Cbr>discontinued | | | \u003Cbr>discontinued | |\n| Retail price | $30 | $27 | $27 | $56 | $56 | $40 | $75 | $25 | $40 |\n| Weight | .7 oz. | 1.7 oz | 1.3 oz | 1.6 oz | 1.5 oz | 1.4 oz | 3.2 oz | 1.1 oz | 1.2 oz |\n| Easily adjust tension | • • • • • | • • • | x | x | x | • • • • | x | • • | • • |\n| Attractive appearance | • • • • • | • • • • | • • • | • | • | • • • • • | • • • • • | x | x |\n| Attaches from either side | • • • • • | • • • • | • • • | • | • | • • • • | • | • • • • • | x |\n| Access notes under capo | • • • • | • • • • | • • • | • • • • • | • • • • • | • • • • | x | • | • |\n| Reach around & over the capo | • • • • | • • • • | • • • | • | • | • • • • | • | • | x |\n| Good with wider fingerboards | • • • • • | • • • • • | • • • | • • • | x | • • • • • | x | • • • • • | • • • |\n| Good for narrow (i.e. Fender) necks | • • • | • • • | • • • • • | • • • • • | • • • • • | x | • • | • • • • • | • • • • • |\n| Can shorten/trim if needed | • • • • | • • • • • | • | x | x | • • • | x | • • • • | x |\n| Works well with thicker necks | • • • • • | • • • | x | x | x | • | • • | • • • • | • • • • • |\n| Works well with thin necks | • • • • • | • • • | • • • • | • • • • | • • • • | x | • • | • • • • • | • • • • • |\n| Works well at higher frets (7-9) | • • • • • | • • • | • • | • | • | • | • • | • • • • • | • • • • • |\n| Good with higher action | • • • • • | • • • • | • • • • | • • • • | • • • • | x | • • • • | • • • • • | • • • • |\n| Good with heavier string gauges | • • • • • | • • • • • | • • • • | • • • • | • • • • | • • • • | • • • | • • • • | • • |\n| Works well on nylon-string/classical | • • • • | x | x | x | x | x | x | • • • • | • |\n| Works well on 12-string | • • • • • | • • • | x | x | x | • | • | • • • | x |\n| Is useful on banjo/mando/uke | • • • • • | • | • | • | • | • • | x | • • • | x |\n| Clamps 4 inner strings | • • • • • | x | x | x | x | x | x | • • • • • | • • • • • |\n| Clamps 4 outer strings | • • • • | x | x | x | x | x | x | • • • • • | • • • • • |\n| Does Liberty Tuning Version 1 | • • • • • | • | • | • • | • | • | • • • • | • • • • | • • • • |\n| Does Liberty Tuning Version 2 | • • • • • | x | x | x | x | x | x | • • • • | • • • • |\n| Fits easily in your pocket | • • • • • | • • • • | • | • | • | • • • | • | • | • |\n| Attaches quickly | • • • | • • • • | • • • • • | • • • • • | • • • • • | • • • | • • • • | • • • | x |\n| Move mid-song to another fret | • | • | • • • • • | • • • • • | • • • • • | • | • • • • | • | x |\n| Change configuration while attached | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | • • • • |\n| Stores on headstock | • • • | x | • • • • • | • • • • • | • • • • • | x | nut | x | x |","cbCaijEgboDNo14E","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijEgboDNo14E","pdf",336966,"English","# Brand & model comparison\n## Rating criteria and compatibility checks","[{\"question\":\"What key features does the chart compare for each partial capo model?\",\"answer\":\"It compares retail price and weight, then rates practical usability traits such as tension adjustment, attachment behavior, access around/under the capo, and suitability for different neck widths and fret/action positions.\"},{\"question\":\"Which instruments and string types does the chart address?\",\"answer\":\"It includes guidance for nylon-string/classical use, 12-string setups, and whether models are useful on banjo, mando, and uke, based on the chart’s ratings.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the chart handle compatibility for fingerboards, frets, and string gauges?\",\"answer\":\"The chart provides separate rating rows for wider vs narrow necks, performance at higher frets (7–9), and compatibility with heavier string gauges, helping readers select the best match for their setup.\"}]","E-sus Partial Capo Comparison Chart - Ratings by Harvey Reid 2018 | PDF",1791836784]