[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-219159-105":53,"doc-detail-219159-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","dissent-in-and-for-the-church-a-search-book","Dissent In and For the Church - A Search Book","","A Search Book explores the Roman Catholic Church’s internal disputes during the Second Vatican Council era, focusing on the environment of protest and dissent among clergy and laity. It centers on the far-reaching public disagreement with Pope Paul VI’s birth-control encyclical Humanae Vitae, where dissenters often did not view themselves as disloyal to the Church. The book details how theologians and other academics in multiple regions responded, including the Washington statement issued July 30, 1968, and the broader reactions that followed.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":51,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/dissent-in-and-for-the-church-a-search-book/219159/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/dissent-in-and-for-the-church-a-search-book/219159.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Noah","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document","2026-09-22","2026-09-08",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":76},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What central issue does the book address during this period of church unrest?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The book centers on dissent from Pope Paul VI’s birth-control encyclical Humanae Vitae and the widespread, public disagreement it triggered.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How does the text describe the kind of dissenters involved in the disagreement?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"It describes theologians, clerics, and laypeople who voiced disagreement, noting that many did not regard themselves as disloyal or cut off from union with the Church.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What role did the Washington, D.C. statement dated July 30, 1968 play?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The text states that a statement released on July 30, 1968 in the name of eighty-seven American theologians was later endorsed by more than 600 Catholic academicians qualified in sacred sciences.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},219159,1790043472,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":50,"category_name":51,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":73,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":32},8796095462418,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/80000253c1241d02b47?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1778826106357471780","Dissent In and For the Church\nTheologians and Humanae Vitae\nby CHARLES E. CURRAN, ROBERT E. HUNT and the \"Subject Professors\" with JOHN F. HUNT and TERRENCE R. CONNELLY\nA Search Book\nSheed & Ward • New York\nThe translations of the Documents of Second Vatican Council are those translated by the National Catholic Welfare Conference, Washington, D. C.\n© Sheed and Ward, Inc., 1969\nLibrary of Congress Catalog Card Number 70-92530\nStandard Book Number 8362-0050-0 (Paperback Edition) and 8362-0064-0 (Library Edition)\nManufactured in the United States of America\nAcknowledgments\nThis volume represents the joint efforts of the twenty Catholic University professors and their legal and academic counsel. The professors collaborated on their theological defense presented to the Board of Inquiry and on all the other aspects involved in the long and tedious process of the Inquiry. Naturally there were some who devoted more of their time to the Inquiry and to the prepara¬tion of this volume, but it would be an impossible task to single out particular individuals. Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the defense of our declaration and action was the communal and collaborative effort on the part of all involved, and this testifies in an eloquent manner to the basic Christian and academic commit¬ments of the professors themselves.\nWe, the \"subject professors,\" will never be able to express adequately our gratitude to the law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore of New York City, and in particular to Mr. John F. Hunt, Jr., and Mr. Terrence R. Connelly, his associate. Without legal counsel of such stature and skill, our case could not have been presented so forcibly. Their contributions and their personal interest in \"their clients\" remain a happy memory for all.\nRobert K. Webb, Professor of History at Columbia University and Editor of The American Historical Review, despite an already overcrowded calendar, volunteered to serve as our academic coun¬sel. His competence and help in this role made even more emphatic his commitment to academic life and his willingness to undergo great personal sacrifice for this commitment.\nThe staff of the National Office of the American Association of University Professors, without making any prejudgments on the case, was always most competent and gracious in furnishing us with authoritative interpretations and directions.\nThe expert witnesses mentioned by name in the text who willingly testified on our behalf gave to our case the prestige and authority of their own outstanding reputations.\nThe members of the Inquiry Panel, Dean Donald E. Marlowe, Professor E. Catherine Dunn, Dean Frederick R. McManus, Pro¬fessor Antanas Suziedelis, Reverend Doctor Eugene I. Van Ant¬werp and Professor Kenneth L. Schmitz, generously gave many hundreds of hours of their otherwise busy lives in order con¬scientiously to discharge their responsibilities on behalf of the University in connection with the Inquiry. In their work they exhibited an intellectual honesty and scholarly dedication that enhances the reputation of the University with which they are associated.\nvi\nHerder & Herder graciously permitted us to use some materials which were originally published in Contraception: Authority and Dissent, ed., C. E.\nCurran (New York, 1969)\nPreface\nDuring the present decade, it has become increasingly clear that the Roman Catholic Church is not a monolithic structure, secure from the concerns of its constituencies. The debates surrounding the Second Vatican Council sparked ferment and renewal within the Church. As this has become characterized by protest and dissent, the Church has experienced the same phenomenon which has confronted other institutions in our culture. Priests protest against their bishops; laymen form groups independent of ec¬clesiastical direction; underground movements virtually separate themselves from the institutional church; men and women leave the religious life for secular occupations in greater number than ever before. I","cbCaiqohiuZQjfxt","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqohiuZQjfxt","docx",218347,144,"English","# Acknowledgments\n# Preface\n## Dissent after the Second Vatican Council\n## Humanae Vitae and public disagreement\n## The Washington statement and broader reactions","[{\"question\":\"What central issue does the book address during this period of church unrest?\",\"answer\":\"The book centers on dissent from Pope Paul VI’s birth-control encyclical Humanae Vitae and the widespread, public disagreement it triggered.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the text describe the kind of dissenters involved in the disagreement?\",\"answer\":\"It describes theologians, clerics, and laypeople who voiced disagreement, noting that many did not regard themselves as disloyal or cut off from union with the Church.\"},{\"question\":\"What role did the Washington, D.C. statement dated July 30, 1968 play?\",\"answer\":\"The text states that a statement released on July 30, 1968 in the name of eighty-seven American theologians was later endorsed by more than 600 Catholic academicians qualified in sacred sciences.\"}]","Dissent In and For the Church - A Search Book | DOCX",1788861744]