[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-351357-105":53,"doc-detail-351357-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","csu-teacher-education-lesson-plan-rubric","CSU Teacher Education Lesson Plan Rubric","","CSU Teacher Education Lesson Plan Rubric evaluates teacher candidates’ ability to describe an effective learning trajectory. It defines four formative performance levels from Ineffective to Exemplary, with ratings from 1.0 to 4.0 across 16 performance criteria organized into four categories: Central Focus, Instructional Strategies and Learning Tasks, Academic Language Demands, and Reflection. The rubric supports formative assessment during clinical practice and informs summative pass/fail decisions based on an established proficiency target and cut-score.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/csu-teacher-education-lesson-plan-rubric/351357/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/csu-teacher-education-lesson-plan-rubric/351357.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Ivy","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-08","2026-09-22",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":73},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What is the purpose of the CSU Teacher Education Lesson Plan Rubric?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"It assesses and monitors candidates’ ability to provide a detailed description of the lesson’s course of instruction or learning trajectory. It also supports developing an effective lesson plan for classroom readiness.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How are formative scores interpreted in the rubric?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"The rubric uses four performance levels—1 Ineffective, 2 Needs Development, 3 Proficient, and 4 Exemplary—mapped to a developmentally sequenced 4-point scale. Ratings per criterion range from 1.0 to 4.0.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the rubric determine the pass or fail decision?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The total score across 16 performance criteria is used for pass/fail. Proficiency is targeted at level 3, with a cut-score of 34; scores of 33 or less require remediation.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},351357,1791498693,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":135,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":79},549758252649,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/8000253669c5317157?_k=1778319167496531819","CSU TEACHER EDUCATION LESSON PLAN RUBRIC  \nTeacher Candidate:  Date:  \nPerson Completing Form:   Course\\#:  (Mark one) Practicum:   Internship:   Class lesson plan:   Lesson Focus:   Grade Level:    \nPurpose of Assessment: The Lesson Plan rubric is designed to assess and monitor candidates’ ability to provide a detailed description of the course of instruction or learning trajectory of a lesson. Developing an effective lesson plan is essential for being an effective classroom teacher. The Clayton State University Lesson Plan Rubric is used together with the Clayton State University Lesson Plan Template and the Clayton State University Lesson Plan Guiding Questions. All three documents are aligned with: The Clayton State University Education Unit Conceptual Framework; the Council of Chief State School Officers (InTASC) Dispositions, CAEP, GAPSC Standards and edTPA language and expectations. The rubric is used during clinical practice by both the cooperating teacher, the pedagogy and/or content supervisors for a formative assessment throughout the program, especially during the practicum and internship.  \nFormative Score Interpretation: The rubric is a 4-point developmentally sequenced performance level scale which provides a framework for adequately evaluating candidates’ ability to detail the learning trajectory of a lesson. The four performance levels are: (1) Ineffective; (2) Needs Development; (3) Proficient; and,(4) Exemplary. Thus, the rating per performance criterion ranges from 1.0 to 4.0. A candidate who is considered classroom ready or proficient exhibits Level 3 performance characteristics. The rubric has 16 Performance Criteria, organized under four categories, Central Focus, Instructional Strategies and Learning Tasks, Academic Language Demands and Reflection. These Performance Criteria are aligned with the CSU Conceptual Framework (2012) that projects a CSU-prepared teacher-candidate as one that “engages in Reflective Practice and is Competent, Caring, Committed, Collaborative, and Culturally Responsive.” Consequences of scoring a 1.0 or 2.0 on any performance criterion from a formative use of the rubric during a lesson plan development in a course or during the practicum or internship includes remediation by the course professor or the university supervisor and may include multiple rewrites of the lesson plan until it is determined adequate or proficient.  \nSummative Score Interpretation: The total score on the 16 performance criteria will be used for making a pass or fail decision. Since each of the 16 performance criteria is rated from 1, ineffective, to a high of 4, exemplary, possible total score ranges from 16 (1 X 16) to 64 (4 X 16), with a Proficiency score of 48 (3X16) . Given that Proficiency level score is considered the target score for interns, it was determined, following the CSU grading policy, that 70% of the target score would serve as the appropriate cut-score or lower boundary for minimum acceptable performance level for a candidate on the lesson plan assessment. This yields a pass score of 34 (i.e. 70% of 48 = 33 .6) . Thus, a candidate that earns a total score of 33 or less is referred to remediation. Performance criteria that receive scores of 1 or 2 will be revised until total score reaches 34.  \nDirections: Please use the following rubric to evaluate the lesson planning of your candidate. Use your professional knowledge and experiences to make a decision regarding the candidate’s progress toward demonstrating an effective learning trajectory of a lesson, deemed essential for being a classroom teacher. The four performance levels are: (1) Ineffective; (2) Needs Development; (3) Proficient; and,(4) Exemplary. A candidate who is considered classroom ready, proficient or on target exhibits the type of development of a plan that exemplifies Level 3.  \n1. LEARNING CENTRAL FOCUS  \n(Planning)  \n\n| Performance Criteria | 1-Ineffective | 2 – Needs Development | 3 – Proficient | 4 = Exemplary |\n| --- ","cbCairIjfTL7sLJh","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairIjfTL7sLJh","pdf",525973,7,10,"English","# Purpose of Assessment\n# Formative Score Interpretation\n# Summative Score Interpretation\n# Directions\n# Learning Central Focus","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the CSU Teacher Education Lesson Plan Rubric?\",\"answer\":\"It assesses and monitors candidates’ ability to provide a detailed description of the lesson’s course of instruction or learning trajectory. It also supports developing an effective lesson plan for classroom readiness.\"},{\"question\":\"How are formative scores interpreted in the rubric?\",\"answer\":\"The rubric uses four performance levels—1 Ineffective, 2 Needs Development, 3 Proficient, and 4 Exemplary—mapped to a developmentally sequenced 4-point scale. Ratings per criterion range from 1.0 to 4.0.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the rubric determine the pass or fail decision?\",\"answer\":\"The total score across 16 performance criteria is used for pass/fail. Proficiency is targeted at level 3, with a cut-score of 34; scores of 33 or less require remediation.\"}]","CSU Teacher Education Lesson Plan Rubric | PDF",1790093715]