[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-244730-105":53,"doc-detail-244730-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","community-action-project-priority-table-planning-matrix","Community Action Project Priority Table - Planning Matrix","","Community Action Project Priority Table provides a scoring matrix for a Parish Council to prioritise community projects fairly, transparently, and consistently. It evaluates projects using defined criteria: community benefit, feasibility, cost and resources, alignment with the council’s vision, and urgency. A structured scoring guidance (1–5 scale) ensures councillors apply shared judgment, supporting evidence-based planning. Additional multi-year planning and an action plan template connect priorities to year 1 delivery, year 2–3 development, and longer-term ambitions for clear accountability and resident impact.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/community-action-project-priority-table-planning-matrix/244730/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/community-action-project-priority-table-planning-matrix/244730.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Lucas Martin","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":47},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What criteria does the Community Action Project Priority Table use to score projects?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"Projects are scored on community benefit, feasibility, cost and resources (where lower cost scores higher), alignment with the council’s vision, and urgency. Each criterion uses a 1–5 scale and the table sums to a total score.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How should councillors apply the matrix when prioritising projects?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Councillors score independently, then scores are averaged or discussed collectively. The highest-scoring projects become Year 1 priorities, mid-range projects become Year 2 or opportunistic priorities, and low-scoring projects are deferred or reconsidered. The final list is published for transparency.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What does the Multi-Year Planning Overview include?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"It maps projects across Year 1 delivery (2026–27), Year 2–3 development, and long-term ambitions. It also includes a notes column to capture additional context for planning decisions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},244730,1791250468,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":47,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":47,"language":135,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":139,"read_time":73},8796095360427,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","Community Action Project Priority Table  \nPurpose  \nThis scoring matrix helps the Parish Council prioritise projects fairly, transparently, and consistently. It ensures decisions are based on clear criteria: community benefit, feasibility, cost, alignment with the council’s vision, and urgency.  \nUsing this tool supports evidence-based planning, improves accountability, and helps the council focus resources on the projects that will deliver the greatest positive impact for residents.  \nProject Priority Scoring Table  \n\n| Project Title\u003Cbr>(from Neighbourhood Plan Community Action Projects) | Community\u003Cbr>Benefit (1–5) | Feasibility (1– 5) | Cost & Resources (1–5)\u003Cbr>(lower cost = higher score) | Alignment with Council Vision (1–5) | Urgency (1–5) | Total Score |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Bus shelter at The Huntsman end of the village |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Central green space |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Information boards at former landfill site |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Quiet Lanes |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Speed reduction measures |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Village map |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Village sign |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n\nScoring Guidance (1–5 Scale)  \nUse this guidance to ensure consistent scoring across councillors.  \n1. Community Benefit (1–5)  \nHow much will the project improve life for residents?  \n• 5 – Major benefit: Large proportion of residents; improves wellbeing, safety, or inclusion.  \n• 4 – Strong benefit: Helps many residents or a key group.  \n• 3 – Moderate benefit: Useful but limited in scope.  \n• 2 – Small benefit: Helps a small group or niche need.  \n• 1 – Minimal benefit: Very limited or unclear impact.  \n2. Feasibility (1–5)  \nHow realistic is it for the council to deliver?  \n• 5 – Very feasible: Straightforward; within council control.  \n• 4 – Feasible: Some dependencies but manageable.  \n• 3 – Moderate: Requires coordination or permissions.  \n• 2 – Challenging: Significant barriers.  \n• 1 – Very difficult: Low likelihood of delivery.  \nSPC Community Action Project Priority Matrix Page 1 of 2  \n3. Cost & Resources (1–5)  \nHigher score = lower cost / lower resource demand.  \n• 5 – Very low cost: Minimal spend; volunteer-friendly.  \n• 4 – Low cost: Small spend; manageable within budget.  \n• 3 – Moderate: Requires planned allocation or small grant.  \n• 2 – High cost: Significant spend; external funding needed.  \n• 1 – Very high cost: Major capital or long-term funding.  \n4. Alignment with Council Vision (1–5) How well does the project support strategic aims?  \n• 5 – Strong alignment: Directly delivers core priorities.  \n• 4 – Good alignment: Supports one or more major themes.  \n• 3 – Moderate: Helpful but not central.  \n• 2 – Weak: Only loosely connected.  \n• 1 – None: Not linked to council vision.  \n5. Urgency (1–5)  \nHow time-sensitive is the project?  \n• 5 – Immediate: Safety, statutory, or time-critical.  \n• 4 – High: Should be addressed within 12 months.  \n• 3 – Medium: Important but not urgent.  \n• 2 – Low: Can wait 1–2 years.  \n• 1 – Very low: No time pressure.  \nHow the Council Should Use This Matrix  \n• Each councillor scores independently.  \n• Scores are averaged or discussed collectively.  \n• Highest-scoring projects become Year 1 priorities.  \n• Mid-range projects become Year 2 or opportunistic priorities.  \n• Low-scoring projects are deferred or reconsidered.  \n• The final list is published for transparency.  \nSPC Community Action Project Priority Matrix Page 2 of 2  \nMulti-Year Planning Overview Use this to map which projects are:  \n• Year 1 (2026–27) Delivery  \n• Year 2–3 Development  \n• Long-term ambitions  \n\n| Project | Year 1 Delivery | Year 2\u003Cbr>Development | Year 3\u003Cbr>Development | Long-Term | Notes |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |\n\nReview Points:  \n(e.g., review at Council meetings.)  \nSPC Multi-Year Planning Overview 10 May 2026  \nCouncil Action Plan Template (2026–27 and Beyond)  \nPurpose: To set out clear actions, re","cbCaibgcRRvx6vdw","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaibgcRRvx6vdw","pdf",276585,"English","# Community Action Project Priority Table\n## Purpose\n## Project Priority Scoring Table\n## Scoring Guidance (1–5 Scale)\n## How the Council Should Use This Matrix\n# Multi-Year Planning Overview\n## Year 1 Delivery / Year 2–3 Development / Long-term Ambitions\n# Council Action Plan Template (2026–27 and Beyond)\n## Purpose and Required Fields\n## Action Step Table\n## Success Measures / KPIs\n## Review Points","[{\"question\":\"What criteria does the Community Action Project Priority Table use to score projects?\",\"answer\":\"Projects are scored on community benefit, feasibility, cost and resources (where lower cost scores higher), alignment with the council’s vision, and urgency. Each criterion uses a 1–5 scale and the table sums to a total score.\"},{\"question\":\"How should councillors apply the matrix when prioritising projects?\",\"answer\":\"Councillors score independently, then scores are averaged or discussed collectively. The highest-scoring projects become Year 1 priorities, mid-range projects become Year 2 or opportunistic priorities, and low-scoring projects are deferred or reconsidered. The final list is published for transparency.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the Multi-Year Planning Overview include?\",\"answer\":\"It maps projects across Year 1 delivery (2026–27), Year 2–3 development, and long-term ambitions. It also includes a notes column to capture additional context for planning decisions.\"}]","Community Action Project Priority Table - Planning Matrix | PDF",1789221317]