[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-282582-105":53,"doc-detail-282582-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":120,"head_meta":122,"extra_data":124,"updated_unix":126},105,"en","clarin-contractual-framework-for-sharing-language-data-the-perspective-of-personal-data-protection","CLARIN contractual framework for sharing language data: the perspective of personal data protection","","The article analyzes responsibility for ensuring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in research settings, where academic freedom creates a complex environment for assigning GDPR roles. It addresses whether researchers themselves can be regarded as data controllers, considering court cases and existing policy documents. The study provides preliminary analytical grounding for redesigning the CLARIN contractual framework for sharing language data containing personal data.",{"@graph":63,"@context":119},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/clarin-contractual-framework-for-sharing-language-data-the-perspective-of-personal-data-protection/282582/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/clarin-contractual-framework-for-sharing-language-data-the-perspective-of-personal-data-protection/282582.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Ben ","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-16",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"Who is responsible for GDPR compliance in research settings?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"The article explains that, as a general rule, organizations are considered the data controller responsible for GDPR compliance. It then examines whether academics could also qualify as controllers in research contexts.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"Why is it difficult to identify obliged parties in research?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"Research is described as a unique setting shaped by academic freedom, which can provide researchers with more autonomy than other employees. This complicates determining whether institutions or individuals are responsible parties.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the paper relate to the CLARIN contractual framework?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"The analysis is used as preliminary background for redesigning CLARIN’s contractual framework for sharing data, extending prior conceptual work focused on personal data.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":121,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":123,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":125,"site_id":56},282582,1790011664,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":128},{"doc_id":125,"user_id":129,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":141,"read_time":76},2336478951081,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Published in: Navarretta, Costanza/Eskevich, Maria (Eds.): Proceedings of CLARIN Annual Conference 2020.  \n05 – 07 October 2020, Online Edition. -Utrecht: CLARIN, 2020. Pp. 171-177.  \n[https://office.clarin.eu/v/CE-2020-1738-CLARIN2020_ConferenceProceedings.pdf](https://office.clarin.eu/v/CE-2020-1738-CLARIN2020_ConferenceProceedings.pdf)  \nData Curation, Archives and Libraries 171  \nCLARIN contractual framework for sharing language data: the perspective of personal data protection  \nAleksei Kelli  \nUniversity of Tartu, Estonia  \n[aleksei.kelli@ut.ee](aleksei.kelli@ut.ee)  \nKrister Lindén  \nUniversity of Helsinki, Finland  \nkrister.linden@ [helsinki.fi](helsinki.fi)  \nKadri Vider  \nUniversity of Tartu, Estonia  \n[kadri.vider@ut.ee](kadri.vider@ut.ee)  \nPawel Kamocki  \nIDS Mannheim, Germany  \n[pawel.kamocki@gmail.com](pawel.kamocki@gmail.com)  \nArvi Tavast  \nInstitute of the Estonian Language, Estonia  \n[arvi@tavast.ee](arvi@tavast.ee)  \nRamūnas Birštonas  \nVilnius University, Lithuania  \nramunas.birstonas@ [tf.vu.lt](tf.vu.lt)  \nGaabriel Tavits  \nUniversity of Tartu, Estonia  \n[gaabriel.tavits@ut.ee](gaabriel.tavits@ut.ee)  \nMari Keskküla  \nUniversity of Tartu, Estonia  \n[mari.keskkula@gmail.com](mari.keskkula@gmail.com)  \nPenny Labropoulou  \nILSP/ARC, Greece [penny@ilsp.gr](penny@ilsp.gr)  \nAbstract  \nThe article analyses the responsibility for ensuring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in research settings. As a general rule, organisations are considered the data controller (responsible party for the GDPR compliance) . Research constitutes a unique setting influenced by academic freedom. This raises the question of whether academics could be considered the controller as well. However, there are some court cases and policy documents on this issue. It is not settled yet.  \nThe analysis serves a preliminary analytical background for redesigning CLARIN contractual framework for sharing data.  \n1 Introduction  \nThis paper focuses on sharing 1 language data (LD) containing personal data (PD) .2 A key issue here is to define obliged parties under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) . The GDPR identifies  \nThis work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Licence details: [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)  \n1 The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Art. 4 (2) defines processing extensively so that it covers any operation which is performed on personal data (e.g., collection, storage, alteration and sharing) .  \n2 The article does not address transfer of PD outside the EU. This topic concerns special provisions of the GDPR and EU case law (e.g. C‑311/18) .  \nProceedings CLARIN Annual Conference 2020  \nPublikationsserver des Leibniz-Institutsfür Deutsche Sprache URN: [http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-100814](http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-100814)  \nthe controller and the processor as responsible parties (Art. 4) .3 According to the accountability principle, the controller is responsible for the GDPR compliance (Art. 5 (2)) . The GDPR defines the controller as “the natural or legal person, public authority, agency or other body which, alone or jointly with others, determines the purposes and means of the processing of personal data”(Art. 4 (7)) . The processor is defined as “a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or other body which processes personal data on behalf of the controller”.4  \nThe authors place this question into the context of language research and address practical questions such as 1) how to differentiate between obligations of the university and individual researchers (e.g., whether an individual researcher is the controller) and; 2) whether sharing LD results in joint controllership or separate controllership (whether the transferee of the data becomes the controller, the joint controller or the processor) . The paper serves as a preliminary concep","cbCaijTyglmCukYu","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijTyglmCukYu","pdf",280650,7,"English","# Abstract\n# 1 Introduction\n# 2 Duty-bearers for the GDPR compliance within research settings","[{\"question\":\"Who is responsible for GDPR compliance in research settings?\",\"answer\":\"The article explains that, as a general rule, organizations are considered the data controller responsible for GDPR compliance. It then examines whether academics could also qualify as controllers in research contexts.\"},{\"question\":\"Why is it difficult to identify obliged parties in research?\",\"answer\":\"Research is described as a unique setting shaped by academic freedom, which can provide researchers with more autonomy than other employees. This complicates determining whether institutions or individuals are responsible parties.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the paper relate to the CLARIN contractual framework?\",\"answer\":\"The analysis is used as preliminary background for redesigning CLARIN’s contractual framework for sharing data, extending prior conceptual work focused on personal data.\"}]","CLARIN contractual framework for sharing language data: the perspective of personal data protection | PDF",1789577774]