[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-307331-105":53,"doc-detail-307331-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","cannabis-control-commission-public-meeting-minutes-november-6-2025","CANNABIS CONTROL COMMISSION - PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES - November 6, 2025","","Public meeting minutes of the Cannabis Control Commission dated November 6, 2025, detailing the call to order, recording notice, and agenda overview. The Commission discussed and voted on draft Social Consumption regulations, focusing on timeline structure for Social Consumption (e.g., preference for 36 months versus 60 months), start dates by license type, and real-time reporting updates. Attorneys and commissioners reviewed specific regulatory sections on event diagrams, host community agreements, municipal event counts, public safety briefing requirements, notice and submission of plans, and standardized forms, concluding with unanimous approval of a recess motion.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":51,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/cannabis-control-commission-public-meeting-minutes-november-6-2025/307331/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/cannabis-control-commission-public-meeting-minutes-november-6-2025/307331.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Mia  ","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-20","2026-09-19",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":9},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What topic dominated the Commission’s discussion during the meeting?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The Commission primarily discussed and reviewed proposed draft Social Consumption regulations and related policy questions, including how timelines and reporting would work.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How did the Commission address the timeline for Social Consumption regulations?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"The discussion compared 60 months versus 36 months for consistency with other social equity licenses, considered when the period would start, and formed consensus around 36 months with implementation steps for different license types.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What reporting schedule did the Commission agree to?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"The Commission reached consensus requiring reporting every six months for real-time updates.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},307331,1789848031,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":50,"category_name":51,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":9,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":125,"read_time":76},687207024478,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","CANNABIS CONTROL COMMISSION  \nNovember 6, 2025  \n10:00 AM  \nIn-Person at Cannabis Control Commission, Second Floor Public Meeting Room, Worcester Union Station, 2 Washington Square, Worcester and with Remote Access via  \nMicrosoft Teams Live*  \nPUBLIC MEETING MINUTES  \nDocuments:  \n•  Meeting Packet  \n• October 9, 2025, 935 Code Mass. Regs. § 500.00 Draft Social Consumption Regulations.  \nIn Attendance:  \n• Chair Shannon O’Brien  \n• Commissioner Kimberly Roy  \n• Commissioner Bruce Stebbins  \nMinutes:  \nI. Call to Order  \n• The Chair recognized a quorum and called the meeting to order.  \n• The Chair gave notice that the meeting is being recorded.  \n• The Chair gave an overview of the agenda.  \nII. Commissioners’ Comments & Updates – 00:01:09  \n• There were no comments or updates by Commissioners.  \nIII. Commission Discussion and Votes – 00:01:19  \n1. Discussion and Review of Draft Regulations and Policy Questions  \n• Associate General Counsel Erica Bruno (AGC Bruno) began the discussion of the proposed draft Social Consumption (SC) regulations, starting with material at 935 Code Mass. Regs. § 500.050(6)(g) . The Chair observed that instead of 60 months, the period could preferably be 36 months to be consistent with other social equity Licenses. Commissioner Stebbins explained the rationale behind 60 months with the example of people taking out home equity loans for financing. Commissioner Roy  \nconcurred with the Chair’s analysis citing how access and opportunity would be promoted. The Chair commented that unlike previous Licenses, exclusivity analysis would now be conducted in real time, and that the 36 months could always be extended in the future. The conversation shifted to when the time period would begin, either at the time of the first SC business opening or starting with the commencement of the third or fifth business. Executive Director Travis Ahern (ED) discussed some of the future steps once the SC regulations were passed, starting with budgeting issues and steps involving setting up the working groups for implementation. Consensus began forming around 36 months, with commence dates for each discrete License type. The Chair and the ED endorsed the necessity of real time data collection and review. Deputy General Counsel Michael Baker (DGC Baker) suggested that a timeframe be used for real time updates, and the Chair proposed 6-month interval updates. Consensus was reached on requiring reporting every six months. AGC Bruno directed attention to material on 935 Code Mass. Regs. § 500.050(6)(f)3 .e., requiring the number of events in each municipality for each year, and the notice and submission of plans requirements. The Chair compared the language favorably to existing Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission (ABCC) regulations, and Commissioner Stebbins offered one minor amendment to reflect the two-step approval from the Commission as well as the municipality. AGC Bruno directed attention to 935 Code Mass. Regs. § 500.050(6)(f)3 .f.5. and read the proposed amendments. The Chair requested clarity on how the public safety briefings would be conducted and Commissioner Roy expressed that it appeared that the briefings might not be mandated. AGC Bruno agreed that the language could be more specific to specify that briefings shall be conducted with law enforcement, fire, and emergency medical services and may be conducted jointly or individually but must involve all three. The ED pointed out that some flexibility is built in to allow for the differing needs of different municipalities. AGC Bruno reviewed specifics required for the briefings, such as the information presented and who received it. AGC Bruno summarized individual sections and Commissioner Roy offered an amendment to add “point of sale” to the site plan requirement language. Commissioners Roy and Stebbins proposed merging the event plan and the pre-event public safety report into one standard form, so public safety considerations are addressed in one place and ","cbCaiqrfrw8qSXZb","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqrfrw8qSXZb","pdf",1292633,7,"English","# Call to Order\n# Commissioners’ Comments & Updates\n# Commission Discussion and Votes\n## Discussion and Review of Draft Regulations and Policy Questions","[{\"question\":\"What topic dominated the Commission’s discussion during the meeting?\",\"answer\":\"The Commission primarily discussed and reviewed proposed draft Social Consumption regulations and related policy questions, including how timelines and reporting would work.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the Commission address the timeline for Social Consumption regulations?\",\"answer\":\"The discussion compared 60 months versus 36 months for consistency with other social equity licenses, considered when the period would start, and formed consensus around 36 months with implementation steps for different license types.\"},{\"question\":\"What reporting schedule did the Commission agree to?\",\"answer\":\"The Commission reached consensus requiring reporting every six months for real-time updates.\"}]","CANNABIS CONTROL COMMISSION - PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES - November 6, 2025 | PDF"]