[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-160915-105":53,"doc-detail-160915-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","briefing-outline-key-items-milestone-c-template","Briefing Outline - Key Items - Milestone C Template","","Template for structuring an Air Force program Milestone C briefing with a Bottom Line Up Front, purpose, and decision-focused agenda. Covers program description and overview, concept of operations, requirements and KPPs, affordability goals and drivers, acquisition strategy framing assumptions, test and evaluation, schedule assessment, funding, and program risk and mitigation. Includes portfolio perspective items such as product support quad chart, industrial base and manufacturing readiness, document status, exit criteria, recommendations for ADM, way ahead, and backup topics, plus international cooperation and program office resourcing inputs.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/briefing-outline-key-items-milestone-c-template/160915/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/briefing-outline-key-items-milestone-c-template/160915.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Terk","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation","2026-09-29","2026-08-30",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":47},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What is the purpose of the Milestone C briefing using this template?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"Present the way ahead for the program, discuss oversight and management planning, and state the specific decisions being requested such as approval of Milestone C and permission to proceed to downstream reviews and delegated authorities.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Which sections must be included to support requirements evaluation?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"The template calls for operational requirements and when they are approved, identification of key KPPs, checks on how the program baseline validates requirements, and description of operational capabilities and impacts across today and future missions.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the template guide affordability and cost analysis?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"It requires stating Milestone C affordability goals and APUC objectives/thresholds, identifying affordability drivers and lifecycle disconnects, explaining schedule drivers affecting affordability, and summarizing updated tradeoffs from any cost estimate or KPP changes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},160915,1788085124,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":47,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":125,"read_time":140},1099525198933,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Program Title\nAir Force Review  Board (AFRB) Date\nRank, Name\nOffice Symbol\nDate\nMilestone C Template\nFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRE-DECISIONAL\nSee Notes Page\nThis template is for guidance only\nand is not mandatory.\nExamples are for illustrative purposed only\nBriefing Outline – Key Items\nBottom Line Up Front (BLUF)\nProgram Description/Overview\nCONOPS\nRequirements\nAPB-KPPs\nMS C Affordability\nPortfolio Perspective\nAffordability Template\nProduct Support Quad Chart\nTest and Evaluation\nAcquisition Strategy—Framing Assumptions\nProposed Schedule and Schedule Assessment\nBusiness Strategy (Include Competitive Strategy)\nProduct ion Rate\nFunding\nProgram Risk and Risk Mitigation\nIndustrial Base & Manufacturing Readiness\nDocument Status\nExit Criteria\nRecommendations for ADM\nWay ahead\nBack-up\nInternational Cooperation, Program Office Resources, Technical and Systems Engineering Assessment, Test and Eval, FMS, Other (eg., open actions from prior ADMs, Congressional concerns/funding cuts)\n2\nBottom Line Up Front\nPurpose\nPresent Way Ahead for Program\nDiscuss oversight and management plan for Program\nDecisions you are requesting (examples)\nApproval Milestone C (or FRP or FDD) (if AF is MDA)\nApproval to proceed to OIPT and DAB (if OSD is MDA)\nApprove Applicable delegations/waivers\nList Outstanding Issues\nIssue 1--Integrated Test events\n4 flight tests remaining\nIssue 2—Production funding\nNeed FYxx Budget to begin LRIP – GAO report pending\n.\n3\nRequired Funding\nDescription\nAcquisition Strategy\nEvolutionary Acquisition\nSole Source Production contract for LRIP\nRaytheon Missile Systems, Tucson\nThe Boeing Company, St Louis\nLRIP-Fixed-Price Incentive Firm Target (FPI(F))\nProduction\nLots 1-3 -- FPI(F)\nLots 4-5 – Fixed-Price NTE w/ Economic Price Adjust\nSchedule\nAir Force TY$M\nCFY\nFY+1\nFY+2\nFY+3\nFY+4\nFY+5\nTotal\nAF RDT&E\n86.4\n79.2\n165.6\nFYxx PB RDTE\n126.5\n153.5\n162.4\n731.0\nAF Proc\n46.9\n84.4\n125.7\n125.7\n125.7\n508.4\nFYxx PB  Proc\n46.9\n84.4\n125.7\n120.0\n120.0\n497.0\nDoN TY$M\nDoN RDT&E\n16.5\n32.2\n48.1\n46.5\n46.5\n189.8\nFYxx PB RDTE\n43.7\n44.2\n74.9\n37.6\n37.6\n238.0\nDoN Proc\n10.3\n10.3\nFYxx PB Proc\n16.3\n16.3\nProgram Description/Overview\n4\nConcept of Operations\n5\nInterrelationships, Dependencies & Synchronization with Complementary Systems\nMission Planning\nPFPS\nJMPS\nAviation Platforms:\nKC-135\nKC-10\nAWACS\nH/MH-60\nCV-22\nMH-47\nMH-6\nCH-53\nA/OA-10\nLAIRCM\nGround Teams:\nGAWS\nSF\nSEAL\nSTS\nHC/MC-130 Recap\nNo known issues affecting inter-related programs\nResolvable interface issues affecting programs\nUnresolvable interface issues affecting programs\nSolid denotes current system\nDash denotes future system\nArrow to Recap denotes supports Recap\nArrow from Recap denotes Recap supports\nIndicates program are interdependent\nC-130J:\nAircraft Procurement\n& Block Upgrades\nBe sure to include CYBER links and infrastructure. Indicate any issues/cybersecurity risks introduced by program interconnection.\n6\nRequirements\nOperational Requirements\nWhen Approved (AOA, ICD/CDD/CPD, CONOPS)\nKey KPPs—fully identified and clearly stated?\nIncremental Requirements?\nHow does the program baseline compare to validate requirements\nOperational Capabilities/Impacts\nCapabilities / missions (today & future)\nRelationship to established roadmap(s) / architecture(s)\nFamily of Systems (FOS) / System of Systems (SOS) / Complementary Systems\nExample for E-10A:  MP-RTIP, Global Hawk, MP-CDL, Army CGS\nAFSPC/AFMC/CC Attestation Statement (See notes)\n(See Notes for SSRA/ESC)\n7\nWhy they matter. . .\nAPB Key Performance Parameters\n8\nAffordability\nMS C Affordability Goal:  ?\nMS C APB APUC Objective:  ?; APB Threshold:  ?\nEstimated APUC at ?\nTwo Affordability changes are drafted in the (Specify Milestone) ADM\nReflect the APUC Affordability Goal at ?% above APUC objective ($?)\nAre there Cost Affordability Drivers?\nIf so, please explain.\nAre there any disconnects throughout the lifecycle?\nHow will the disconnects be addressed?\nAre there any Schedule drivers impacting the Affordability Goal?\nIf so, please explain.\nAffordability Requiremen","cbCaidgeX0yuOtW0","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidgeX0yuOtW0","pptx",816707,38,"English","# Program Overview\n## Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)\n## Purpose and Decisions\n# Requirements and Affordability\n## Requirements\n## Affordability and Cost Capability Analysis\n# Acquisition and Execution\n## Acquisition Strategy—Framing Assumptions\n## Proposed Schedule and Schedule Assessment\n## Funding and Program Risk\n## Product Support Strategy\n# Program Status and Way Ahead\n## Document Status and Exit Criteria\n## Recommendations for ADM and Way Ahead\n## Back-up","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Milestone C briefing using this template?\",\"answer\":\"Present the way ahead for the program, discuss oversight and management planning, and state the specific decisions being requested such as approval of Milestone C and permission to proceed to downstream reviews and delegated authorities.\"},{\"question\":\"Which sections must be included to support requirements evaluation?\",\"answer\":\"The template calls for operational requirements and when they are approved, identification of key KPPs, checks on how the program baseline validates requirements, and description of operational capabilities and impacts across today and future missions.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the template guide affordability and cost analysis?\",\"answer\":\"It requires stating Milestone C affordability goals and APUC objectives/thresholds, identifying affordability drivers and lifecycle disconnects, explaining schedule drivers affecting affordability, and summarizing updated tradeoffs from any cost estimate or KPP changes.\"}]","Briefing Outline - Key Items - Milestone C Template | PPTX",13]