[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-564913-105":53,"doc-detail-564913-en":120},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":113,"head_meta":115,"extra_data":117,"updated_unix":119},105,"en","boris-mckinney-initial-brief-of-appellant","BORIS McKINNEY - INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT","","Initial Brief of Appellant in the Florida Supreme Court case involving Boris McKinney and the State of Florida. The document presents the procedural background of charges filed in 1987, defines terms used for the record and supplemental record, and lays out appellate issues challenging the fairness of trial proceedings. It argues ineffective assistance tied to counsel errors apparent in the record, evidentiary and instruction errors related to confessions and jury handling, and alleged shortcomings concerning kidnapping instructions and lesser-included offenses.",{"@graph":63,"@context":112},[64,80,95],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/boris-mckinney-initial-brief-of-appellant/564913/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"author":82,"headline":59,"publisher":85,"fileFormat":88,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":89,"datePublished":89,"encodingFormat":88,"isAccessibleForFree":90,"interactionStatistic":91},"DigitalDocument",{"name":83,"@type":84},"8796093062539","Person",{"url":68,"name":86,"@type":87},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-12",true,{"@type":92,"interactionType":93,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":94},"ViewAction",{"@type":96,"mainEntity":97},"FAQPage",[98,104,108],{"name":99,"@type":100,"acceptedAnswer":101},"Who are the parties in this appeal brief?","Question",{"text":102,"@type":103},"The appellant is Boris McKinney, and the appellee is the State of Florida.","Answer",{"name":105,"@type":100,"acceptedAnswer":106},"What record materials does the brief reference?",{"text":107,"@type":103},"“R” designates the Record on Appeal, including trial transcripts, and “SR” designates the Supplemental Record on Appeal, primarily covering the penalty hearing proceedings.",{"name":109,"@type":100,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What principal appellate arguments does the brief raise?",{"text":111,"@type":103},"The brief argues denial of a fair trial due to ineffective assistance, evidentiary and conviction-related errors involving confessions, fundamental error connected to an ex parte jury communication and related failure to act, and errors concerning jury instructions on kidnapping and lesser-included offenses.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":114,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":86,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":116,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":118,"site_id":56},564913,1791845032,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":121},{"doc_id":118,"user_id":122,"nickname":83,"user_avatar":60,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":123,"file_id":124,"file_url":125,"file_type":126,"file_size":127,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":128,"language":129,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":130,"faqs":131,"seo_title":132,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":119,"read_time":133},8796093062539,"IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA  \n74,867  \nCASE NO.  \nBORIS McKINNEY  \n●●●  \nAppellant,  \nVS.  \nTHE STATE OF FLORIDA  \nAppellee.  \nAPPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THEELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDAIN AND FOR DADE COUNTY  \nINITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT  \nWILLIAM A.CAIN  \nSpecial Assistant Public Defender1390 N.E.162nd Street  \nNorth Miami Beach,Florida 33162Telephone:(305)944-4858Fla Bar No.250260Counsel for Appellant  \n# TABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPAGE  \n# TABLE OF CITATIONSINTRODUCTION\n\niii  \n1  \nSTATEMENT OF THE CASESTATEMENT OF THE FACTSSUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENTARGUMENT  \n2  \n4  \nI.  \nDEFENDANT WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL GUARANTEED HIMBY THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE CON-STITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND BYARTICLE工，SECTION SIXTEEN OF THE FLORIDA CON-STITUTION BY INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF DEFENSECOUNSEL APPARENT ON THE FACE OF THE REOCRD.47  \nII.  \nTHE COURT ERRED WHEN IT ADMITTED TESTIMONY ABOUTTHE CONFESSIONS AS TO ALL CHARGES WITHOUT THECORPUS DELECTI HAVING FIRST BEEN ESTABLISHED ANDINSTRUCTING AND ENTERING JUDGMENT ON DUALCONVICTIONS.  \n63  \nIII.  \nTHE COURT COMMITTED FUNDAMENTAL ERROR WHEN ITDISCOVERED IT'S BAILIFF HAD AN EX PARTE COMMUNI-CATION WITH THE JURY ABOUT PREMEDITATED FIRSTDEGREE MURDER AND COMPOUNDED THAT ERROR WHEN ITFAILED ON IT'S OWN MOTION TO DECLARE A MISTRIAL,INTERROGATE THE JURY,OR GIVE A CAUTIONARY IN-STRUCTION EVEN THOUGH IT WAS OF THE OPINION THATEX PARTE COMMUNICATION CONFUSED THE JURY.78  \nIV.  \nTHE COURT ERRED WHEN AFTER IT GAVE AN INSTRUCTION,ON KIDNAPPING,IT FAILED TO INSTRUCT ON THE LESSERINCLUDED OFFENSE OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND DEMEANEDDEFENSE COUNSEL IN FRONT OF THE JURY.86  \n●●  \n# THE COURT's SENTENCE OF DEATH WAS INAPPROPRIATE ANDDISPROPORTIONATE IN THIS CASE.\n\n100  \n# CONCLUSIONCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE\n\n101  \n● ●●  \n# TABLE OF CITATIONS\n\nCASESPAGEBELL V.STATE,31l So.2d 179,181(Fla.lst DCA,1975)83BLANCO V.STATE,452 So.2d 520(Fla.1984)94BRADSHAW V.STATE,528 So.2d 473(Fla.lst DCA,1978)76CANNADY V.STATE,427 So.2d 723(Fla.198396CARAWAN V.STATE,515 So.2d 161(Fla.1987)74,75CLARK V.STATE,443 So.2d 973(Fla.1983)94CURTIS V.STATE,480 So.2d 1277(Fla.1985)84DRYSDALE V.STATE,  325 So.2d 80(Fla.4th DCA,1976)68FLA.645(F1a.4tnEDEORCEI986).DUKES,484 So.2a  \n71GORDON V.STATE,469 So.2d 795(Fla.4th DCA,1985rev.den.  480 So.2d 129660GORHAM V.STATE,  454 So.2d 556(Fla.1984)98HALL V.STATE,517 So.2d 678(Fla.1988)75HARDWICK V.STATE,461 So.2d 79(Fla.1984)97HARRISON V.STATE,483 So.2d 757(Fla.2nd DCA,1986)71HERRING V.STATE,446 So.2d 1049 (Fla.1984)97HERZOG V.STATE,439 So.2d 1372(Fla.1983)96HOLZAPFELV.STATE,120 So.2d 195(Fla.3d DCA,1960)81HUCKABY V.STATE,343 So.2d 29(Fla.1977)3HUNTER V.STATE,314 So.2d 174(Fla.4th DCA,1975)88IVORY V.STATE,351 So.2d 26(Fla.1977)83LLOYD V.STATE,524 So.2d 396(Fla.1988)97MAXWELL V.STATE,443 So.2d 967(Fla.1983)97  \n●●●  \nMCQUAY V.STATE,352 So.2d 1276(Fla.lst DCA,1977)82MCCRAY V.STATE,416 So.2d 804(fla.1982)96MILLS V.STATE,425 So.2d 172(Fla.1985)94PEAVY V.STATE,442 So.2d 200(Fla.1983)97PROFFITTV.STATE,510 So.2d 896(Fla.1987)93RHODES V.STATE,547 So.2d 1201(Fla.1989)85RILEY V.STATE,366 So.2d 19(Fla.1978)app.afterremand 413 So.2d l173,cert.den.103 S.Ct.317,459 U.s.981,74 L.Ed.2d 294,reh den.103 S.Ct.773,459 U.S.1138,74 L.Ed.2d 9853RUIZ V.STATE,388 So.2d 610(Fla.3d DCA,1980)rev.den.392 So.2d 1380(Fla.1981)71SANBORN V.STATE,513 So.2d 1380(Fla.3d DCA,1987)86SIMMONS v.STATE,541 So.2d 1212(Fla.3d DCA,1989)  \nrev.den.  548 So.2d 66380  \nSLINSKY V.STATE,232 So.2d 451(Fla.4th DCA,1970)84SMITH V.STATE,95 So.2d 525(Fla.1957)82STATE V.ALLEN,335 So.2d 823(Fla.1976)68STATE V.BING,514 So.2d 1101(Fla 1987)74STATE V.DIXON,283 So.2d l(Fla.1973)93STATE V.SANBORN,533 So.2d 1169(Fla.198886TEWART V.STATE,420 So.2d 862(Fla.1982)60STRICKLANDV.WASHINGTON,104 S.Ct.2052,80 L.Ed.2d61THOMAS V.STATE,348 So.2d 634(Fla.3d DCA,1977)71STONE V.STATE,378 So.2d 765(Fla.1980)71  \nWHITAKER v.STATE,433 So.2d 1352(Fla.3d DCA,1983)   6CWILKERSON V.STATE,510 So.2d 1253(Fla.lst DCA,1987)   87  \n!  \n●  \n●  \nWILLIAMS V.FL","cbCainuWR4CKdnbE","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainuWR4CKdnbE","pdf",4189275,107,"English","# Table of Contents\n# Table of Citations\n# Introduction\n# Statement of the Case\n# Statement of the Facts\n# Summary of the Argument\n# Argument\n## Defendant was denied a fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and Florida Constitution Article I, Section 16 by ineffective assistance of defense counsel\n## The court erred by admitting testimony about confessions without corpus delicti and instructing/entering judgment on dual convictions\n## The court committed fundamental error regarding ex parte communication with the jury and denial of mistrial/interrogation/cautionary instruction\n## The court erred after instructing on kidnapping by failing to instruct on false imprisonment and demeaning defense counsel in front of the jury\n# Court's sentence of death was inappropriate and disproportionate in this case\n# Conclusion\n# Certificate of Service","[{\"question\":\"Who are the parties in this appeal brief?\",\"answer\":\"The appellant is Boris McKinney, and the appellee is the State of Florida.\"},{\"question\":\"What record materials does the brief reference?\",\"answer\":\"“R” designates the Record on Appeal, including trial transcripts, and “SR” designates the Supplemental Record on Appeal, primarily covering the penalty hearing proceedings.\"},{\"question\":\"What principal appellate arguments does the brief raise?\",\"answer\":\"The brief argues denial of a fair trial due to ineffective assistance, evidentiary and conviction-related errors involving confessions, fundamental error connected to an ex parte jury communication and related failure to act, and errors concerning jury instructions on kidnapping and lesser-included offenses.\"}]","BORIS McKINNEY - INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT | PDF",37]