[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-282618-105":53,"doc-detail-282618-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","azul-amendment-to-settlement-agreement-legal-opinion-regarding-azul-amendment-to-settlement-agreement","Azul Amendment to Settlement Agreement - Legal Opinion Regarding Azul Amendment to Settlement Agreement","","Legal opinion issued by City Attorney Craig E. Leen regarding the Azul amendment to an existing settlement agreement. The opinion explains that the relocation of Azul and the city’s passport center outcome remains the same as under the original settlement, while the amendment benefits the City by reducing time and limiting the City’s legal obligations for the build-out. It notes that costs for Azul’s build-out and oversight may increase initially but the City’s ultimate expense is expected to be less, and the City Manager’s operational approval is referenced under the City Code.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/azul-amendment-to-settlement-agreement-legal-opinion-regarding-azul-amendment-to-settlement-agreement/282618/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/azul-amendment-to-settlement-agreement-legal-opinion-regarding-azul-amendment-to-settlement-agreement/282618.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Eden","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-26","2026-09-16",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":8},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What is the purpose of the Azul amendment discussed in the legal opinion?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"The amendment modifies the Azul settlement so the City benefits through reduced time and reduced City legal obligations regarding the build-out.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How does the opinion describe the relationship between the original Azul settlement and the new amendment?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"It states the ultimate outcome—relocation of Azul and the passport center for the City—remains the same under both the original settlement and the new amendment.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What approvals or legal authority does the opinion reference for approving the modification?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"It cites authorization under section 2-201(e)(6) of the City Code for the City Attorney to approve the modification, subject to City Manager operational approval, and notes issuance pursuant to sections 2-201(e)(1) and (8) of the City Code and section 2-584 of the Procurement Code.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},282618,1790184886,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":8,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":76},1374391974468,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","To:  Cynthia Birdsill,Leonard Roberts,Keith Kleiman  \n七  \nFrom:Craig E.Leen,City Attorney for the City of Coral Gables(  \n# RE:  Legal Opinion Regarding Azul Amendment to Settlement Agreement\n\nDate:June 5.2015                                \nThis matter originated as a settlement to avoid business loss and potential condemnation for Azul(“Azul Settlement\")relating to the prior settlement between the City and FPL(\"FPLSettlement”).The ultimate outcome of the present Azul Settlement (relocation of Azul;passportcenter for City)is the same under both the original Azul settlement and under the new Azulamendment,with the City benefitted by the Azul amendment as it will decrease time anddecrease the City's legal obligations(i.e.,the City will no longer have legal responsibility to dothe build out).Although the expense will go up,it is to cover the costs of Azul having to do thebuild out,and staff believes in good faith that the ultimate expense to the City will be less(Azulis also uniquely situated to oversee the build out,as they are in possession of the property).Inthese circumstances,I would normally opine that the original approval of the settlement andoutcome was sufficient,and the City Attorney could approve the modification to facilitate thesettlement (as long as the City Manager was fine with the amendment from an operationalperspective)pursuant to section 2-201(e)(6)of the City Code.Of course,it is always acceptableto bring the matter back to the Commission if staff prefers.I am issuing this opinion pursuant tosections 2-201(e)(1)and(8)of the City Code,and section 2-584 of the Procurement Code.es.  \nFrom:  \nSent:  \nTo:  \nCc:  \nSubject:  \nPlease publish this opinion.  \nCraig E.Leen,City AttorneyBoard Certified by the Florida Bar inCity,County and Local Government LawCity of Coral Gables405 Biltmore WayCoral Gables,Florida 33134Phone:(305)460-5218Fax:(305)460-5264Email:cleen@coralgables.com  \nCRAI GABLL.S  \n17  iA二!  \nFrom:Leen,Craig  \nSent:Friday,June 05,20156:00 PM  \nCraig E.Leen,City AttorneyBoard Certified by the Florida Bar inCity,County and Local Government Law  \nHerbello,Stephanie                             \nLeen,Craig  \nFriday,June 05,20156:20 PMHerbello,Stephanie  \nRamos,Miriam;Figueroa,Yaneris;Chen,BrigetteFW:Azul Amendment to Settlement Agreement  \nCclebruting 9vears of a dreant realizeid  \nTo:Birdsill,Cynthia;Roberts,Leonard;Kleiman,Keith  \nCc:Pounds,Michael;Gomez,Diana;Ramos,Miriam  \nSubject:RE:Azul Amendment to Settlement Agreement  \nThis matter originated as a settlement to avoid business loss and potential condemnation for Azul (“Azul Settlement”)relating to the prior settlement between the City and FPL(\"FPL Settlement\").The ultimate outcome of the present AzulSettlement(relocation of Azul;passport center for City)is the same under both the original Azul settlement and underthe new Azul amendment,with the City benefitted by the Azul amendment as it will decrease time and decrease theCity's legal obligations(i.e.,the City will no longer have legal responsibility to do the build out).Although the expensewill go up,it is to cover the costs of Azul having to do the build out,and staff believes in good faith that the ultimateexpense to the City will be less(Azul is also uniquely situated to oversee the build out,as they are in possession of theproperty).In these circumstances,I would normally opine that the original approval of the settlement and outcome wassufficient,and the City Attorney could approve the modification to facilitate the settlement(as long as the City Managerwas fine with the amendment from an operational perspective)pursuant to section 2-201(e)(6)of the City Code.Ofcourse,it is always acceptable to bring the matter back to the Commission if staff prefers.I am issuing this opinionpursuant to sections 2-201(e)(1)and (8)of the City Code,and section 2-584 of the Procurement Code.  \n(clebrating 901 ycurs of a drean reuliseul  \nFrom:Birdsill,Cynthia  \nSent:Friday,June 05,201510:13 AM  \nTo:Roberts,Leonard","cbCaiieNdWs8azT0","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiieNdWs8azT0","pdf",1227626,7,"English","# RE: Legal Opinion Regarding Azul Amendment to Settlement Agreement\n## Parties and recipients\n## Background and purpose of the amendment\n## Expected outcome and legal rationale\n## Issuance authority and relevant code sections\n## Publication instruction","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Azul amendment discussed in the legal opinion?\",\"answer\":\"The amendment modifies the Azul settlement so the City benefits through reduced time and reduced City legal obligations regarding the build-out.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the opinion describe the relationship between the original Azul settlement and the new amendment?\",\"answer\":\"It states the ultimate outcome—relocation of Azul and the passport center for the City—remains the same under both the original settlement and the new amendment.\"},{\"question\":\"What approvals or legal authority does the opinion reference for approving the modification?\",\"answer\":\"It cites authorization under section 2-201(e)(6) of the City Code for the City Attorney to approve the modification, subject to City Manager operational approval, and notes issuance pursuant to sections 2-201(e)(1) and (8) of the City Code and section 2-584 of the Procurement Code.\"}]","Azul Amendment to Settlement Agreement - Legal Opinion Regarding Azul Amendment to Settlement Agreement | PDF",1789578863]