[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-194863-105":53,"doc-detail-194863-en":118},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":111,"head_meta":113,"extra_data":115,"updated_unix":117},105,"en","artist-support-grant-guidelines-2025-application-rating-key-criteria","Artist Support Grant Guidelines 2025 - Application Rating Key & Criteria","","Artist Support Grant application rating guidelines for 2025 define how proposals are evaluated and how points map to eligibility outcomes. The rubric covers Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials (40% weighting) through three required components: essentials overview, artist statement, and proof of residency. Community Benefit (30% weighting) assesses diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility via intended project benefit, audience and/or partnerships, and DEIA efforts, using tiered rating definitions to determine eligible vs. not eligible funding.",{"@graph":63,"@context":110},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":41,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/letters/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/artist-support-grant-guidelines-2025-application-rating-key-criteria/194863/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/artist-support-grant-guidelines-2025-application-rating-key-criteria/194863.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Jordan Avery","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-08","2026-09-03",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":73},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What information supports scoring under Community Benefit (30% weighting)?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"Scoring considers DEIA-aligned community benefit, including the intended project benefit, an overview of audience and/or partnerships, and the artist’s DEIA efforts.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":112,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":114,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":116,"site_id":56},194863,1791429863,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":119},{"doc_id":116,"user_id":120,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":121,"doc_module":9,"category_id":40,"category_name":41,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":122,"file_id":123,"file_url":124,"file_type":125,"file_size":126,"view_count":73,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":25,"language":127,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":128,"faqs":129,"seo_title":130,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":131,"read_time":47},1099523882367,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","| Application Rating Key |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Rating | Rating Definition | Point Range | Percent Eligible |\n| Exemplary | Applicant provides overwhelming evidence of all three review criteria. Application is exemplary. | 90-100 | 100% of ask |\n| Strong | Applicant provides strong evidence of all three review criteria. Application is strong. | 69-89 | 100% of ask |\n| Good | Applicant provides sufficient evidence of all three review criteria. Application is good. | 48-68 | 100% of ask |\n| Fair | Applicant provides limited evidence of all three review criteria. Application needs work and is not eligible for funding. | 20-47 | Not Eligible |\n| Weak | Applicant provides little to no evidence of all three review criteria. Application is weak and not eligible for funding. | 0-19 | Not Eligible |\n\n\n| APPLICATION QUESTIONS AND RATING\u003Cbr>Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials (40% weighting)\u003Cbr>A culturally and artistically significant practice or work that contributes to the creative life of the artist and, ultimately, to St. Louis.\u003Cbr>The artist has provided (1) the essential information for their request, (2) an artist statement, and (3) proof of residency. |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Application Question |  | Review Criteria\u003Cbr>Artistic Essentials | Rating | Rating Definition | Point Range |\n| 1 | Essentials: Provide an overview of what you are requesting grant funds for. | • Includes clear plans such as location, dates, frequency (as applicable) (the who, what, when, where, and why) .\u003Cbr>• Proposed work contributes to the artist’s practice, skills, and craft.\u003Cbr>• Proposed work contributes to innovation and new thinking in theartform and wider culture.\u003Cbr>• Indicates how grant funds will be used. | Exemplary | Applicant provides overwhelming evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 14-16 pts |\n|  |  |  | Strong | Applicant provides strong evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 11-13 pts |\n|  |  |  | Good | Applicant provides sufficient evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 8-10 pts |\n|  |  |  | Fair | Applicant provides limited evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 4-7 pts |\n|  |  |  | Weak | Applicant provides little to no evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 0-3 pts |\n| 2 | Artist Statement: \u003Cbr>\u003Cbr>Upload\u003Cbr>You may choose to upload a 90 second video of your artist statement OR a one-page pdf. | • Artist statement demonstrates artistic significance and how the project is relevant to the artistic field and/or the arts & culture sector. | Exemplary | Applicant provides overwhelming evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 11-12 pts |\n|  |  |  | Strong | Applicant provides strong evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 8-10 pts |\n|  |  |  | Good | Applicant provides sufficient evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 5-7 pts |\n|  |  |  | Fair | Applicant provides limited evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 3-4 pts |\n\n\n|  |  |  | Weak | Applicant provides little to no evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 0-2 pts |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 3 | Proof of Residency: \u003Cbr>\u003Cbr>Upload\u003Cbr>Acceptable forms of proof of residency: voter registration, automobile registration, or income tax or property tax receipt | • The artist is a current resident of St. Louis City or County and has maintained primary residence in St. Louis City or County for at least one year\u003Cbr>• If the applicant is applying as a part of a collective or as a co-creative, each member of the collective/co-creative team is a current resident of St. Louis City or County and has maintained primary residence in St. Louis City or County for at least one year.\u003Cbr>• The application address and proof of residency address must match. | Exemplary | Applicant provides overwhelming evidence of Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials. | 11-12 pts |\n|  |  |  | Strong | Applicant provides strong evidence of Cultural a","cbCaitchtd9eHCqh","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaitchtd9eHCqh","pdf",716219,"English","# Application Rating Key\n## Rating tiers and eligibility\n# Application Questions and Rating\n## Cultural and/or Artistic Essentials (40% weighting)\n## Community Benefit (30% weighting)","[{\"question\":\"What information supports scoring under Community Benefit (30% weighting)?\",\"answer\":\"Scoring considers DEIA-aligned community benefit, including the intended project benefit, an overview of audience and/or partnerships, and the artist’s DEIA efforts.\"}]","Artist Support Grant Guidelines 2025 - Application Rating Key & Criteria | PDF",1788443418]