[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-197151-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":80,"doc-detail-197151-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","ar-vessels-trials-analysis","AR Vessels Trials Analysis","","This document presents an analysis of experimental trials related to augmented reality (AR) vessels, focusing on user feedback and system performance. The analysis comprises data from five distinct trials, visualized through bar charts that detail the percentage of responses related to specific issues. Prominently featured are \"Items resulting from battery use (carrying board, battery)\" and \"Items resulting from AR glasses specifications (cables, glass cover, combination use with glasses)\", alongside \"AR vessels were not visible (unstable, malfunctioning, defective)\" issues that emerged across different trials. Trial 1 shows a significant percentage of responses attributed to battery use, while Trial 2 highlights challenges related to AR glasses specifications and visibility issues. Trials 3, 4, and 5 present varying patterns of responses, with Trial 4 exceptionally demonstrating a high percentage of \"Good\" ratings, suggesting a successful iteration. The data also includes user satisfaction ratings across trials, categorized from \"Very poor\" to \"Very good,\" with \"Good\" and \"Very good\" ratings showing a trend of increasing acceptance and improved performance in later trials, particularly evident in Trial 4. The overall findings aim to inform further development and optimization of AR vessel systems by identifying key problem areas and highlighting successful configurations.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/","General",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/ar-vessels-trials-analysis/197151/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/ar-vessels-trials-analysis/197151.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Alex Sinclair","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-27","2026-09-03",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":33},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What were the main issues reported in AR vessel trials?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The primary issues reported in the AR vessel trials included items resulting from battery use, AR glasses specifications, and instances where the AR vessels were not visible due to instability, malfunctioning, or defects.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How did user satisfaction change across the trials?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"User satisfaction ratings, ranging from \"Very poor\" to \"Very good,\" showed improvement over the trials. Notably, Trial 4 received a significant percentage of \"Good\" ratings, indicating a positive shift in user perception and system performance.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"Which trial specifically showed a high percentage of 'Good' user ratings?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Trial 4 demonstrated a substantially high percentage of \"Good\" user ratings, suggesting that the configurations and improvements implemented for this trial were particularly effective.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},197151,1788465375,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,88,93,98,103,108,113,118,123],{"id":84,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":89,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":90,"show_sort_weight":91,"slug":92},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":94,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":99,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":104,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":105,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":107},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":109,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":110,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":114,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":115,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":119,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":124,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":125},158,"general-158",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":127},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":128,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":22,"category_id":124,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":11,"file_id":130,"file_url":131,"file_type":132,"file_size":133,"view_count":33,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":134,"language":135,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":79,"read_time":30},1099523882182,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","cbCaiqrzVImIJB6F","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqrzVImIJB6F","pdf",1225430,9,"English","# Trial 1\n## Items resulting from battery use (carrying board, battery)\n## Items resulting from AR glasses specifications (cables, glass cover, combination use with glasses)\n## AR vessels were not visible (unstable, malfunctioning, defective)\n# Trial 2\n# Trial 3\n# Trial 4\n# Trial 5\n# User Satisfaction Ratings","[{\"question\":\"What were the main issues reported in AR vessel trials?\",\"answer\":\"The primary issues reported in the AR vessel trials included items resulting from battery use, AR glasses specifications, and instances where the AR vessels were not visible due to instability, malfunctioning, or defects.\"},{\"question\":\"How did user satisfaction change across the trials?\",\"answer\":\"User satisfaction ratings, ranging from \\\"Very poor\\\" to \\\"Very good,\\\" showed improvement over the trials. Notably, Trial 4 received a significant percentage of \\\"Good\\\" ratings, indicating a positive shift in user perception and system performance.\"},{\"question\":\"Which trial specifically showed a high percentage of 'Good' user ratings?\",\"answer\":\"Trial 4 demonstrated a substantially high percentage of \\\"Good\\\" user ratings, suggesting that the configurations and improvements implemented for this trial were particularly effective.\"}]","AR Vessels Trials Analysis | PDF"]