[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-278057-105":53,"doc-detail-278057-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","appraisal-record-for-supplier-survey-location","Appraisal Record For Supplier Survey - Location","","Supplier survey appraisal record template used to evaluate a vendor’s management system, resource management, supplier management, incoming material control, product process control, and control/maintain system. Includes survey rounds, dates, team details, itemized scoring with remarks, and survey result categories ranging from acceptable to critical findings requiring suspension of certification. Provides overall review areas for QA/QC and MSS departments, plus completion guidance for checklist decisions, evidence documentation, and opportunities for improvement.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/appraisal-record-for-supplier-survey-location/278057/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/appraisal-record-for-supplier-survey-location/278057.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Miles","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/octet-stream","2026-10-27","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":30},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What survey rounds and basic information does the appraisal record include?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"It supports 1ST, 2ND, 3RD, and Others survey rounds, and includes fields for vendor/location, responsible person and title, survey number, survey date, and survey team.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"How are survey results classified for non-conformance severity?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Results range from Acceptable to Audit result acceptable with no findings, Minor findings requiring written reply with CAP and evidence within 2 weeks, Unsatisfactory requiring corrective action and possible re-audit, Major findings requiring CAP and follow-up audit within 3 months, and Critical findings leading to suspension of certification for 3 months.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What do the checklist compliance “Yes” and “No” decisions require?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"“Yes” indicates compliance is demonstrated, while “No” requires corrective actions. Evidence must be recorded in the “Findings” area to justify “Yes,” “No,” or “NA,” and improvement suggestions are written under “Opportunities for Improvement” at the end of each section.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},278057,1791527609,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":30,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":47,"language":135,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":139,"read_time":73},13056703019404,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","Appraisal Record For Supplier Survey\nRef. GVSR no\nVendor:\nLocation:\nResponsible Person and Title:\nNo. Of Survey:\n□1ST  □ 2ND   □3RD   □  Others:\nSurvey Date:\nSurvey Team:\nQP Survey Rating And Survey Team Comment\nItem\nSection\nScore\nRemark\nI\nManagement System\n2\nResource Management\n3\nSupplier Management\n4\nIncoming material control and verify\n5\nProduct process control\n6\nSystem control and maintain\nTotal\nSurvey Result\nTotal Number of Non-conformance_______\n□Acceptable\n□Audit result is acceptable with no findings\n□Minor findings - Needs written reply with CAP and evidence of documents support within 2 weeks\n□Unsatisfactory(supplier shall implement the requested corrective action and re-audit if necessary)\n□Major findings - Needs written reply with CAP and follow up audit within 3 months if necessary.\n□Critical findings - Suspension of certification for 3 months. Re-certification is allowed through passing the re-audit.\nOverall reviews：\nQA/QC Dept\nPrepared By/Date\nApproval By/Date\nMSS Dept\nPrepared By/Date\nApproval By/Date\nRemarks for completion of checklist / report\n1). “Yes” – Compliance is demonstrated.\n2). “No” – Corrective actions are required.\n3). Evidence shall be recorded in “Findings” in justifying “Yes”, “No” or “NA” decision.\n4). Suggestions shall be written in “Opportunities for Improvement” at the end of each section\n5). Score Scheme:\nDescription\nScore\nNot familiar with requirements, no documentation and no implementation\n0\nFamiliar with requirements with limited documentation and preliminary planning and implementation\n1\n0-\u003C60% Implementation, with some documentation\n2\n60-95% Implementation and with basic documentation\n3\nAnalysis of results and on-going continuous improvement can be demonstrated in key areas linked to customer satisfaction\n4\nThe factory demonstrates significant innovation in news way to show relevant results beyond the customer requirements and sets as industry benchmark.\n5\n\u000f\nAppraisal Check List\nCompliance\nRemark\n1.0\nManagement System\n1.1\nIs established Quality System and wrote Quality Manual and procedure according to ISO requirement?\n□Yes □No □NA\n1.2\nIs management system documented and keep the inspection record (incoming /in-process/ finished product) to tracked through?\n□Yes □No □NA\n1.3\nFor product safety standard (eg.ASTM/EN71/CONEGor any other similar requirements from customers, is there a procedure to ensure such standards/requirements are fully met?\n□Yes □No □NA\n1.4\nAre product safety standards and regulations collected? (Such as ASTM F963、EN 71、CONEG etc)？\n□Yes □No □NA\n1.5\nAre test reports and compliance letter completed and returned to QP?\n□Yes □No □NA\nOpportunities for Improvement\n2.0\nResource Management\nCompliance\nRemark\n2.1\nDoes vendor have the sufficient technical support to follow up our product quality requirement?\n□Yes □No □NA\n2.2\nIs the manufacturing and inspection equipment inspected or maintained quality？\n□Yes □No □NA\n2.3\nIs the personnel clear about the responsibility of quality to insure they are competent for the job?\n□Yes □No □NA\nOpportunities for Improvement\n3.0\nSupplier Management\nCompliance\nRemark\n3.1\nIs material and supplier evaluation mechanism established against product Safety Specification? And evaluation results for suppliers clearly recorded down?\n□Yes □No □NA\n3.2\nIs Safety Supplier List and Approval Vendor List( AVL) established?\n□Yes □No □NA\n3.3\nDoes request evidence from suppliers or conduct relevant testing on all relevant incoming materials to assure compliance of Safety Material requirements?\n□Yes □No □NA\nOpportunities for Improvement\n4.0\nIn-coming Material Control And Confirmation\nCompliance\nRemark\n4.1\nIs all material processed through incoming inspection and identified?\n□Yes □No □NA\n4.2\nIs the definition and control procedure on key material and product mechanism established against material/product safety Specification?\n□Yes □No □NA\n4.3\nAre test reports and compliance letter provided by sub-suppliers checked and verified?\n□Yes □No □NA\n4.4\nAny CAR requested an","cbCaitRlmo7H6ISA","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaitRlmo7H6ISA","doc",112640,"English","# Appraisal Record For Supplier Survey\n## Survey setup and overall scoring\n## Survey result classification and approval sections\n## Appraisal check list\n## Opportunities for improvement and score scheme","[{\"question\":\"What survey rounds and basic information does the appraisal record include?\",\"answer\":\"It supports 1ST, 2ND, 3RD, and Others survey rounds, and includes fields for vendor/location, responsible person and title, survey number, survey date, and survey team.\"},{\"question\":\"How are survey results classified for non-conformance severity?\",\"answer\":\"Results range from Acceptable to Audit result acceptable with no findings, Minor findings requiring written reply with CAP and evidence within 2 weeks, Unsatisfactory requiring corrective action and possible re-audit, Major findings requiring CAP and follow-up audit within 3 months, and Critical findings leading to suspension of certification for 3 months.\"},{\"question\":\"What do the checklist compliance “Yes” and “No” decisions require?\",\"answer\":\"“Yes” indicates compliance is demonstrated, while “No” requires corrective actions. Evidence must be recorded in the “Findings” area to justify “Yes,” “No,” or “NA,” and improvement suggestions are written under “Opportunities for Improvement” at the end of each section.\"}]","Appraisal Record For Supplier Survey - Location | DOC",1789506601]