[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-240503-105":53,"doc-detail-240503-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","appendix-3-key-risks-risk-register","Appendix 3 key risks - risk register","","A risk register capturing key uncertainties for the “DRP station approach” project, including likelihood, consequence, risk score, and mitigation measures. Risks cover governance and stakeholder decisions, schedule delivery pressure for a September 2020 deadline, project cost increases driven by complexity, and risks from external funding and public perception. Additional entries address planning consent, environmental/technical constraints such as utilities, scheme attractiveness, and capacity requirements, with assigned owners and ongoing action statuses.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/appendix-3-key-risks-risk-register/240503/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/appendix-3-key-risks-risk-register/240503.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Bill Black","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":25},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"What format does the risk register use to track each risk?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"Each risk is listed with a reference number, risk description, likelihood (probability), consequence (severity), risk score, mitigating action, mitigating action owner, timescale for completion, and current mitigation status.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Which types of risks are most emphasized in this register?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Schedule and delivery deadline risks, cost increases from project complexity, governance or stakeholder approval risks, planning consent and conditions risks, and external funding or public perception risks are repeatedly addressed.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How are mitigation actions planned and monitored?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"Mitigating actions are assigned to an owner, given a timescale for completion (including ongoing items), and tracked through a mitigation action status, such as ongoing, alongside updated likelihood and consequence ratings.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},240503,1791190931,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":25,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":140,"read_time":73},24189269381491,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/160000cf11732dd8392?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1788146458752108895","RISK REGISTER  \nProject: DRP station approach Project Sponsor: Richard Ball  \n\n|  |  |  | Risk rating before MA |  |  |  |  |  |  | Risk r |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Ref. No. | Risk Raised by | Risk Description | Likelihood (Probability) | Consequence (Severity) | Risk Score | Mitigating Action | Mitigating Action Owner | Timescale for MA completion | Mitigating Action Status | Likelihood (Probability) |\n| sa001 | Cabinet\u003Cbr>report | There is a risk that the council improperly rejects the project; the council will then be liable to refund the programme development fee, However, the council’s exposure to cost is limited to properly incurred costs of the approved programme development fee | 1 | 4 | 4 | The reputational cost of not providing the facility required by HCA will be mitigated through early discussion with HCA management\u003Cbr>The council will seek to minimise the negative impact on NMiTE by providing facilities elsewhere | RG | 05/01/2019 | Ongoing | 1 |\n| sa002 | Cabinet\u003Cbr>report | There is a risk that September 2020 deadline is not met and accommodation cannot be provided for academic year 2020 | 3 | 3 | 9 | The programme is tight and does not allow for any delays. The risk to the deadline is, therefore, real. Any delays, together with their impact must be communicated to stakeholders. A communications plan will be developed to help ensure that this happens.\u003Cbr>The construction contract will encourage the contractor to complete on time through an industry standard set of incentives and liquidated damages There will be a significant reputational risk to the council of late delivery. This will be mitigated by early communication and management of any issues. The council will assess and work with the contractor to mitigate the risks in the delivery programme | RE | 16/02/2019 | Ongoing | 2 |\n| sa003 | Cabinet\u003Cbr>report | The costs are higher than anticipated due to the complexity of the project | 2 | 4 | 8 | Any increase in the programme fee will have to be approved by the Cabinet member. Stage 1 has been completed and has provided a greater level of understanding of project costs | RG | 01/03/2019 | Ongoing | 1 |\n| sa007 | RE | There is a risk that the economics of any alternativce solution put forward as a result of the WW issue are not favourable / unaffordable | 2 | 3 | 6 | The economic model and financial case for the project will be assessed as part of the outline business case for any proposed solution. Economic viability will be a key criterion. This will be further examined in the full business case | RE | 16/02/2019 | Ongoing | 2 |\n| sa008 | RE | There is a risk that the final scheme is not attractive to external funders | 2 | 3 | 6 | This will be considered as part of the financial case of the proposed solution. The council retains the option of providing the funding via the Development partnership | RE | 20/12/2018 | Ongoing | 2 |\n| sa010 | RE | There is a risk that the scheme is not viewed favourably by the public | 2 | 3 | 6 | Explanation of the scheme and how it fits with HCA and NMiTE will form part of the communications plan. Architects working with Historic England and HC conservation to modify the scheme | RG | 23/01/2019 | Ongoing | 1 |\n\nCARE ACT_ Risk Log Risk Log v1.0  \nRISK REGISTER  \n\n| sa035 | Cabinet\u003Cbr>report | The Welsh Water sewer running under the site impacts the development | 3 | 3 | 9 | A technical solution to the sewer is being discussed with Welsh Water. While the solution is yet to be agreed, WW are aware of the importance and urgency of the project. | RE | 23/01/2019 | Ongoing | 1 |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| sa036 | Cabinet\u003Cbr>report | HCA may decide that they no longer require this scheme as part of their accommodation offer | 2 | 3 | 6 | The nominations agreement will be put in place before the construction contract is signed | RE | 10/12/2018 | Ongoing | 1 |\n| sa037 | Cabinet\u003Cbr>report | NMiTE ","cbCailJ1d7sQw3Jw","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailJ1d7sQw3Jw","pdf",81607,6,"English","# Risk Register\n## Key risks and mitigation actions\n## Risk ratings and status","[{\"question\":\"What format does the risk register use to track each risk?\",\"answer\":\"Each risk is listed with a reference number, risk description, likelihood (probability), consequence (severity), risk score, mitigating action, mitigating action owner, timescale for completion, and current mitigation status.\"},{\"question\":\"Which types of risks are most emphasized in this register?\",\"answer\":\"Schedule and delivery deadline risks, cost increases from project complexity, governance or stakeholder approval risks, planning consent and conditions risks, and external funding or public perception risks are repeatedly addressed.\"},{\"question\":\"How are mitigation actions planned and monitored?\",\"answer\":\"Mitigating actions are assigned to an owner, given a timescale for completion (including ongoing items), and tracked through a mitigation action status, such as ongoing, alongside updated likelihood and consequence ratings.\"}]","Appendix 3 key risks - risk register | PDF",1789162160]