[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-247874-105":53,"doc-detail-247874-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","annex-6-scoring-template-for-proposals","Annex 6 - Scoring template for proposals","","Scoring template for proposals detailing how all submissions are assessed against established sub-criteria in a rating matrix. Each criterion uses a 1–5 scale (very weak to very strong) with optional narrative comments in the table. Quality and Price are weighted separately, with maximum scores of 55 points for Quality and 25 points for Price. The Quality section covers consultant profile and team composition plus the overall technical approach, including methodology clarity, alignment with TOR objectives, workplan adequacy, and writing quality. Price evaluation uses a cost comparison formula and includes consultant daily fees and key cost categories.",{"@graph":63,"@context":123},[64,80,102],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":36,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/forms/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/annex-6-scoring-template-for-proposals/247874/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/annex-6-scoring-template-for-proposals/247874.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Aditya","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":101},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",13,{"@type":103,"mainEntity":104},"FAQPage",[105,111,115,119],{"name":106,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":108},"What rating scale is used for evaluating proposals?","Question",{"text":109,"@type":110},"Proposals are rated on a 1 to 5 scale: 1 = very weak, 2 = weak, 3 = neutral, 4 = strong, and 5 = very strong.","Answer",{"name":112,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":113},"How are Quality and Price scores weighted in the evaluation?",{"text":114,"@type":110},"Quality has a maximum of 55 points, while Price has a maximum of 25 points.",{"name":116,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What does the Price evaluation consider?",{"text":118,"@type":110},"Price is evaluated based on compliance to the tender form and the scoring of the tender form, including a maximum score of 25 points calculated using the candidate cost comparison formula.",{"name":120,"@type":107,"acceptedAnswer":121},"Which areas are assessed under Criterion 1: Quality?",{"text":122,"@type":110},"Quality assesses consultant profile and team composition, including expertise, sector and regional experience, and language capacity, plus the overall technical approach, including methodology clarity and alignment with TOR objectives, methodology quality, workplan and timeline adequacy, and proposal writing quality.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":125,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":56},247874,1789959623,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":9,"category_id":35,"category_name":36,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":101,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":76,"language":140,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":144,"read_time":9},962085564549,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","Annex 6 Scoring template for proposals  \nAll proposals will be rated on each of the established sub-criteria in the rating matrix. A rating will be provided on a scale from 1 to 5: 1 = very weak, 2 = weak, 3 = neutral, 4 = strong, 5 = very strong. In the rating table, extra space is provided for additional narrative explanation or comments on the rating, proposal, proponents, etc. The maximum scores of the two components Quality and Price are subsequently 55 points for quality and 25 points for price.  \n\n| CRITERION 1: QUALITY |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| COMPONENT 1 |  | CRITERIA | SUB-CRITERIA | MAX. GRADING |\n| 1 | Consultant\u003Cbr>profile and team composition | The extent to which the consultant(s)\u003Cbr>present(s) the\u003Cbr>required level of expertise and experience to fulfil the objectives of these TOR | Relevance of the expertise and the sector experience of the proposed consultant(s) | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Relevance of the regional, local, and field-level experience of the proposed consultant(s) | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Capcity to operate in and understand the required language(s) | 5 |\n| COMMENTS |  |  |  |  |\n| Combined Score for consultant profile and team composition |  |  |  |  |\n| COMPONENT 2 |  | CRITERIA | SUB-CRITERIA | MAX. GRADING |\n| 2 | Overall technical\u003Cbr>approach | The extent to which the consultant demonstratesa clear understanding\u003Cbr>of these ToRs, and the soundness of | Clarity of the methodological approach developed in the technical proposal and | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Appropriateness of the methodological approach to deliver on the objectives set out in section 3 of the ToR | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Quality of the proposed methodology, includingthe extent to which the methodology elaborates on prescriptions set out in section 5 of the ToR | 5 |\n\n\n|  |  | the\u003Cbr>methodology\u003Cbr>proposed to\u003Cbr>achieve the objectives listed out in these ToRs | Sampling design, method and size | 5 |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  |  |  | Quality of the overall proposal writing,\u003Cbr>argumentation, structure of the text and visuals | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Adequateness of the workplan and timeline | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Adequateness of the time allocation of the consultants | 5 |\n|  |  |  | For longer term assignments (e.g combined design of baseline + midline or endline): a proposed approach to ensure continuity of team members | 5 |\n| COMMENTS |  |  |  |  |\n| Combined Score for Overall technical approach |  |  |  |  |\n| COMBINED SCORE CRITERION 1 QUALITY |  |  |  |  |\n\nThe Criterion price will be evaluated on the basis of the following:  \n1. Compliance to the tender form.  \n2. Scoring the tender form:  \nScore of Candidate X = 25 * (Cost Candidate Least Exp / Cost Candidate X ) The maximum score is 25 points.  \n\n| CRITERION 2: PRICE |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| COMPONENT 1 |  | CRITERIA | SUB-CRITERIA | MAX. GRADING |\n| 3 | Price | Best price for the proposed level of quality and depth of the proposed deliverables | Daily fee per consultant. This later will be considered by assessors in regard to their seniority level and their place of residence (i.e. international vs local) | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Travel and transport expenses | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Cost per deliverable | 5 |\n|  |  |  | Contingency budget | 5 |\n\n\n|  |  |  | Overall budget | 5 |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| COMMENTS |  |  |  |  |\n| COMBINED SCORE CRITERION 2 PRICE |  |  |  |  |","cbCaidAqusYF40qt","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidAqusYF40qt","pdf",147320,"English","# Scoring approach\n## Rating scale and narrative comments\n## Maximum scores and weighting\n# CRITERION 1: QUALITY\n## COMPONENT 1: Consultant profile and team composition\n## COMPONENT 2: Overall technical approach\n# CRITERION 2: PRICE\n## COMPONENT 1: Price and cost evaluation criteria","[{\"question\":\"What rating scale is used for evaluating proposals?\",\"answer\":\"Proposals are rated on a 1 to 5 scale: 1 = very weak, 2 = weak, 3 = neutral, 4 = strong, and 5 = very strong.\"},{\"question\":\"How are Quality and Price scores weighted in the evaluation?\",\"answer\":\"Quality has a maximum of 55 points, while Price has a maximum of 25 points.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the Price evaluation consider?\",\"answer\":\"Price is evaluated based on compliance to the tender form and the scoring of the tender form, including a maximum score of 25 points calculated using the candidate cost comparison formula.\"},{\"question\":\"Which areas are assessed under Criterion 1: Quality?\",\"answer\":\"Quality assesses consultant profile and team composition, including expertise, sector and regional experience, and language capacity, plus the overall technical approach, including methodology clarity and alignment with TOR objectives, methodology quality, workplan and timeline adequacy, and proposal writing quality.\"}]","Annex 6 - Scoring template for proposals | PDF",1789243122]