[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":3,"doc-seo-241192-105":53,"doc-detail-241192-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,14,19,24,29,34,39,44,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":12,"slug":13},11,1,"Template","Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":15,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":16,"show_sort_weight":17,"slug":18},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":20,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":21,"show_sort_weight":22,"slug":23},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":25,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":26,"show_sort_weight":27,"slug":28},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":32,"slug":33},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":35,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":36,"show_sort_weight":37,"slug":38},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":40,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":41,"show_sort_weight":42,"slug":43},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":45,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":46,"show_sort_weight":47,"slug":48},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":50,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":119,"head_meta":121,"extra_data":123,"updated_unix":125},105,"en","agile-software-requirements-management-and-regulatory-compliance-a-practical-live-approach","Agile, software requirements management and regulatory compliance: a practical Live approach","","Agile methods improve project outcomes, yet traceability and regulatory noncompliance risk remain difficult when governance, requirements elicitation, and development practices must align. This paper explains a “Live approach” that combines Agile-Waterfall principles with just-in-time information from modern ALM solutions. It shows how adopting and refining Agile practices can reduce project failure risk, strengthen requirements traceability and testability, and increase efficiencies of regulatory compliance across the lifecycle.",{"@graph":63,"@context":118},[64,80,101],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,71,74,77],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":72,"name":10,"@type":70,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/",2,{"item":75,"name":11,"@type":70,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/",3,{"item":78,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":79},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/agile-software-requirements-management-and-regulatory-compliance-a-practical-live-approach/241192/",4,{"url":78,"name":59,"@type":81,"image":82,"author":87,"headline":59,"publisher":90,"fileFormat":93,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":94,"datePublished":95,"encodingFormat":93,"isAccessibleForFree":96,"interactionStatistic":97},"DigitalDocument",{"url":83,"@type":84,"width":85,"height":86},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/agile-software-requirements-management-and-regulatory-compliance-a-practical-live-approach/241192.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":88,"@type":89},"Logic","Person",{"url":68,"name":91,"@type":92},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-04","2026-09-12",true,{"@type":98,"interactionType":99,"userInteractionCount":40},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":100},"ViewAction",{"@type":102,"mainEntity":103},"FAQPage",[104,110,114],{"name":105,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":107},"How does the Live approach support information traceability from requirements elicitation onward?","Question",{"text":108,"@type":109},"It uses just-in-time data provided by modern ALM solutions to keep requirements connected through development, supporting traceability, testability, and governance from early elicitation onward.","Answer",{"name":111,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Why is regulatory compliance risk still a challenge with Agile?",{"text":113,"@type":109},"Agile can improve delivery and customer understanding, but aligning governance, requirements approvals, and standard compliance demands additional mechanisms to manage noncompliance risk effectively.",{"name":115,"@type":106,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What problem does the paper address by integrating Agile with ALM?",{"text":117,"@type":109},"It addresses tool and data fragmentation by using unified ALM platforms that continuously evolve with multiple processes, enabling better coordination between Agile practices and lifecycle governance.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":78,"og:type":120,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":91,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":122,"canonical":78},"index,follow",{"doc_id":124,"site_id":56},241192,1791715321,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":127},{"doc_id":124,"user_id":128,"nickname":88,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":9,"category_id":8,"category_name":11,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":40,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":45,"language":135,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":136,"faqs":137,"seo_title":138,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":139,"read_time":140},1099513958762,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/1000023916a998db790?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1784791008015729253","DIGITAL INDUSTRIES SOFTWARE  \nAgile, software requirements management and regulatory compliance: a practical Live approach  \nExecutive summary  \nAgile methods have proven their ability to improve project success rates, but there is still some pretty wild, yet-to-be explored territory. For example: how can you support information traceability from software requirements elicitation onward while managing risk of noncompliance to industry standards and regulatory mandates using Agile? This paper presents the Live approach and discusses how the adoption and refinement of Agile methods are able to significantly reduce risk of project failure and increase efficiencies of regulatory compliance.  \n[siemens.com/software](siemens.com/software)  \nContents  \nIntroduction ....................................................................3-4  \nValue propositions of Agile principles................................5  \nMost common Agile methods ............................................6  \nStaying Agile: is it possible? ...............................................7  \nThe agile conundrum: requirements and governance versus development ....................................................................... 8  \nSoftware development tools: state of the art ....................9  \nThe “bad old days”: disparate tools and data..........................9  \nToday’s state-of-the-art tools proposition ..............................9  \nThe new breed of ALM ....................................................... 10  \nIntegrating Agile with ALM .............................................. 11  \nThe Live approach ............................................................ 12  \nLive approach guidelines.................................................... 12  \nGuideline 1: Single ancestor ............................................... 12  \nGuideline 2: Single source.................................................. 12  \nGuideline 3: Single repository ............................................ 12  \nGuideline 4: Custom work item class specializations ............ 12  \nGuideline 5: Live features................................................... 13  \nGuideline 6: Exposure ........................................................ 13  \nLive levels ......................................................................... 14  \nLive information ................................................................ 15  \nInformation availability ................................................... 16  \nThe Live approach and Agile development ...................... 17  \nConclusion ....................................................................... 18  \nReferences ....................................................................... 19  \nSiemens Digital Industries Software 2  \n Introduction  \nAgile principles evolved to address the perceived limitations of Waterfall development – mainly that Waterfall does not show results until the end, engages stakeholders too late, and unnecessarily delays testing.  \nAgile as a software development approach has gone mainstream, because Agile is focused on keeping the customer happy and gaining a clear understanding of customers’ requirements.  \nThe traditional Waterfall model strengths can generally be characterized as plan-driven models of well-defined processes of planning; firm requirements, requirements traceability and testability, and clearly defined acceptance criteria are paramount. The strength of these methodologies lies in the comparability and repeatability that stem from standardized processes. Waterfall development is generally considered to bethe least risky development model, which makes it popular for large or long software development projects, particularly in industries with project or product exposure to risk of life, limb, or liberty monitored as such by government bodies.  \nBut the reality is that no organization is a purist following any single prescriptive methodology. Rather, we are “blenders,” mixing w","cbCaieoxHzCV8f64","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaieoxHzCV8f64","pdf",1287815,"English","# Introduction\n## Value propositions of Agile principles\n## Most common Agile methods\n## Staying Agile: is it possible?\n# The Live approach\n## Live approach guidelines\n## Live levels\n## Live information\n## Integrating Agile with ALM\n# Conclusion\n## References","[{\"question\":\"How does the Live approach support information traceability from requirements elicitation onward?\",\"answer\":\"It uses just-in-time data provided by modern ALM solutions to keep requirements connected through development, supporting traceability, testability, and governance from early elicitation onward.\"},{\"question\":\"Why is regulatory compliance risk still a challenge with Agile?\",\"answer\":\"Agile can improve delivery and customer understanding, but aligning governance, requirements approvals, and standard compliance demands additional mechanisms to manage noncompliance risk effectively.\"},{\"question\":\"What problem does the paper address by integrating Agile with ALM?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses tool and data fragmentation by using unified ALM platforms that continuously evolve with multiple processes, enabling better coordination between Agile practices and lifecycle governance.\"}]","Agile, software requirements management and regulatory compliance: a practical Live approach | PDF",1789171743,7]