[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-239795-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":81,"doc-detail-239795-en":127},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","a-frank-discussion-on-lessons-learned-from-adopting-and-applying-nasa-std-6030-for-spaceflight-systems-agenda-and-objectives","A Frank Discussion on Lessons Learned from Adopting and Applying NASA-STD-6030 for Spaceflight Systems - Agenda and Objectives","","This presentation presents lessons learned from adopting and applying NASA-STD-6030 for spaceflight additive manufacturing systems. It outlines how to tailor NASA-STD-6030 additive manufacturing requirements through the AMCP, describes generation of AMCPs for global, program-specific, and part-specific cases, and summarizes early adoption observations and common requirement-interpretation issues. It also provides a recommended programmatic AM workflow aligned to PDR/IDR/CDR phases, and highlights guidance needs around qualification, certification, and part classification decisions.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/presentations/","Presentations",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/a-frank-discussion-on-lessons-learned-from-adopting-and-applying-nasa-std-6030-for-spaceflight-systems-agenda-and-objectives/239795/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/a-frank-discussion-on-lessons-learned-from-adopting-and-applying-nasa-std-6030-for-spaceflight-systems-agenda-and-objectives/239795.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Maya Linwood","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What does tailoring an AMR mean in the context of NASA-STD-6030?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Tailoring is the process of revising a shall statement in a NASA-STD-6030 AMR so it is accepted by the reviewing authority.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How can an AMCP be generated for different scopes?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The AMCP generation can be categorized as global (enterprise level), program-specific (for a single program), or part-specific point solutions (one material and one AM component).",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How is the recommended AM workflow aligned to program design reviews?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The recommended AM workflow pairs AM review milestones with existing program reviews such as PDR, IDR, and CDR, and uses early requirement discussions to reduce compliance issues.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},239795,1791685387,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,93,98,103,108,113,118,123],{"id":85,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},11,90,"presentations",{"id":89,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":90,"show_sort_weight":91,"slug":92},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":94,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":99,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":104,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":105,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":107},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":109,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":110,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":114,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":115,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":119,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":124,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":126},158,"General","general-158",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":128},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":129,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":130,"doc_module":22,"category_id":85,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":131,"file_id":132,"file_url":133,"file_type":134,"file_size":135,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":136,"language":137,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":138,"faqs":139,"seo_title":140,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":141,"read_time":55},962084928432,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","National Aeronautics and Space Administration  \nA Frank Discussion on Lessons Learned from Adopting and Applying NASA-STD-6 0 3 0 for Spaceflight Systems  \nWA MS JUNE 2 0 2 6  \nTim Poe  \nAdditive Manufacturing Engineer NASA Marshall Space Flight Center EM42 Advanced Manufacturing Branch Materials & Processes Laboratory  \nTheresa Juarez, JPL-353M NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Materials and Process Group  \nApproved for Public Distribution – Distribution A 1  \nA Frank Discussion on Lessons Learned from Adopting and Applying NASA-STD  \nAgenda and Objectives 6030 for Spaceflight Systems  \nAgenda and Objectives  \n• Tailoring NASA-STD-6030 Additive Manufacturing Requirements (AMR)  \n• Additive Manufacturing Control Plan (AMCP) and Part Production Plan (PPP)  \n• Observations from early adopters of NASA-STD- 6030 and common issues with requirement interpretation  \n• Initial thoughts on qualification and certification of multi-laser and directed energy deposition (DED) systems not directly addressed in NASA-STD-6030  \n2  \nAdditive Manufacturing at NASA  \nA Frank Discussion on Lessons Learned from Adopting and Applying STD-6030 for Spaceflight Systems  \nNASA-  \n• Fully embraces advantages of AM…  \n• Cost/lead time/part count reduction  \n• New design and performance opportunities  \n• Rapid design-fail-fix cycles  \n• …while fully understanding the challenges  \n• Multi-laser systems  \n• Complex, opaque scan strategies  \n• “NASA is a user ofAM” means…  \n• NASA engineers utilizing AM processes to make hardware = NASA has the design authority  \n• NASA procuring a service, sub-system, or system from a commercial provider  \n• Design authority varies  \nCenters involved in AM  \nEnd goal → Safe and successful missions  \nAMCP Generation for Global vs Program vs Part Specific AMCPs  \nA Frank Discussion on Lessons Learned from Adopting and Applying NASA-STD- 6030 for Spaceflight Systems  \nAMCP Generation for Global vs Program vs Part Specific AMCPs  \nAMCP Generation can be broken into three (3) categories  \n• Global: Enterprise level AMCP covering all AM Materials and Process  \n• Program Specific: AMCP covers the use of AM Materials and Process for a single program only  \n• Part Specific (Point Solution): AMCP covers one (1) material and AM component only  \nNASA AM Qualification and Certification Subject Matter Experts (SME) are available to provide guidance's on AMCP generation,  note that does not mean an endorsement of the AMCP by NASA.  \n4  \nIntroduction to Tailoring an AMR  \nA Frank Discussion on Lessons Learned from Adopting and Applying STD-6030 for Spaceflight Systems  \nNASA-  \nIntroduction to Tailoring an AMR  \nWhat is Tailoring an AMR?  \n• Tailoring Definition: The process of revising a shall statement to a NASASTD-6030 AMR that is accepted by the reviewing authority.  \nHow to Start the Tailoring Process?  \n• Understand the project requirements and the maturity of the process you are planning to use  \n• May require gap assessment with part agnostic requirements (e.g. , process, post-process, maintenance)  \n• When does tailoring occur?  \n– Programmatic Tailoring  \n– Cognizant Engineering Organization (CEO) Tailoring  \n– Any tailoring should be finalized and/or approved within the timeframe of the first major programmatic design review  \nHow are tailored AMRs documented?  \n• The AMCP documents the as-tailored requirement with  \nrationale and implementation methods for each AMR listed in NASA-STD-6030.  \n• Note that NASA AM Certification SMEs have found that most mature aerospace AM programs can meet the intent of most NASA-STD-6030 AMRs as written without the need for tailoring  \nThe AMCP is the foundation of successful additive manufacturing implementation  \n5  \nRecommended Programmatic AM Workflow A Frank Discussion on Lessons Learned from Adopting and Applying NASA  \nSTD-6030 for Spaceflight Systems  \nRecommended Programmatic AM  \nWorkflow  \nDiscussion with AM engineers for build feasibility  \nPDR: Preliminary Design Review  \nIDR: Interim ","cbCaiuZsTnVARdv0","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuZsTnVARdv0","pdf",1209963,20,"English","# Agenda and Objectives\n## Tailoring NASA-STD-6030 Additive Manufacturing Requirements (AMR)\n## Additive Manufacturing Control Plan (AMCP) and Part Production Plan (PPP)\n## Observations from early adopters\n# Additive Manufacturing at NASA\n## Centers involved in AM\n## NASA qualification and certification SME guidance\n# Introduction to Tailoring an AMR\n## What is Tailoring an AMR\n## How to start the tailoring process\n## How tailored AMRs are documented\n# Recommended Programmatic AM Workflow\n## Review milestone mapping to AM activities\n# Tailoring opportunity\n## Example: Multi-Laser for witness testing","[{\"question\":\"What does tailoring an AMR mean in the context of NASA-STD-6030?\",\"answer\":\"Tailoring is the process of revising a shall statement in a NASA-STD-6030 AMR so it is accepted by the reviewing authority.\"},{\"question\":\"How can an AMCP be generated for different scopes?\",\"answer\":\"The AMCP generation can be categorized as global (enterprise level), program-specific (for a single program), or part-specific point solutions (one material and one AM component).\"},{\"question\":\"How is the recommended AM workflow aligned to program design reviews?\",\"answer\":\"The recommended AM workflow pairs AM review milestones with existing program reviews such as PDR, IDR, and CDR, and uses early requirement discussions to reduce compliance issues.\"}]","A Frank Discussion on Lessons Learned from Adopting and Applying NASA-STD-6030 for Spaceflight Systems - Agenda and Objectives | PDF",1789153014]