[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-262481-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-1-en-105":80,"doc-detail-262481-en":126},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","4b-asset-protection-monitoring-report-28","4b - Asset Protection Monitoring Report 2.8","","Asset Protection monitoring report for the period March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018, presented for Board policy governance under Executive Limitation 2.8. The CEO indicates the report will not be seeking Board acceptance, but requests feedback on an initial submission. The document outlines the policy being monitored, relevant compliance interpretations, and the evidence basis for partial compliance. It also describes insurance, risk management, maintenance, proactive financial planning, internal controls, liability protection, information security, and protection of public credibility.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/","Template",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/general/","General",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/template/4b-asset-protection-monitoring-report-28/262481/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/4b-asset-protection-monitoring-report-28/262481.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Quinn","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-20","2026-09-14",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":26},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What period does the Asset Protection monitoring report cover?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The report covers March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018, with the report dated Friday, March 30, 2018.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"What does Executive Limitation Policy 2.8 require the CEO not to do?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"The CEO must not allow corporate assets to be unprotected, inadequately maintained, or unnecessarily risked, including requirements covering insurance, risk management, maintenance, liability exposure, and protection of information and public credibility.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How does the document define compliance for Policy 2.8?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"It states partial compliance, with the board’s interpretation mapped to sub-policies (e.g., 2.8.1, 2.8.2, 2.8.3, 2.8.4 for unprotected), and notes that compliance with sub-policies constitutes compliance with 2.8.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},262481,1789362519,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,88,93,98,103,108,113,118,123],{"id":84,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},11,"Presentations",90,"presentations",{"id":89,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":90,"show_sort_weight":91,"slug":92},12,"Resumes",80,"resumes",{"id":94,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},14,"Invoices",70,"invoices",{"id":99,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},15,"Posters",60,"posters",{"id":104,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":105,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":107},16,"Social Media",50,"social-media",{"id":109,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":110,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},17,"Forms",40,"forms",{"id":114,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":115,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},18,"Letters",30,"letters",{"id":119,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},21,"Paper Templates",5,"papers-templates",{"id":124,"doc_module":22,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":125},158,"general-158",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":127},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":128,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":129,"doc_module":22,"category_id":124,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":130,"file_id":131,"file_url":132,"file_type":133,"file_size":134,"view_count":26,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":135,"language":136,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":137,"faqs":138,"seo_title":139,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":79,"read_time":140},962075114765,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Issue Brief: Monitoring Report 2.8 Asset Protection  \nMeeting: Board Date: April 19, 2018 Agenda Item \\#4b  \nRecommended Committee Action(s):  \n• That the Board receive the monitoring report for information and provide feedback.  \nIssue Summary:  \nThe CEO feels the report is incomplete and will not be seeking Board acceptance at this time. However, he would appreciate feedback on the initial report.  \nBackground:  \nMonitoring Reports are a key Policy Governance tool to assess organizational/CEO performance in achieving Ends (1 .0) within Executive Limitations (2 .0) . A Policy-Governance-consistent Monitoring Process is:  \n1. CEO sends Monitoring Report and survey link to all board members  \n2. All board members complete survey on acceptability of Monitoring Report, looking particularly for two things in the Monitoring Report:  \na. A reasonable interpretation of the policy  \nb. Evidence of compliance with the reasonable interpretation  \n3. Committee reviews survey results and develops recommendation to accept/not accept Monitoring Report  \n4. At Board meeting, board accepts Monitoring Report through majority vote (or if not acceptable, determines next steps)  \nImpacts of Recommended Action(s): Governance: perform key Policy Governance process  \nAttachments: Monitoring Report: 2.8 Asset Protection  \nAuthor: MC/SG/JM  \nApproved by: MC  \nReviewed by: MC  \nDate: April 9, 2018  \nthe AAATA  \n2.8 Asset Protection  \nMonitoring Report for the Period: March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018  \nDate of Report: Friday, March 30, 2018  \nBoard Survey due: NA  \nFinance Committee Review: Tuesday, April 10, 2018  \nBoard Meeting: Thursday, April 19, 2018  \nthe AAATA board;  \nIn accordance with the Board’s Policy Manual; I present the April Monitoring report on Executive Limitation Policy 2.8: Asset Protection. This report consists of internal report information from staff.  \nThough these policies were not all in affect during the previous year, I have assembled this report as if they were (where feasible) .  \nI certify that the information is true and complete.  \nMatt Carpenter, CEO  \nAnn Arbor Area Transportation Authority  \nPolicy being monitored:  \nPOLICY TITLE: ASSET PROTECTION  \n2.8 The CEO will not cause, allow or fail to address circumstances in which corporate assets are to be unprotected, inadequately maintained, or unnecessarily risked.  \nFurther, without limiting the scope of the foregoing by this enumeration, the CEO shall not:  \n2.8.1 Allow board members, staff, and the organization itself to be inadequately insured against theft, embezzlement, casualty, and liability losses.  \n2.8.2 Operate without ensuring appropriate risk management.  \nA. Subject property, plant, and equipment to improper wear and tear or insufficient maintenance.  \nB. Fail to proactively anticipate the financial requirements needed to maintain assets.  \nC. Operate without internal processes, procedures and systems that encourage informed decisions and would deter and prevent theft, fraud or malfeasance.  \n2.8.3 Unreasonably expose the organization, its Board or staff to claims of liability.  \n2.8.4 Allow intellectual property, information and files to be exposed to loss, significant damage or unauthorized access.  \n2.8.5 Endanger the organization's public image, credibility, or its ability to accomplish Ends by.  \n2.8.5.1 Operating the organization in a manner that jeopardizes grantor relationships.  \n2.8.5.2 Ignoring the social, environmental and economic implications of major decisions.  \n2.8.5.3 Allowing third-party advertising that violates stated agency guidelines for community standards  \n2.8.5.4 Hiring a former board member as an agency employee or supplier within one year of that member’s departure from the Board.  \n2.8.5.5 Hiring a sitting elected official or former elected official that has not been out of office for at least one year from any jurisdiction that appoints members to the AAATA Board.  \n2.8.5.6 Ignoring exploration for innovation or opportuniti","cbCaiuwmHCPp22VL","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuwmHCPp22VL","pdf",412773,20,"English","# Issue Summary\n## Background\n## Recommended Committee Action(s)\n## Monitoring Report Details\n## Policy Being Monitored: 2.8 Asset Protection\n## Compliance and Evidence\n## Executive Limitations Policy 2.8.1","[{\"question\":\"What period does the Asset Protection monitoring report cover?\",\"answer\":\"The report covers March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018, with the report dated Friday, March 30, 2018.\"},{\"question\":\"What does Executive Limitation Policy 2.8 require the CEO not to do?\",\"answer\":\"The CEO must not allow corporate assets to be unprotected, inadequately maintained, or unnecessarily risked, including requirements covering insurance, risk management, maintenance, liability exposure, and protection of information and public credibility.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the document define compliance for Policy 2.8?\",\"answer\":\"It states partial compliance, with the board’s interpretation mapped to sub-policies (e.g., 2.8.1, 2.8.2, 2.8.3, 2.8.4 for unprotected), and notes that compliance with sub-policies constitutes compliance with 2.8.\"}]","4b - Asset Protection Monitoring Report 2.8 | PDF",7]