[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-1-id-113":3,"doc-seo-235166-113":41,"doc-detail-235166-id":114},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,17,21,25,29,33,37],{"id":8,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":11,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":12},178,1,"Template","Faktur","faktur",{"id":14,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":16},192,"Formulir","formulir-192",{"id":18,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":19,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":20},180,"Media Sosial","media-sosial",{"id":22,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":23,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":24},179,"Poster","poster",{"id":26,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":27,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":28},176,"Presentasi","presentasi",{"id":30,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":32},177,"Resume","resume",{"id":34,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":36},182,"Surat","surat-a95d00d3aaf04f3b854ecf140f00d385",{"id":38,"doc_module":9,"doc_module_name":10,"category_name":39,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":40},183,"Umum","umum-07d1ff437201438088836b2b1ed3c90f",{"code":4,"msg":42,"data":43},"ok",{"site_id":44,"language":45,"slug":46,"title":47,"keywords":48,"description":49,"schema_data":50,"social_meta":107,"head_meta":109,"extra_data":111,"updated_unix":113},113,"id","comparative-cost-plan-analysis-using-sni-and-bow-volume-1-no-1-january-2017-case-study-kwarda-pramuka-lampung-building","ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN RENCANA ANGGARAN BIAYA BANGUNAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SNI DAN BOW - VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1 - Januari 2017 - Studi Kasus Rencana Anggaran Biaya Bangunan Gedung Kwarda Pramuka Lampung","","Analisis perbandingan rencana anggaran biaya bangunan (RAB) memeriksa penggunaan metode SNI dan BOW dalam perhitungan harga satuan pekerjaan. Penelitian menelaah ulang RAB gedung Kwarda Pramuka Lampung dengan menyamakan harga satuan upah, bahan, dan sewa alat pada tahun keluaran 2013 untuk wilayah Bandar Lampung. Hasil menunjukkan perbedaan pada hasil akhir maupun tiap sub-analisa pekerjaan. RAB metode SNI sebesar Rp 3.225.681.370,00, sedangkan metode BOW sebesar Rp 3.538.491.454,00, dengan selisih Rp 312.810.084,00 di mana BOW lebih besar.",{"@graph":51,"@context":106},[52,68,89],{"@type":53,"itemListElement":54},"BreadcrumbList",[55,59,62,65],{"item":56,"name":57,"@type":58,"position":9},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":60,"name":10,"@type":58,"position":61},"https://docshare.wps.com/id/template/",2,{"item":63,"name":39,"@type":58,"position":64},"https://docshare.wps.com/id/template/umum/",3,{"item":66,"name":47,"@type":58,"position":67},"https://docshare.wps.com/id/template/comparative-cost-plan-analysis-using-sni-and-bow-volume-1-no-1-january-2017-case-study-kwarda-pramuka-lampung-building/235166/",4,{"url":66,"name":47,"@type":69,"image":70,"author":75,"headline":47,"publisher":78,"fileFormat":81,"inLanguage":45,"description":49,"dateModified":82,"datePublished":83,"encodingFormat":81,"isAccessibleForFree":84,"interactionStatistic":85},"DigitalDocument",{"url":71,"@type":72,"width":73,"height":74},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/comparative-cost-plan-analysis-using-sni-and-bow-volume-1-no-1-january-2017-case-study-kwarda-pramuka-lampung-building/235166.png","ImageObject",442,249,{"name":76,"@type":77},"Mabel","Person",{"url":56,"name":79,"@type":80},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-21","2026-09-11",true,{"@type":86,"interactionType":87,"userInteractionCount":9},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":88},"ViewAction",{"@type":90,"mainEntity":91},"FAQPage",[92,98,102],{"name":93,"@type":94,"acceptedAnswer":95},"Apa tujuan penelitian ini?","Question",{"text":96,"@type":97},"Menganalisis dan membandingkan rencana anggaran biaya bangunan gedung Kwarda Pramuka Lampung menggunakan metode SNI dan BOW dengan perhitungan ulang harga satuan pekerjaan yang sama.","Answer",{"name":99,"@type":94,"acceptedAnswer":100},"Apa dasar perbandingan metode SNI dan BOW yang digunakan?",{"text":101,"@type":97},"Perbandingan dilakukan dengan menghitung ulang harga satuan upah, bahan, dan sewa alat pada tahun keluaran 2013 untuk wilayah Bandar Lampung.",{"name":103,"@type":94,"acceptedAnswer":104},"Berapa selisih hasil RAB antara metode BOW dan SNI?",{"text":105,"@type":97},"RAB metode SNI sebesar Rp 3.225.681.370,00 dan metode BOW sebesar Rp 3.538.491.454,00, sehingga selisihnya Rp 312.810.084,00 dengan BOW lebih besar.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":66,"og:type":108,"og:title":47,"og:site_name":79,"og:description":49},"article",{"robots":110,"canonical":66},"index,follow",{"doc_id":112,"site_id":44},235166,1790034495,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":115},{"doc_id":112,"user_id":116,"nickname":76,"user_avatar":117,"doc_module":9,"category_id":38,"category_name":39,"doc_title":47,"doc_description":49,"doc_content":118,"file_id":119,"file_url":120,"file_type":121,"file_size":122,"view_count":9,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":9,"is_downloadable":9,"audit_status":9,"page_count":123,"language":124,"language_code":45,"site_id":44,"html_lang":45,"table_of_contents":125,"faqs":126,"seo_title":127,"seo_description":49,"update_tm":128,"read_time":61},7971474920318,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/74000ee537e6b0ca360?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1788430171632181674","VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, JANUARI 2017  \nANALISIS PERBANDINGAN RENCANA ANGGARAN BIAYA BANGUNAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SNI DAN BOW (STUDI KASUS : RENCANA ANGGARAN BIAYA BANGUNAN GEDUNG KWARDA PRAMUKA LAMPUNG )  \nYan Juansyah, Devi Oktarina, M. Zulfiqar  \nProgram Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Malahayati  \nJl. Pramuka No. 27 Kemiling, Bandar Lampung, Telp/Fax. (0721) 271112 –(0721) 271119  \ne-mail :  \n[juansyah1@yahoo.com](juansyah1@yahoo.com), [oktarina_sipil@yahoo.co.id](oktarina_sipil@yahoo.co.id), [m.zul69@gmail.com](m.zul69@gmail.com)  \nABSTRAK  \nDalam hal perkiraan rencana anggaran biaya bangunan (RAB), di Indonesia menggunakan analisa satuan harga dan upah yang berpedoman pada metode BOW (Burgeslijke Openbare Werken) dan SNI (Standar Nasional Indonesia) yang mana metode SNI adalah penyesuaian dan pembaharuan dari analisa BOW yang merupakananalisa peninggalan Pemerintahan Belanda yang berisi sistem pekerjaan padat karya dan konvesional. Akan tetapi kenyataan dilapangan metode BOW masih banyak digunakan untuk pekerjaan kontruksi bangunan karena angka koefisien yang dipakai lebih besar dibandingkan dengan menggunakan metode SNI sehingga memungkinkanuntuk mendapat laba yang lebih besar. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menganalisa rencana anggaran biaya bangunan gedung (RAB) Kwarda Pramuka Lampung dengan menghitung ulang harga satuan pekerjaan menggunakan metode SNI dan BOWdengan harga satuan upah, bahan, dan sewa alat yang sama tahun keluaran 2013 untuk wilayah Bandar Lampung. Sehingga hasil rencana anggaran biaya bangunan dari kedua metode tersebut dapat di bandingkan apakah terdapat selisih atau tidaknya. Hasil yang didapat dari analisa yang dilakukan pada Gedung Kwarda Pramuka Lampung adanya perbedaan hasil akhir maupun tiap sub analisa pekerjaan darikedua metode. Rencana anggaran biaya bangunan (RAB) gedung Kwarda Pramuka Lampung dengan menggunakan metode SNI adalah Rp 3.225.681.370,00 sementara dengan menggunakan metode BOW adalah Rp 3.538.491.454,00 . Sehingga didapat selisih Rp 312.810.084,00 dengan metode BOW lebih besar dibandingkan dengan metode SNI.  \nKata Kunci : RAB, SNI, BOW  \nABSTRACT  \nComparative Analysis Of Cost Plan Of The Building Using SNI And BOW (Case Study : Cost Plan Of The Building Kwarda Pramuka Lampung). In terms of the estimated cost plan of the building (RAB) , in Indonesia using the analysis unit prices and wages are guided by the method BOW (Burgeslijke Openbare Werken) and ISN (Indonesian National Standard) which method SNI is the adjustment and renewal of the analysis BOW that an analysis Netherlands Government relic containing systems and conventional labor-intensive job . But the fact the field BOW method is still widely used for building construction work because the numbers used coefficient greater than using ISN making it possible to obtain greater profits. Therefore, this study was conducted by analyzing cost plan of the building (RAB) Kwarda Pramuka Lampung by recalculating unit price used ISN and BOW method with the unit price of wages, materials, dan equipment rental output the same year 2013 in the region Bandar Lampung. So that the cost plan of the building of the two method can be compared whether thereis a difference or not. The results of the analysis carried out on the building Kwarda Pramuka Lampung differences and the final result of each sub-analysis of the work of both methods . Building cost plan of the building (RAB) Kwarda Pramuka Lampung using SNI is Rp 3,225,681,370.00 while using BOW is Rp 3,538,491,454.00 . Thus obtained difference of Rp 312,810,084.00 with BOW method is greater than the SNI method.  \nKeywords : RAB, ISN, BOW  \n1. LATAR BELAKANG dengan yang direncanakan. Rancangan anggaran  \nRancangan anggaran biaya (RAB) bangunan biaya bangunan sangat diperlukan mengingat sangat  \nialah suatu cara untuk menghitung biaya-biaya yang besar dan luasnya bangunan yang harus di hitung  \nakan diperlukan dari suatu bangunan dan dengan pembiayaannya dengan sangat teliti","cbCaijDSMNj5Y0qZ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijDSMNj5Y0qZ","pdf",90420,5,"Indonesian","# Latar Belakang\n## Faktor Teknis dan Non-Teknis\n## Analisa BOW dan Keterbatasannya\n## Pengembangan Analisa BOW menjadi SNI","[{\"question\":\"Apa tujuan penelitian ini?\",\"answer\":\"Menganalisis dan membandingkan rencana anggaran biaya bangunan gedung Kwarda Pramuka Lampung menggunakan metode SNI dan BOW dengan perhitungan ulang harga satuan pekerjaan yang sama.\"},{\"question\":\"Apa dasar perbandingan metode SNI dan BOW yang digunakan?\",\"answer\":\"Perbandingan dilakukan dengan menghitung ulang harga satuan upah, bahan, dan sewa alat pada tahun keluaran 2013 untuk wilayah Bandar Lampung.\"},{\"question\":\"Berapa selisih hasil RAB antara metode BOW dan SNI?\",\"answer\":\"RAB metode SNI sebesar Rp 3.225.681.370,00 dan metode BOW sebesar Rp 3.538.491.454,00, sehingga selisihnya Rp 312.810.084,00 dengan BOW lebih besar.\"}]","ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN RENCANA ANGGARAN BIAYA BANGUNAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SNI DAN BOW - VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1 - Januari 2017 - Studi Kasus Rencana Anggaran Biaya Bangunan Gedung Kwarda Pramuka Lampung | PDF",1789095509]