[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-id-113":3,"doc-seo-227333-113":53,"doc-detail-227333-id":128},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,17,21,25,29,33,37,41,45,49],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},55,"Document","Agama & Spiritualitas",60,"religion-spirituality",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":16},48,"Cerita & Novel","story-novel",{"id":18,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":19,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":20},56,"Gaya Hidup","lifestyle",{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":23,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":24},51,"Komik","comic",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":27,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":28},53,"Layanan Kesehatan","healthcare",{"id":30,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":32},54,"Penelitian & Laporan","research-report",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":36},49,"Sastra","literature",{"id":38,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":39,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":40},52,"Teknologi","technology",{"id":42,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":43,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":44},50,"Ujian","exam",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":47,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":48},57,"Umum","general",{"id":50,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":51,"show_sort_weight":4,"slug":52},181,"Formulir","formulir",{"code":4,"msg":54,"data":55},"ok",{"site_id":56,"language":57,"slug":58,"title":59,"keywords":60,"description":61,"schema_data":62,"social_meta":121,"head_meta":123,"extra_data":125,"updated_unix":127},113,"id","comparison-of-maut-and-profile-matching-methods-on-decision-support-system-for-paskibraka-candidate-selection","Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan Profile Matching Terhadap Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Paskibraka","","Seleksi calon Pasukan Pengibar Bendera Pusaka (Paskibraka) menuntut sistem penilaian yang objektif, transparan, dan konsisten. Penelitian ini membandingkan metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Profile Matching (PM) dalam mendukung pengambilan keputusan seleksi berbasis kriteria fisik, intelegensi umum, kepribadian, keterampilan baris-berbaris, serta kesamaptaan jasmani. MAUT menghasilkan skor utilitas melalui bobot tiap kriteria, sedangkan PM menilai kesesuaian terhadap profil ideal melalui analisis GAP dengan kelompok Core Factor (CF) dan Secondary Factor (SF). Hasil menunjukkan konsistensi peringkat untuk kandidat unggul, serta perbedaan pada peringkat menengah akibat perbedaan prinsip penilaian.",{"@graph":63,"@context":120},[64,81,103],{"@type":65,"itemListElement":66},"BreadcrumbList",[67,72,75,78],{"item":68,"name":69,"@type":70,"position":71},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":73,"name":9,"@type":70,"position":74},"https://docshare.wps.com/id/document/",2,{"item":76,"name":31,"@type":70,"position":77},"https://docshare.wps.com/id/document/penelitian-laporan/",3,{"item":79,"name":59,"@type":70,"position":80},"https://docshare.wps.com/id/document/comparison-of-maut-and-profile-matching-methods-on-decision-support-system-for-paskibraka-candidate-selection/227333/",4,{"url":79,"name":59,"@type":82,"image":83,"author":88,"headline":59,"publisher":91,"fileFormat":94,"inLanguage":57,"description":61,"dateModified":95,"datePublished":96,"encodingFormat":94,"isAccessibleForFree":97,"interactionStatistic":98},"DigitalDocument",{"url":84,"@type":85,"width":86,"height":87},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/comparison-of-maut-and-profile-matching-methods-on-decision-support-system-for-paskibraka-candidate-selection/227333.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":89,"@type":90},"Maya Linwood","Person",{"url":68,"name":92,"@type":93},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-03","2026-09-10",true,{"@type":99,"interactionType":100,"userInteractionCount":102},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":101},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":104,"mainEntity":105},"FAQPage",[106,112,116],{"name":107,"@type":108,"acceptedAnswer":109},"Apa tujuan penelitian ini dalam seleksi calon Paskibraka?","Question",{"text":110,"@type":111},"Membandingkan keakuratan metode MAUT dan Profile Matching dalam sistem pendukung keputusan seleksi calon Paskibraka.","Answer",{"name":113,"@type":108,"acceptedAnswer":114},"Bagaimana cara kerja metode MAUT dalam pengambilan keputusan seleksi?",{"text":115,"@type":111},"MAUT menghitung skor utilitas dengan mempertimbangkan bobot masing-masing kriteria penilaian.",{"name":117,"@type":108,"acceptedAnswer":118},"Apa perbedaan utama prinsip penilaian antara MAUT dan Profile Matching?",{"text":119,"@type":111},"MAUT menekankan distribusi skor yang merata pada seluruh kriteria, sedangkan Profile Matching berfokus pada kesesuaian dengan profil ideal terutama pada kriteria inti (CF).","https://schema.org",{"og:url":79,"og:type":122,"og:title":59,"og:site_name":92,"og:description":61},"article",{"robots":124,"canonical":79},"index,follow",{"doc_id":126,"site_id":56},227333,1789007019,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":129},{"doc_id":126,"user_id":130,"nickname":89,"user_avatar":131,"doc_module":4,"category_id":30,"category_name":31,"doc_title":59,"doc_description":61,"doc_content":132,"file_id":133,"file_url":134,"file_type":135,"file_size":136,"view_count":102,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":71,"is_downloadable":71,"audit_status":71,"page_count":137,"language":138,"language_code":57,"site_id":56,"html_lang":57,"table_of_contents":139,"faqs":140,"seo_title":141,"seo_description":61,"update_tm":127,"read_time":142},962084928432,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan Profile Matching Terhadap Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Paskibraka  \nRizthy Shavna Azizah1,*, Wafiah Murniati1, Mardi Mardi 2  \n1 Program Studi Teknik Informatika, STMIK Lombok, Praya, Indonesia  \n2 Program Studi Sistem Informasi, STMIK Lombok, Praya, Indonesia  \nEmail:1*[ri.rizthyy12@gmail.com](ri.rizthyy12@gmail.com), [2](2 wafiah.mr@gmail.com)[ wafiah.mr@gmail.com](2 wafiah.mr@gmail.com), [3](3 mardisambelia@gmail.com)[ mardisambelia@gmail.com](3 mardisambelia@gmail.com)  \nEmail Penulis Korespondensi: [ri.rizthyy12@gmail.com](ri.rizthyy12@gmail.com)  \nAbstrak−Seleksi calon Pasukan Pengibar Bendera Pusaka (Paskibraka) memerlukan sistem penilaian objektif, transparan, dankonsisten berdasarkan kriteria fisik, intelegensi umum, kepribadian, keterampilan baris-berbaris, dan kesamaptaanjasmani. Penelitian ini membandingkan metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Profile Matching (PM) dalam mendukung pengambilan keputusan seleksi. Metode MAUT menghasilkan skor utilitas dengan mempertimbangkan bobot setiap kriteria, sedangkan PM menilai tingkat kesesuaian terhadap profil ideal melalui analisis GAP yang dikelompokkan menjadi Core Factor (CF) dan Secondary Factor (SF) . Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan keakuratan metode MAUT dan Profile Matching dalam sistem pendukung keputusan seleksi calon Paskibraka. Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan kandidat A3 memperoleh skor tertinggi pada keduametode (MAUT = 0,970; PM = 3,600), diikuti oleh A1 (MAUT = 0,957; PM = 3,500) dan A9 (MAUT = 0,918; PM = 3,450) . Konsistensi ini mengindikasikan konvergensi penilaian terhadap kandidat berperforma unggul. Namun, perbedaan muncul padaperingkat menengah, misalnya A2 yang berada di peringkat 8 dengan MAUT (0,856) tetapi naik ke peringkat 4 pada PM (3,100). Perbedaan prinsip penilaian menjadi faktor utama: MAUT menekankan distribusi skor merata pada seluruh kriteria, sedangkan PM lebih fokus pada kesesuaian terhadap profil ideal khususnya pada kriteria inti (CF). Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa pemilihan metodesebaiknya disesuaikan dengan prioritas seleksi, atau digunakan secara kombinatif untuk memperoleh hasil yang lebih akurat dan objektif.  \nKata Kunci: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan; MAUT; Profile Matching; Seleksi Paskibraka; Perbandingan Metode  \nAbstract−The selection of candidates for the Flag Raising Troop (Paskibraka) requires an objective, transparent, and consistent assessment system based on physical criteria, general intelligence, personality, marching skills, and physical fitness. This study compares the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and Profile Matching (PM) methods in supporting selection decision making. The MAUT method produces a utility score by considering the weight of each criterion, while PM assesses the level of conformity to the ideal profile through GAP analysis grouped into Core Factor (CF) and Secondary Factor (SF) . The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the MAUT and Profile Matching methods in the decision support system for Paskibraka candidate selection. The calculation results show that candidate A3 obtained the highest score in both methods (MAUT = 0.970; PM = 3.600), followed by A1 (MAUT = 0.957; PM = 3.500) and A9 (MAUT = 0.918; PM = 3.450) . This consistency indicates a convergence in the assessment of high-performing candidates. However, differences emerge in the middle ranks, for example, A2, which ranked 8th on the MAUT (0.856) but rose to 4th on the PM (3.100) . Differences in assessment principles are the main factor: MAUT emphasizes an even distribution of scores across all criteria, while PM focuses more on fit with the ideal profile, particularly on the core criteria (CF) . This finding emphasizes that the choice of methods should be tailored to selection priorities, or used in combination to obtain more accurate and objective results.  \nKeywords: Decision Support System; MAUT; Profile Matching; Paskibraka Selection; Method Compa","cbCaibahjuYwmq96","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaibahjuYwmq96","pdf",709052,11,"Indonesian","# PENDAHULUAN\n## Proses Seleksi Paskibraka dan Tantangan Penilaian\n## Tujuan Penelitian dan Pendekatan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan\n## Metode yang Dibandingkan: MAUT dan Profile Matching","[{\"question\":\"Apa tujuan penelitian ini dalam seleksi calon Paskibraka?\",\"answer\":\"Membandingkan keakuratan metode MAUT dan Profile Matching dalam sistem pendukung keputusan seleksi calon Paskibraka.\"},{\"question\":\"Bagaimana cara kerja metode MAUT dalam pengambilan keputusan seleksi?\",\"answer\":\"MAUT menghitung skor utilitas dengan mempertimbangkan bobot masing-masing kriteria penilaian.\"},{\"question\":\"Apa perbedaan utama prinsip penilaian antara MAUT dan Profile Matching?\",\"answer\":\"MAUT menekankan distribusi skor yang merata pada seluruh kriteria, sedangkan Profile Matching berfokus pada kesesuaian dengan profil ideal terutama pada kriteria inti (CF).\"}]","Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan Profile Matching Terhadap Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Paskibraka | PDF",17]