[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-es-110":3,"doc-seo-436135-110":49,"doc-detail-436135-es":117},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,17,21,25,29,33,37,41,45],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},39,"Document","Cómic",60,"comic",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":16},43,"Estilo de Vida","lifestyle",{"id":18,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":19,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":20},38,"Examen","exam",{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":23,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":24},44,"General","general",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":27,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":28},41,"Investigación e Informes","research-report",{"id":30,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":31,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":32},37,"Literatura","literature",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":36},22,"Relatos y Novelas","story-novel",{"id":38,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":39,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":40},42,"Religión y Espiritualidad","religion-spirituality",{"id":42,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":43,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":44},40,"Salud y Atención Médica","healthcare",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":47,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":48},24,"Tecnología","technology",{"code":4,"msg":50,"data":51},"ok",{"site_id":52,"language":53,"slug":54,"title":55,"keywords":56,"description":57,"schema_data":58,"social_meta":110,"head_meta":112,"extra_data":114,"updated_unix":116},110,"es","environmental-law-through-cultures-comparisons-for-legal-practice","Derecho Ambiental a Través de las Culturas - Comparaciones para la práctica jurídica","","El documento contiene una decisión judicial del Tribunal de Essen (15 de diciembre de 2016) en el caso Lliuya v RWE AG, relativo a un riesgo de inundación glaciar asociado al lago Palcacocha en la región de Ancash, Perú. El fallo rechaza la pretensión del demandante, que solicitaba medidas preventivas y la asunción proporcional de costos vinculados a la contribución atribuida a emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero. Se describen los hechos geográficos y el historial de desastres glaciares, así como el marco procedimental del proceso.",{"@graph":59,"@context":109},[60,77,92],{"@type":61,"itemListElement":62},"BreadcrumbList",[63,68,71,74],{"item":64,"name":65,"@type":66,"position":67},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":69,"name":9,"@type":66,"position":70},"https://docshare.wps.com/es/document/",2,{"item":72,"name":27,"@type":66,"position":73},"https://docshare.wps.com/es/document/investigación-e-informes/",3,{"item":75,"name":55,"@type":66,"position":76},"https://docshare.wps.com/es/document/environmental-law-through-cultures-comparisons-for-legal-practice/436135/",4,{"url":75,"name":55,"@type":78,"author":79,"headline":55,"publisher":82,"fileFormat":85,"inLanguage":53,"description":57,"dateModified":86,"datePublished":86,"encodingFormat":85,"isAccessibleForFree":87,"interactionStatistic":88},"DigitalDocument",{"name":80,"@type":81},"Finn","Person",{"url":64,"name":83,"@type":84},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":89,"interactionType":90,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":91},"ViewAction",{"@type":93,"mainEntity":94},"FAQPage",[95,101,105],{"name":96,"@type":97,"acceptedAnswer":98},"¿Qué resolvió el tribunal en el caso Lliuya v RWE AG?","Question",{"text":99,"@type":100},"El tribunal desestimó la demanda. El demandante asumió los costos del procedimiento, y se indicó que el fallo puede ejecutarse provisionalmente con una seguridad equivalente al 110% del monto ejecutable.","Answer",{"name":102,"@type":97,"acceptedAnswer":103},"¿Cuál es el origen del riesgo discutido en el documento?",{"text":104,"@type":100},"El documento relaciona el riesgo con una posible crecida o “flood wave” vinculada a la dinámica glaciar del área del lago Palcacocha, donde existieron antecedentes de desbordes tras terremotos y avalanchas.",{"name":106,"@type":97,"acceptedAnswer":107},"¿Qué alegó el demandante respecto a la responsabilidad del demandado?",{"text":108,"@type":100},"El demandante sostuvo que, pese a medidas previas, el nivel del lago volvió a un estado peligroso y que la empresa demandada contribuyó al riesgo en proporción a su participación en emisiones globales de gases de efecto invernadero, argumentando una conexión causal en sentido jurídico.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":75,"og:type":111,"og:title":55,"og:site_name":83,"og:description":57},"article",{"robots":113,"canonical":75},"index,follow",{"doc_id":115,"site_id":52},436135,1790676913,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":118},{"doc_id":115,"user_id":119,"nickname":80,"user_avatar":120,"doc_module":4,"category_id":26,"category_name":27,"doc_title":55,"doc_description":57,"doc_content":121,"file_id":122,"file_url":123,"file_type":124,"file_size":125,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":67,"is_downloadable":67,"audit_status":67,"page_count":126,"language":127,"language_code":53,"site_id":52,"html_lang":53,"table_of_contents":128,"faqs":129,"seo_title":130,"seo_description":57,"update_tm":116,"read_time":131},34359740700684,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/1f400023980c374ae676?_k=1777273430885731487","Unauthorised translation, provided by Germanwatch e.V.  \nDistrict Court Essen  \n-2-District Court Essen, 45117 Essen  \nRechtsanwälte Günther & Partner Mittelweg 150  \n20148 Hamburg  \n15 December, 2016  \nPage 1 of 1  \nFile number  \n2 O 285/15  \nPlease state when replying  \nCase officer Ms. Siepmann Telephone 0201/803-2012 Available:  \nMonday out of office  \nTuesday – Friday: 7:30 – 16:00  \nYour file number: 14/0354Z/R/rv Dear ladies and gentlemen, In the lawsuit  \nLliuya v RWE AG,  \nan advance transcript of the decision is transmitted via fax for information purposes.  \nSincerely,  \nSiepmann Judicial officer  \n-automatically generated and valid without signature  \nAddress  \nZweigertstr. 52  \n45130 Essen  \nOffice hours  \nDaily from 7:00 – 16:00  \nTelephone  \n0201/803-0  \nFax  \n0201/803-2493  \nOvernight mailbox: Zweigertstr. 52, 45130 Essen  \nAccount of the court cashier’s office Essen: Bundesbank IBAN  \nDE22 3600 0000 0036 0015 10 Transport connection:  \nTram line 101 or 105 to ‘Landgericht’  \nTranscript  \n2 O 285/15 Pronounced on 15 December, 2016  \nSiepmann, judicial officer, as clerk of the registry  \nDistrict Court Essen  \nIN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE  \nDecision  \nIn the case  \nof Mr. Saúl Ananías Luciano xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Departamento de Ancash, Provincia de Huaraz, Peru,  \nclaimant,  \nAttorney of record: Attorneys Günter & Partner, Mittelweg 150, 20148 Hamburg  \nagainst  \nthe RWE AG, represented by the chairman Mr. Peter Terium, Opernplatz 1, 45128 Essen, defendant,  \nAttorney of record: Attorneys Freshfields pp. , Feldmühleplatz 1 , 40545 Düsseldorf,  \nthe 2nd Civil Chamber of the District Court Essen, upon the oral proceedings of 24 November, 2016,  \nthrough the Presiding District Judge Krüger, the District Judge Dr. Bender, and the District  \nJudge Sommer, finds:  \nThe claim is dismissed.  \nThe claimant bears the costs of the proceedings.  \nThe judgement may be enforced provisionally by way of security equal to 110% of the enforceable sum.  \nFacts of the Case  \nThe claimant is the co-owner of a residence in the city of Huaraz in the Ancash region of Peru. He purchased the property from his parents per a notarized purchase contract on 9 May, 2014. Huaraz is located in the foothills of the Andes, in the region of the highest and northernmost range of the Andes, the Cordillera Blanca. There, at an altitude of 4,562 m, below the Palcaraju Glacier and at the foot of the peaks Nevado Palcaraju (6,274 m) and Nevado Pucaranra (6,156 m), lies Lake Palcacocha.  \nThe lake is staunched by a natural moraine. Meltwater from the overlying glacier and precipitation accumulate in the lake, which can only drain naturally to a limited extent. At the end of the 1930s, the lake’s water volume amounted to between 10 and 12 million m³ .  \nIn the region pertinent to the claim, earthquakes and landslides occur occasionally, which have in the past been the cause of glacial outbreaks. In 1941, due to an earthquake, an avalanche barreled down into the lake. The resulting flood wave caused the moraine dam to break and subsequently flooded a large part of the city of Huaraz.  \nSince then, various preventative measures have been taken, including artificial drains and dams. A reoccurrence of a such catastrophe was to be prevented, and the water volume of the lake was to be lowered on a permanent basis.  \nProhibiting settlement in the area endangered by flooding was discussed, but these plans were blocked by opposition from the local public.  \nIn 2009, the water volume had increased to 17.3 million m³ .  \nIn the following years, further measures were taken to reduce the water level. In February 2016, however, the water volume was again measured at 17.4 million m³ .  \nIn all likelihood, in the case of a flood wave, the house of the claimant would also be flooded. The defendant is the parent company of various subsidiaries, which conduct business in the area of energy production.  \nThe claimant asserts that the water le","cbCaimsgNF609lF7","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimsgNF609lF7","pdf",141317,7,"Spanish","# Hechos del caso\n## Ubicación y antecedentes del lago Palcacocha\n## Riesgos geológicos y catástrofes históricas\n## Medidas preventivas previas y nuevos niveles de agua\n# Pretensiones del demandante\n## Determinación proporcional de costos según contribución\n## Órdenes alternativas sobre reducción del volumen y pagos\n# Decisión y costas","[{\"question\":\"¿Qué resolvió el tribunal en el caso Lliuya v RWE AG?\",\"answer\":\"El tribunal desestimó la demanda. El demandante asumió los costos del procedimiento, y se indicó que el fallo puede ejecutarse provisionalmente con una seguridad equivalente al 110% del monto ejecutable.\"},{\"question\":\"¿Cuál es el origen del riesgo discutido en el documento?\",\"answer\":\"El documento relaciona el riesgo con una posible crecida o “flood wave” vinculada a la dinámica glaciar del área del lago Palcacocha, donde existieron antecedentes de desbordes tras terremotos y avalanchas.\"},{\"question\":\"¿Qué alegó el demandante respecto a la responsabilidad del demandado?\",\"answer\":\"El demandante sostuvo que, pese a medidas previas, el nivel del lago volvió a un estado peligroso y que la empresa demandada contribuyó al riesgo en proporción a su participación en emisiones globales de gases de efecto invernadero, argumentando una conexión causal en sentido jurídico.\"}]","Derecho Ambiental a Través de las Culturas - Comparaciones para la práctica jurídica | PDF",11]