[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-404429-105":59,"doc-detail-404429-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","why-we-are-not-nietzscheans","Why We Are not Nietzscheans","","A collection of essays argues against adopting a Nietzsche shaped and promoted by French deconstructionists as a patron saint. Edited by Luc Ferry and Alain Renaut and translated by Robert de Loaiza, the volume frames its guiding strategy as thinking with Nietzsche against Nietzsche. Contributors revisit the context of Nietzsche’s work and re-evaluate how his ideas travel through modern French philosophy, including critiques of hierarchy-focused history, alleged distortions of religion and art, and an account of science portrayed as reactionary.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":15,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/why-we-are-not-nietzscheans/404429/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/why-we-are-not-nietzscheans/404429.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aran","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-09-27",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",13,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What is the volume’s central stance toward French deconstructionists’ use of Nietzsche?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The essays argue that Nietzsche transmitted through the deconstructionists must be reexamined in light of Nietzsche’s original context, and that the Nietzsche promoted by these thinkers should be abandoned in favor of reason.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What does the editors’ guiding idea mean: \"to think with Nietzsche against Nietzsche\"?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"It frames a strategy of engaging Nietzsche while challenging the destructive effects attributed to his \"philosophy with a hammer\" on French philosophy since the 1960s.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"How do the essays relate to the Enlightenment and rationality?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"They seek to renew the Enlightenment quest for rationality and argue that philosophy is not condemned to infinite deconstruction.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},404429,1790822854,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":14,"category_name":15,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":145,"read_time":146},137455076865,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","# WHY WE ARE NoTNIETZSCHEANS\n\nEDITED BY  \nLu c Ferry  \nand  \nA1ain Ren au t  \nTRANSLATED BY  \nRobert de Lo aiz a  \nP H I LP H Y  \n\"To think with Nietzsche against Nietzsche.\"Thus the editors describe the strate-gy adopted in this volume to soften the destructive effects of Nietzsche's \"philos-ophy with a hammer”on French philosophy since the 1960s.Frustrated by theinfinite inclusiveness of deconstructionism,the contributors to this volume seekto renew the Enlightenment quest for rationality.  \nThough linked by no common dogma,these essays all argue that the \"FrenchNietzsche\"transmitted through the deconstructionists must be reexamined inlight of the original context in which Nietzsche worked.Each essay questions theviability of Nietzsche's thought in the modern world,variously critiquing his phi-losophy of history as obsessed with hierarchy,his views on religion and art asmyopic and irrational,and his stance on science as hopelessly reactionary.  \nContending that we must abandon the Nietzsche propped up as patron saintby French deconstructionists in order to return to reason,these essays will stim-ulate debate not just among Nietzscheans but among all with a stake in modernFrench philosophy.  \nThe contributors are Alain Boyer,André Comte-Sponville,VincentDescombes,Luc Ferry.Robert Legros,Philippe Raynaud,Alain Renaut,andPierre-André Taguieff.  \n\"In recent years,a new generation of French philosophers have movedbeyond the Nietzsche fascination which has gripped so many of their cele-brated elders.This fine anthology surveys the different paths they havecleared to a renewed,if chastened,commitment to the beleaguered ideals oftruth,reason,and morality.\"—Charles Larmore,Columbia University  \nLuc FERRY is professor of philosophy at the Sorbonne and at the University ofCaen.He is author or coauthor of six volumes published by the University ofChicago Press,most recently The New Ecological Order.ALAIN RENAUT is pro-fessor of political science at the Sorbonne.He is coauthor of several books withLuc Ferry,and author of Sartre,le Dernier Philosophe.RoBERT DE LoAIZAlives in Paris and teaches philosophy and English at Nanterre University.  \nCover design by Andrea Federle-Bucsi  \nCover illustration:Portrait of Nietzsche,GSA 101/17.courtesy of Stiftung Weimarer Klassik.  \nDigitized by the Internet Archivein 2023 with funding fromKahle/Austin Foundation  \nhttps://archive.org/details/whywearenotnietz0000unse  \nW HY WE A R E N OT NI ET Z S CHE AN S  \nWHY WE ARE notNIETZSCHEANS  \nEdited by  \nLUC FER RY andA LAIN RENAUT  \nTranslated by  \nR OBERT DE LOAIZA  \nTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGo PRESSChicago cLondon  \nLucFERRY is professor of philosophy at the Sorbonne and at the University ofCaen.Among his previous books published in translation by the University ofChicago Press is The New Ecological Order.ALAIN RENAUT is professor ofpolitical science at the Sorbonne and the author of Sartre,le dernier philosophe.FERRY and RENAUT are co-authors of Heidegger and Modernity,also publishedby the University of Chicago Press.  \nThe University ofChicago Press,Chicago 60637The University of Chicago Press Ltd.,LondonC1997by The University of ChicagoAll rights reserved.Published 1997Printed in the United States of Americao5040302 oI 00999897 I2345  \nISBN o-226-2448o-6(cloth)  \n0-226-2448I-4(paper)  \nOriginally published as Pourquoi nous ne sommes pas nietzscheens,◎ Editions Grasset &Fasquelle,I991.  \nLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data  \nPourquoi nous ne sommes pas Nietzscheens.English.  \nWhy we are not Nietzscheans /edited by Luc Ferry and AlainRenaut;translated by Robert de Loaiza  \np.cm.  \nIncludes bibliographical references and index.  \nISBNo-226-2448o-6 (cloth:alk.paper).—ISBNo-226-2448I-4  \n(paper :alk.paper)  \nI.Nietzsche,Friedrich Wilhelm,I844-I90o.I.Ferry,Luc.  \nII.Renaut,Alain.Ⅲ.Title.  \nB3317.P58 I997  \n96-4I718  \nI93—dc20  \nCIP  \nOThe paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the AmericanNational Standard for Informat","cbCaibxFMyoiReUD","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaibxFMyoiReUD","pdf",14114671,246,"English","# Preface to the 1991 French Edition\n# Hierarchy and Truth\n# The Brute, the Sophist, and the Aesthete: \"Art in Service of Illusion\"\n# Nietzsche's French Moment\n# \"What Must First Be Proved Is Worth Little\"","[{\"question\":\"What is the volume’s central stance toward French deconstructionists’ use of Nietzsche?\",\"answer\":\"The essays argue that Nietzsche transmitted through the deconstructionists must be reexamined in light of Nietzsche’s original context, and that the Nietzsche promoted by these thinkers should be abandoned in favor of reason.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the editors’ guiding idea mean: \\\"to think with Nietzsche against Nietzsche\\\"?\",\"answer\":\"It frames a strategy of engaging Nietzsche while challenging the destructive effects attributed to his \\\"philosophy with a hammer\\\" on French philosophy since the 1960s.\"},{\"question\":\"How do the essays relate to the Enlightenment and rationality?\",\"answer\":\"They seek to renew the Enlightenment quest for rationality and argue that philosophy is not condemned to infinite deconstruction.\"}]","Why We Are not Nietzscheans | PDF",1790547858,379]