[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-187060-en":3,"doc-seo-187060-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":92},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},187060,1099514068035,"Ezra","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",8,"Research & Report","Why Percent-Plans For University Admissions Are Not A Colorblind Success","This document analyzes the effectiveness of percentage-based plans in university admissions, exemplified by Texas's Top 10% Law, and their impact on racial diversity. It examines data from UT and Texas A&M, comparing outcomes during periods of affirmative action, no policy, and the Top 10% Law. The analysis reveals that while percentage plans can increase representation for some minority groups, they do not necessarily achieve broad diversity, particularly for African Americans. The document highlights that the effectiveness of such plans is contingent on the demographic makeup of the state's high school graduates and the specific implementation of the policy. Furthermore, it suggests that these plans may not fully compensate for the decline in affirmative action admissions, leading to concerns about overall diversity and equity in higher education. The data presented indicates varying trends across different racial and ethnic groups, underscoring the complexity of achieving diversity goals through purely race-neutral policies. The research implies that a multifaceted approach may be necessary to ensure equitable access and representation in university admissions.","|  | UT |  |  | Texas A&M |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | Affirmative\u003Cbr>Action: 1990–96 | No Policy: 1997 | Top 10% Law:\u003Cbr>1998–2003 | Affirmative\u003Cbr>Action: 1990–96 | No Policy: 1997 | Top 10% Law:\u003Cbr>1998–2003 |\n| White | 59.1 | 64.0 | 61.7 | 61.8 | 57.4 | 64.6 |\n| Asian | 60.8 | 64.0 | 63.3 | 38.3 | 32.2 | 36.5 |\n| Hispanic | 54.5 | 64.3 | 60.2 | 50.3 | 46.5 | 51.7 |\n| Black | 57.7 | 56.3 | 56.6 | 46.2 | 41.1 | 48.6 |\n\n\n|  | UT |  |  | Texas A&M |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | Affirmative\u003Cbr>Action: 1990–96 | No Policy: 1997 | Top 10% Law:\u003Cbr>1998–2003 | Affirmative\u003Cbr>Action: 1990–96 | No Policy: 1997 | Top 10% Law:\u003Cbr>1998–2003 |\n| White | .664 | .668 | .623 | .782 | .805 | .822 |\n| Asian | .134 | .163 | .179 | .034 | .036 | .035 |\n| Hispanic | .150 | .127 | .144 | .125 | .098 | .094 |\n| Black | .040 | .028 | .036 | .041 | .028 | .027 |\n| Totals | .988 | .986 | .982 | .982 | .967 | .978 |","cbCaidLEiVQUXX2a","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidLEiVQUXX2a","pdf",1159995,1,19,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n# Data Analysis\n## UT Data\n## Texas A&M Data\n## Comparison of Policies\n# Conclusion","[{\"question\":\"What is the Top 10% Law and how does it relate to university admissions?\",\"answer\":\"The Top 10% Law in Texas automatically admits students who graduate in the top 10% of their high school class, regardless of other factors. This policy was implemented as an alternative to race-conscious affirmative action in university admissions.\"},{\"question\":\"Did the Top 10% Law successfully increase racial diversity in university admissions?\",\"answer\":\"While the Top 10% Law did show some increase in diversity, particularly for Hispanic students, it did not fully compensate for the loss of affirmative action, especially in maintaining African American representation. The overall diversity achieved varied between institutions and demographic groups.\"},{\"question\":\"How did university admissions outcomes differ between affirmative action and the Top 10% Law?\",\"answer\":\"During affirmative action periods, institutions like UT and Texas A\\u0026M saw different patterns in racial representation compared to the Top 10% Law. The Top 10% Law, while increasing the admission of certain minority groups, often resulted in lower percentages for some groups, like African Americans, compared to when affirmative action was permitted.\"}]","Why Percent-Plans For University Admissions Are Not A Colorblind Success | PDF",1788380235,48,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":13,"keywords":34,"description":14,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":87,"head_meta":89,"extra_data":91,"updated_unix":28},"why-percent-plans-for-university-admissions-are-not-a-colorblind-success","",{"@graph":36,"@context":86},[37,54,69],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,51],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":49,"name":12,"@type":43,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":52,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/why-percent-plans-for-university-admissions-are-not-a-colorblind-success/187060/",4,{"url":52,"name":13,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":13,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":63,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":64,"interactionStatistic":65},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":41,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-04","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":66,"interactionType":67,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":68},"ViewAction",{"@type":70,"mainEntity":71},"FAQPage",[72,78,82],{"name":73,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":75},"What is the Top 10% Law and how does it relate to university admissions?","Question",{"text":76,"@type":77},"The Top 10% Law in Texas automatically admits students who graduate in the top 10% of their high school class, regardless of other factors. This policy was implemented as an alternative to race-conscious affirmative action in university admissions.","Answer",{"name":79,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":80},"Did the Top 10% Law successfully increase racial diversity in university admissions?",{"text":81,"@type":77},"While the Top 10% Law did show some increase in diversity, particularly for Hispanic students, it did not fully compensate for the loss of affirmative action, especially in maintaining African American representation. The overall diversity achieved varied between institutions and demographic groups.",{"name":83,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":84},"How did university admissions outcomes differ between affirmative action and the Top 10% Law?",{"text":85,"@type":77},"During affirmative action periods, institutions like UT and Texas A&M saw different patterns in racial representation compared to the Top 10% Law. The Top 10% Law, while increasing the admission of certain minority groups, often resulted in lower percentages for some groups, like African Americans, compared to when affirmative action was permitted.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":88,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":90,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":93},[94,98,102,106,111,116,121,124,129,132,136],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":47,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":53,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":113,"show_sort_weight":114,"slug":115},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":118,"show_sort_weight":119,"slug":120},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":123},30,"research-report",{"id":125,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":126,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":128},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":130,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":131},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":133,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":134,"show_sort_weight":133,"slug":135},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":21,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":137,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":138},"General","general"]