[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-32111":3,"doc-seo-32111":28},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"table_of_contents":24,"faqs":25,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":26,"read_time":27},32111,1099514068035,"Ezra","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",8,"Research & Report","Who Influences Employees’ Dark Side: A Multi-Foci Meta-Analysis of Counterproductive Workplace Behaviors","A theory-driven quantitative review examines employee counterproductive workplace behaviors (CWBs) using a multi-foci perspective. The analysis synthesizes relationships between CWBs and antecedents from four sources: supervisors, the organization, coworkers, and private life. Grounded in Conservation of Resources Theory, the study applies the primacy of loss principle to contrast unfavorable versus favorable correlates. Meta-analysis of 181 field studies with 223 independent samples finds unfavorable antecedents relate more strongly to CWBs than favorable antecedents, with supervisor- and organization-related factors showing the strongest links.","cbCaiirfGRIesDFd","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiirfGRIesDFd","pdf",568060,11,1,47,"English","en","# Abstract\n## Research focus and multi-foci framework\n## Theory and hypotheses based on Conservation of Resources Theory\n## Meta-analytic method and sample characteristics\n## Key findings and implications","[{\"question\":\"What do the results show about unfavorable versus favorable antecedents?\",\"answer\":\"Unfavorable antecedents correlate more strongly with CWBs than favorable antecedents. Supervisor- and organization-related antecedents also show stronger relationships with CWBs than the two other groups.\"}]",1780866211,118,{"code":4,"msg":29,"data":30},"ok",{"site_id":31,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":33,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":78,"head_meta":80,"extra_data":82,"updated_unix":26},105,"who-influences-employees-dark-side-a-multi-foci-meta-analysis-of-counterproductive-workplace-behaviors","",{"@graph":35,"@context":77},[36,53,68],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,47,50],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":48,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":49},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":51,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":52},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/who-influences-employees-dark-side-a-multi-foci-meta-analysis-of-counterproductive-workplace-behaviors/32111/",4,{"url":51,"name":13,"@type":54,"author":55,"headline":13,"publisher":57,"fileFormat":60,"description":14,"dateModified":61,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":60,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":56},"Person",{"url":40,"name":58,"@type":59},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-14","2026-06-07",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"What do the results show about unfavorable versus favorable antecedents?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"Unfavorable antecedents correlate more strongly with CWBs than favorable antecedents. Supervisor- and organization-related antecedents also show stronger relationships with CWBs than the two other groups.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":51,"og:type":79,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":58,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":81,"canonical":51},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":31}]